Sub - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: sub Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 403 results (0.215 seconds)Jayaraman and Appar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Se ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Mad29; (2002)3MLJ732
..... by the union of india the first respondent herein through the land acquisition officer cum sub collector revenue karaikal pondicherry the second respondent herein by issuing a notification under section 4 ..... one and the same notification for construction of stadium 12 in land acquisition officer and sub collector gadwal vs smt sreelatha bhoopal and another the honourable apex court has held that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhaiji Vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Thandla and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)AWC2566(SC); JT2002(10)SC353; (2003)1SCC692; [2002]SUPP5SCR116
..... in themanner prescribed within the period of two years in the year 1982 83 the sub divisional officer thandla petlawad distt jhabua within whose jurisdiction the land is situated initiated ..... no exception enacted by the legislation petitioner should have participated in the enquiry before the sub divisional officer petitioner s petition premature appeal dismissed strong reliance was placed on the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSinu Sainudheen Vs. Sub Inspector of Police
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3205
..... alleging that they were conducting prosecution arrested them crime was registered by the sub inspector of police thrikkakkara 2 the learned public prosecutor submits that before conducting ..... raid in thehouse of the first accused the sub inspector of police thrikkakkara informed theassistant commissioner of police thrikkakkara about the information .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakhan Singh Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-28-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)AWC67
..... counsel for respondents 2 by the impugned order dated 4th july 2002 the prescribed authority sub divisional magistrate moth jhansi had allowed an application for recounting ballot papers in election ..... polled 4 after taking evidence and summoning the record pertaining to the election prescribed authority sub divisional magistrate found that total number of votes of all the five candidates were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMatsya Jivi Sahakari Samiti Vs. Sub-divisional Officer and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2002
Reported in: AIR2003All27; 2003(3)AWC1755
..... the petition the resolution of the gram panchayat was sent to the sub divisional officer for approval but the said authority did not pass any ..... is stated that the grant of lease has been approved by the sub divisional magistrate in paragraph 6 of the petition it is stated ..... the possession was given to respondent no 3 after approval by the sub divisional magistrate on 18 11 1999 in paragraph 7 of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFr. Pious Vs. Sub Regional Transport Officer
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-31-2002
Reported in: I(2003)ACC573; 2003(3)KLT965
appeals filed prior to 1 7 2002 are competent but subsequent to 1 7 2002 intro court appeals against judgment of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAysha Vs. Sub Registrar
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-24-2002
Reported in: I(2003)DMC50
appeals filed prior to 1 7 2002 are competent but subsequent to 1 7 2002 intro court appeals against judgment of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupriya Diwan and ors. Vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-10-2002
Reported in: 100(2002)DLT426
for the petitioners i am unable to accept the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners 5 in order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiv Lal Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-11-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)AWC203; (2003)1UPLBEC575
anjani kumar j 1 petitioner who claims to have been selected on the class iv post in the selection held...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalwant Gajanan SaThe Vs. Sub Divisional Officer and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-25-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR965; 2003(2)BomCR372; 2003(3)MhLj165
of the employer however the right of pension is always subject to the rules it is not inherent in the employment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial