Skip to content


Subscribe - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: subscribe Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 490 results (0.012 seconds)
Jan 31 2002 (TRI)

Shriram Chits (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Jan-31-2002

Reported in: (2002)83ITD792(Hyd.)

..... be distributed as dividend equally among all the 50 subscribers le each subscriber would get a dividend of rs 150 even the ..... the promoter company the assessee company can also become a subscriber the company which promotes these chit groups compulsorily joins each ..... that the chit dividend amount received by the appellant qua subscriber is not taxable on grounds of mutuality he further contended .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2002 (HC)

Escotal Mobile Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-15-2002

Reported in: [2002]123TAXMAN134(Ker)

..... department was charging was the rent for connecting instruments placed in the premises of the subscriber with the telephone exchange by way of telegraphic lines so the department was charging for ..... the process of activation are services provided by the mobile cellular telephone companies to the subscribers and squarely fall within the definition of taxable service as defined in section 65 72 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 2002 (TRI)

Paresh M. Parekh, Yogesh B. Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-08-2002

..... payment crisis at baroda stock exchange your action as above enables dubious issues to get subscribed and listed and helps the promoters in cornering the shares which then facilitate price manipulation ..... records that aforementioned four applicants are known to each other and as a group have subscribed to many a public issue using similar modus operandi the appellants financing the purchase of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 2002 (HC)

Discount and Finance House of India Ltd. Vs. S.K. Bhardwaj, Cit and or ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-04-2002

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR621; 2003(3)BomCR283; (2003)180CTR(Bom)278; [2003]259ITR295(Bom); 2003(2)MhLj772

..... two segments viz primary market and secondary market the primary market consists of issuers and subscribers the issuers are the central and state governments the secondary market includes banks financial ..... primary dealers etc the petitioner is a primary dealer in dated government securities the petitioner subscribes to buys stocks and trades in dated government securities regularly at the end of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 2002 (TRI)

Director General (investigation Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on: Aug-14-2002

Reported in: II(2003)CPJ26MRTP

..... the fact that the telephone bills include capital contributions for which the consent of the subscribers was not taken ii the telephone rentals and other charges are raised almost periodically ..... revoked the arbitration clause which is meant for the dispute between the telegraph authority and subscriber 2 the respondent is only operating agency for implementation of government of india s policies .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Saket Extrusions Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-19-2002

..... investigations it was seen that the public issue of sel was subscribed in the following manner 6 scrutiny of collection schedule of ..... ahmedabad and almost all the stock invests purchased by them for subscribing to various public issues have been cancelled 17 in view of ..... that mr yashwant a thakkar and mr rashmikant a thakkar have subscribed to other public issues using similar modus operandi i also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2002 (TRI)

Asia Satellite Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-01-2002

Reported in: (2003)85ITD478(Delhi)

..... been received for technical services it was further held that the subscribers to a cellular telephone service were using the facility and ..... hon ble high court was to consider the relationship between the subscribers who use the telephone facility and the provider of the ..... receiving a technical service no doubt the public analogous to the subscribers to the cellular phone in that case use the facility .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 2002 (TRI)

Neeta Gupta Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Jun-12-2002

..... telex so disconnected may if the telegraph authority thinks fit be restored if the defaulting subscriber pays the outstanding dues and the reconnection fee together with the rental for such portion ..... that there is commonality of user and there is nexus between the defaulting subscribers as well as the subscribers whose telephone is sought to be disconnected the department can resort to invocation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2002 (TRI)

Shri Debasish Dutta Vs. B.G. Somadder and Sons Private

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Feb-15-2002

..... which he claims to constitute 40 of the total issued subscribed and paid up capital of the respondent company fani dutta ..... decision the petitioner duly signified his consent to such decision by subscribing his signature on the said letter dated 01st january 2001 ..... letter dated 01st january 2001 which was written as aforesaid and subscribed to by the petitioner as well under the circumstances the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Vls Finance Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-20-2002

..... made by him and resulted in fraudulently inducing the investors to subscribe to the shares of the company the promoter was also ..... page of the prospectus 23 notwithstanding the same the issue was subscribed more than five times hence the inference by sebi that ..... the investors were induced and influenced to subscribe to the issue was out of context and unwarranted the investors .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //