Skip to content


Submit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: submit Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 17,630 results (0.138 seconds)
Jan 02 2002 (TRI)

Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex., Vs. Manan Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-02-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT357Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and recover the credit that is already taken in response to the notice the respondent submitted that it had wrongly claimed modvat credit under rule 57a and it intended to claim .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2002 (TRI)

Sidwal Refrigeration Indus. P. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC317

..... objection with a request to pay the duty the appellants in their appeal memo have submitted that the superintendent s letter is an appealable order and in support of which they .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2002 (TRI)

Kusum Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Aug-08-2002

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT900Tri(Kol.)kata

..... in the above cited case squarely covers the case of the appellant it was further submitted that this decision of the tribunal was approved by the apex court in the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 2002 (TRI)

Durga Trading Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-05-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC350

..... appellants no 2 and 5 when their firms had been separately penalised he has also submitted that penalties on other appellants deserve to be reduced we have gone through the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2002 (TRI)

Mahaveer Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Aug-02-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT274Tri(Bang.)

..... heading 72 7 907 sic and for which the appellant has claimed a deduction by submitting that items falling under 72 7 90 sic were not notified under the relevant rules .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2002 (TRI)

Thandava Co-op. Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Aug-02-2002

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT725Tri(Bang.)

..... dated 2 12 93 in his favour in the facts and circumstances stated it is submitted that in this case the amount of rs 10 lakhs was a deposit pending disposal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2002 (TRI)

Payal Udyog Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Aug-02-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT221Tri(Kol.)kata

..... can take the credit entry in their rg 23a part ii as such shri dey submits that an identical order be passed in their case 3 in view of the above .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2002 (TRI)

Kalvert Foods India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-02-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC366

..... at any time from the company without the cover of the invoice the company even submitted the affidavits of the dealers from ratnagiri chiplun khed wherein they had corroborated the stand .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2002 (TRI)

Shalimar Inds. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Jul-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT421Tri(Kol.)kata

..... broad description covering the input in question was filed by them in any case he submits that the sub heading given by them is the same and as such the modvat .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 2002 (TRI)

Asian Latex Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus., Icd, Tkd

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-13-2002

Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT116TriDel

..... destroyed goods 3 arguing the case for the appellants shri j m sharma learned consultant submits that the issue that remains to be decided in this case is as to what .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //