Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sugar development fund act 1982 section 5 applications for loans or grants Court: karnataka dharwad

Jul 15 2011 (HC)

Thungabhadra Sugarcane and Banana Growers Association and Others Vs. t ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... shall, as far as possible utilise such amounts for development of sugarcane in the state]. (8) where any producer of sugar or his agent has defaulted in furnishing information under clause 9 of this order or has defaulted in paying the whole or ..... to the factory. the amount still remaining undisbursed with the collector, after meeting the claims from the suppliers, shall be credited by him to the consolidated fund of the state, immediately after the expiry of the time limit of 3 years within which claims therefore could be preferred by the suppliers. the state government ..... reserved. in spite of the order when the government did not initiate any criminal proceedings, the petitioner initiated criminal prosecution under the provisions of essential commodities act. in the meanwhile five farmers of the reserved area filed w.p.no.37820/2009 for a writ of mandamus seeking direction to the deputy commissioner, bellary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2016 (HC)

Shivappa S/O Shankrappa Vadagalla Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... during the relevant time. the letters and the certificates submitted by the collector and the secretary of the meerut development authority to the state government before the issue of the notification under section 4(1) of the act clearly demonstrated that at that time therewas a great urgency felt by them regarding the provision of housing accommodation ..... to complete the project on or before march, 2017 and the project work has to be completed within the time frame. the government of india has provided the fund to the project under the accelerated irrigation benefit programme (aibp). in view of the reasons stated supra, point no.(i) is 88 answered in the negative ..... and already the expenditure spent up to november 2015 is about 2088.83 crores and balance required for completion of work is rs.472.05 crores and the fund is provided by the central government scheme called accelerated irrigation benefit programme (aibp), under which, the project has to be completed before march, 2017 and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Mahaganapati Shankara Devasthana Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... sentence not having been reversed offence pardoned; or (vi) if he has at any time acted the interest of the institution; or adverse has for an if he or to 92 for renovation contributed for construction, repairs, or development of any hindu religious institution or charitable institution or for the performance of utsavam or any ..... in a later judgment in a. ramaswamy dikshitulu v. government of andhra pradesh, (2004 ) 4 scc661 in so far as the challenge to the 'common pool fund', 'the advisory committee' and 'declared institutions'- was concerned, the division bench had considered the law laid down by the apex court with regard to the interpretation of ..... in chapter ii deals with the powers of the commissioner. chapter iii deals with the appointment of archakas and temple servants, emoluments, salary etc. common pool fund is created in terms of chapter iv. advisory committee is constituted in terms of chapter v. notifying institutions are referred in chapter vii and declared institutions are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2015 (HC)

Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B Patil Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... on that note that the questions of law, noted earlier, were referred to the full bench. on a consideration of the rival contentions and the history and development of hindu law as well as the law commission report, the report of the standing committee of parliament and the statement of objects and reasons of the bill ..... , shri s.s.nagananad, appearing for the counsel for the petitioner, contends as follows : that the object in substituting section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956, by act no.39 of 2005, was to address the discrimination that was inherent in the section as it stood before the amendment, whereby the females did not inherit ..... the petitioners are seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of the explanation appended to sub-section (5) of section 6 of the hindu succession (amendment) act, 2005, (act 39 of 2005), namely: explanation: for the purposes of this section partition means any partition made by execution of a deed of partition duly registered under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2022 (HC)

Ravi S/o Basavarajappa Kumatagi Vs. The Principal Secretary

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... town planning and in consonance with the same bagalkot town development authority (btda) was also constituted. the said btda is created to effectuate the purpose of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987. therefore, all the requirements under the same should be met in the land acquired ..... scenario especially the new culture of planned development of the habitats, new laws have also come in for regulating ..... he also submitted that this cannot also be seen in isolation from worldwide development like liberalization of the economy and the need to accommodate industries, government offices and the views of funding agencies like world bank for overall planned development of bagalkot. he also brought to our notice that on account of emerging .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2022 (HC)

Mr. Gopal S/o Govind Karjol Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... town planning and in consonance with the same bagalkot town development authority (btda) was also constituted. the said btda is created to effectuate the purpose of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987. therefore, all the requirements under the same should be met in the land acquired ..... scenario especially the new culture of planned development of the habitats, new laws have also come in for regulating ..... he also submitted that this cannot also be seen in isolation from worldwide development like liberalization of the economy and the need to accommodate industries, government offices and the views of funding agencies like world bank for overall planned development of bagalkot. he also brought to our notice that on account of emerging .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2015 (HC)

The State of Karnataka, Vs. Istak Ahmad Mahammadsaheb,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the respondents were the claimants whose lands have been acquired in gaddanakeri village, bagalkot taluk and district. the plots of land were acquired by the bagalkot town development authority, bagalkot, for laying a water pipe line to navanagar and gaddanakeri village. the notification under section 4(1) of the land acquisition ..... and the claim for compensation was rejected outright.4. the respondents, thereafter, being aggrieved by the award, had filed claim petitions under section 18 of the l.a. act, raising several grounds, namely, that the award was unjust and illegal. the land being treated as pot kharab was without reference to the fact that it was indeed ..... did not arise. it was converted for such non-agricultural use as on the date of the publication of notification under section 4(1) of the l.a. act, and therefore, the land acquisition officer was not justified in negating the claim as regards the compensation. the plots were situated within the town planning area of bagalkot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2015 (HC)

Basabagouda S/O Bharamangouda Patil Vs. The Assistant Commissioner/

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... this would constitute the second step in the process of determination of the correct quantum of deductions. the lands under reference may be totally undeveloped, partially developed, substantially developed or fully developed. in arriving at an appropriate classification of the nature of the lands which are to be compared, reference may be made to the developmental activities referred ..... district koppal. respondents. (by shri k.s. patil, government pleader for respondents 1 to2) 2 this miscellaneous first appeal is filed under section 54 of the land acquisition act, 1894 against the judgment and award dated 20.09.2012 passed in lac no.38/2012 on the file of the senior civil judge at koppal, partly allowing the ..... at rs.2,88,000/- per acre, on the basis of sale statistics. the appellant had filed a petition under section 18(1) of the la act seeking enhancement of the market value at rs.1.50 crore per acre. the reference court had, while 3 holding that the subject land had the potential of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2020 (HC)

Chandrakant S/o Tammanna Majagi Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... unhindered. the bar association is a collective of advocates, and has certain statutory obligations which it is required to discharge under the advocates welfare fund act, 2001 (for short the 2001 act). the central function that the legal profession must perform is nothing less than the administration of justice. (the practice of law is a public ..... save and promote intend of legal profession and its members, to promote high professional tone, standard and conduct amongst members of legal profession, to promote and develop legal science, to watch legislation for the purpose of assisting in the progress of sound legislation and to print 'cause list', leave one in no ..... to the directives containing the constitution the universal declaration of human rights, european convention of social, economic and cultural rights and the convention on right to development for socio-economic justice. social security is a facet of socio-economic justice to the people and a means to livelihood.21. the hon ble .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2022 (HC)

Shri.parappa S/o Hamappa Lamani Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... in c.c.no.497/2013 by the civil judge and jmfc, shiggaon, for the commission of offence punishable under section 4(1) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short mmrd act ) and rule 3(1) and rule 42 of the karnataka minor mineral concession rules, 1994 (for short kmmcr rules ), which is partly allowed by the i ..... this revision petition.9. learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner s counsel has submitted his arguments that complainant has not followed the mandatory provisions of section 23b of mmrd act, 1957. the tahasildar has conducted the mahazar as per ex.p-3 in which the name of driver is shown as manju lamani and owner of the vehicle is ..... any defence evidence on his behalf.6. on hearing the arguments, the trial court has convicted the accused for the commission of offence punishable under section 4(1) of mmrd act and - 5 - crl.rp no.100006 of 2016 rules 3(1) and 42 of kmmcr rules and accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 months and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //