Substantive Right - Judgment Search Results

Brij Pal Tanwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

that acting paid promotion will be later on converted to substantive promotion no such indication is there in the api in the respondents provides for quarterly counselling and recording of the information gathered upon such counselling in the counselling register the respondents

Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P. A. Vs. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act requires while it may not be easy to decide what is actually a substantive right the designations substantive and procedural become important for the enabling act has made them so ely 723 ..... a state rule that regulates something traditionally considered to be procedural might actually define a substantive right justice scalia s objection moreover misses the key point in some instances a state rule .....

Vandana Karki and ors. Vs. L. Chandrakishore Singh and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... regular appointment is an appointment made according to the rules while substantive appointment gives certain additional rights when an employee was confirmed on a subsequent date the earlier appointment ..... could not have been substantive even though he might have been appointed against a substantive post .....

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consistent argument that 1 bars discrimination alone and does not afford protection to any substantive rights see e g r berger government by judiciary the transformation of the fourteenth ..... fifth amendment in the late eighteenth century encompassed judicial recognition and enforcement of unenumerated substantive rights maltz fourteenth amendment concepts in the antebellum era 32 am j legal hist 305 .....

Niranjan Paul Singh Chouhan [Brig.] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2005(1)JKJ632

..... the high court rejecting the writ petition held that the appellant had no right to be promoted to the substantive post of major general especially when on two occasions inquires conducted under ..... such promotion in terms of regulation 68 it is not only selection which confers a right for promotion to the substantive rank it also prescribes that selected person is entitled to a .....

Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd. Vs. Singapore Land Authority

Court: Singapore Supreme Court

..... on any view the doctrine of legitimate expectation gives rise to only procedural rights and cannot give rise to substantive rights at 148 89 a 3 2 majority of the judges in the ..... that the doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot give rise to substantive rights at 97 94 to sum up canadian law does not grant substantive relief via the doctrine of legitimate expectations instead an .....

R Vs. Saik (Appellant) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal D ...

Court: House of Lords

..... person s intention this is a different harm from the commission of the substantive offence so it is right that the intention which is being criminalised in the offence of conspiracy should ..... be liable for conspiracy where he lacks the knowledge required to commit the substantive offence that could not be right parliament could not have intended such an absurd result rather the assumption .....

R (on the Application of Smith) (Fc) (Respondent) Vs. Secretary of Sta ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... of jurisdiction would invert and divide the positive obligation on contracting states to secure the substantive rights in a manner never contemplated by article 1 of the convention when moreover the ..... body into certain types of death that is those occurring in circumstances potentially engaging the substantive right which article 2 contains english law has long required a coroner s inquest in .....

Braithwaite Burn and Jessop Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Indo Wagon Engin ...

Court: Kolkata

..... such section 26 of the amending act by way of an amendment substantive rights cannot be taken away and the substantive rights would be governed by the pre amended provision of the act that ..... the hon ble division bench held that an amendment cannot take away a substantive right and any clog against such substantive right cannot be given effect to retrospectively that the amended provision can only .....

County of Sacramento Vs. Lewis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... his safety app 13 i agree with the court s conclusion that this asserts a substantive right to be free from deliberate or reckless indifference to life in a high speed automobile ..... s department and deputy smith alleging a deprivation of philip lewis s fourteenth amendment substantive due process right to life 1 the district court granted summary judgment for smith reasoning that even .....