Subchapter - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: subchapter Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.007 seconds)Schweiker Vs. Gray Panthers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1981
..... the plan which a are consistent with the objectives of this subchapter b provide for taking into account only such income and ..... to whom supplemental security income benefits are not being paid under subchapter xvi of this chapter based on the variations between shelter costs ..... the plan which a are consistent with the objectives of this subchapter b provide for taking into account only such income and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlbernaz Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-19-1981
..... 1980 here we confront separate offenses with separate penalty provisions that are contained in distinct subchapters of the act the provisions are unambiguous on their face and each authorizes punishment ..... because two different committees in the house of representatives had jurisdiction over the different subchapters of the act the legislation was initially referred to the house committee on ways .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCounty of Washington Vs. Gunther
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
..... provides in relevant part notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an ..... two redundant sentences 1 notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an ..... it shall not be an unlawful employment practice under this subchapter for any employer to differentiate upon the basis of sex .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnderson Bros. Ford Vs. Valencia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
..... c 1604 provides the board shall prescribe regulations to carry out the purposes of this subchapter these regulations may contain such classifications differentiations or other provisions and may provide for ..... the judgment of the board are necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter to prevent circumvention or evasion thereof or to facilitate compliance therewith footnote 7 a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiddlesex County Sewerage Auth. Vs. Sea Clammers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1981
..... violation of any prohibition limitation criterion or permit established or issued by or under this subchapter the district courts shall have jurisdiction without regard to the amount in controversy or the ..... a court of the united states or a state to redress a violation of this subchapter 33 u s c 1415 g 1 2 the united states may intervene in any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSchweiker Vs. Wilson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-1981
..... receiving payments with respect to such individual or spouse under a state plan approved under subchapter xix medicaid 1611 e 1 b as amended 42 u s c 1382 e 1 ..... c no person shall be an eligible individual or eligible spouse for purposes of this subchapter with respect to any month if throughout such month he is an inmate of a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRowan Cos., Inc. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
..... and futa the old age and disability tax provisions of title viii became fica in subchapter a of chapter 9 and the unemployment compensation tax provision of title ix became futa ..... in subchapter c section 172 of the revenue act of 1942 had added the income tax withholding .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlessi Vs. Raybestos-manhattan, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1981
..... the scope of federal protection of employee pension benefits provides that the provisions of this subchapter shall supersede any and all state laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate ..... regulate directly or indirectly the terms and conditions of employee benefit plans covered by this subchapter 29 u s c 1144 c 2 emphasis added erisa s authors clearly meant to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNlrb Vs. Hendricks County Rural Elec.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-02-1981
..... employee and shall not be limited to the employees of a particular employer unless this subchapter explicitly states otherwise and shall include any individual whose work has ceased as a consequence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGulf Offshore Co. Vs. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1981
..... federal laws t o the extent that they are applicable and not inconsistent with this subchapter or with other federal laws 43 u s c 1333 a 2 in any particular .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial