Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722 of 2014 With SLP (C) No.19618 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.1013 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1082 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1068 of 2019 1 With Writ Petition (C) No.1037 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1062 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1070 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1104 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1165 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1222 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.396 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.756 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.398 pf 2018 With 2 Writ Petition (C) No.924 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1092 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1162 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1048 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1268 of 2019 And With Writ Petition (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2023 INSC1013REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1527 OF2022RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LIMITED APPELLANT VERSUS RAVINDRA LOONKAR, RESOLUTION PROFESSION OF ACIL LIMITED & ANR.1 RESPONDENTS R1 : Ravindra Loonkar, Resolution Profession(al) of ACIL Limited R2 : Committee of Creditors of ACIL Ltd. 1 Cause-title should correctly include Resolution Professional instead of 'Resolution Profession. 2 JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present appeal under Section 622 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) is directed against the Judgment dated 19.01.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Judgment) passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT)(Ins) No.845 of 2021 which has upheld the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal3) [hereinafter referred to as the Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2023INSC942IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1628 OF2023THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S TIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.2502-2513/2023, C.A. No.2644-2686/2023, C.A. No.2732/2023, C.A. No.2733/2023, C.A. No.1654/2023, C.A. No.1683/2023, C.A. No.1662//2023, C.A. No.1663/2023, C.A. No.1629/2023, C.A. No.1658/2023, C.A. No.1630/2023, C.A. No.1653/2023, C.A. No.1655/2023, C.A. No.1657/2023, C.A. No.1672/2023, C.A. No.1676/2023, C.A. No.1656/2023, C.A. No.1661/2023, C.A. No.1664/2023, C.A. No.1660/2023, C.A. No.1682/2023, C.A. No.1665/2023, C.A. No.1666/2023, C.A. No.1667/2023, C.A. No.1668/2023, C.A. No.1669/2023, C.A. No.1659/2023, C.A. No.2690/2023, C.A. No.1670/2023, C.A. No.1673/2023, C.A. No.1671/2023, C.A. No.1674/2023, C.A. No.1675/2023, C.A. No.1677/2023, C.A. No.2687/2023, C.A. No.2688/2023, C.A. No.2689/2023, SLP(C) No.7776/2023, SLP(C) No.13543-13545/2023, SLP(C) No.13529-13530/2023, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2023NSC873 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8641 OF2009MUKESH KUMAR APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. KULDEEP SINGH RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT S.V.N. BHATTI, J.1. The appellant-Mukesh Kumar is the tenant of Shop No.5 at Guru Amardas Chowk, Model Town, Jalandhar. In the instant Civil Appeal, he challenges the Order of Eviction from Shop No.5 under Section 13-B of the Act1.2. S. Kuldeep Singh, son of S. Harbhajan Singh-owner, filed Eviction Application No.6 of 2003 against the appellant-tenant for the subject premises before the Rent Controller, Jalandhar. Parties are referred to as Mukesh Kumar and S. Kuldeep Singh for the appellant and the respondent, respectively. The eviction case is that S. Kuldeep Singhs father, late S. Harbhajan Singh, owned the tenanted premises. S. Kuldeep Singh inherited the ownership of the tenanted premises along with other legal heirs of S. Harbhajan Singh. The monthly rent is 1 East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS.2373-2377 OF2020 M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS. ETC. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M.S. MURTHY & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.24098 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS.8884-8887 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.2203 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.256 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS.8888-8891 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.1584 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.980 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.8872 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.OF2023 (ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.19266 OF2022 1 JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.Permission to file special leave petitions is granted in Diary No.19266 of 2022.2. Delay condoned.3. Leave granted.4. Aggriev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2023@SLP (C) NOs. 34255-34256 OF2015THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M. RAMA RAO & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) ORDER VIKRAM NATH, J.Leave granted 2. Despite service of notice, none of the respondents have put in appearance as such the matter has been heard ex parte.3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has assailed the correctness of judgments and orders dated 12.06.2014 and 29.04.2014 passed by Division 2 Bench of the High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh whereby the writ petitions were allowed and the order dated 28.11.2011 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad in a batch of applications (leading case O.A.No.283 of 2010) was set aside upholding the validity of Government orders which had been set aside by the Tribunal.4. The State of Andhra Pradesh had issued G.O.Ms. No.3 dated 10.01.2000 providing f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2357 of 2017 Government of NCT of Delhi Appellant Versus Union of India Respondent 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI A. The Reference .............................................................................................. 4 B. Submissions ............................................................................................... 11 C. Interpretation of Article 239AA: The 2018 Constitution Bench judgment ... 15 (a) Delhi: A Sui Generis model ..................................................................... 15 (b) Legislative and executive power of the Legislative Assembly of NCTD .. 19 (c) Insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories ................... 23 D. The class of Union territories ......................................................................... 30 E. Maintaining the balance of local interest and national interest ........................ 35 F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1682-1683 OF2022M.K. RAJAGOPALAN ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. PERIASAMY PALANI GOUNDER . RESPONDENT(S) & ANR. WITH C.A. No.1756/2022 C.A. No.1759/2022 C.A. No.1757/2022 C.A. No.1807/2022 C.A. No.1810/2022 C.A. No.1827/2022 JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Preliminary and brief outline .............................................................................. 2 Particulars of the proceedings and the parties .................................................. 7 The relevant factual and background aspects ................................................ 13 Initiation of CIRP ................................................................................................... 14 CoC Meetings and ancillary proceedings .............................................................. 16 Resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) .................... 26 Disapproval of the Appellate Tribunal (N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.421 OF2019Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Ors. Respondent(s) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) No.777 OF2020Manoj Kumar Nagar Appellant(s) Versus Union of India Respondent(s) AND WRIT PETITION (C) No.712 OF2020Raj Kumar Verma Appellant(s) Versus Union of India Respondent(s) Writ Petition (C) No.421 of 2019 Page 1 of 74 JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Writ Petition (C) No.421 of 2019 1. By way of this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, filed by the writ petitioner Moser Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2013) as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is also prayed to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus so as to leave the stat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 309 OF2023P. V. NIDHISH & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present appeal1 was heard finally, with the consent of counsel for parties. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment of the Kerala High Court2 rejecting their petition under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereafter Cr. PC). They had, through those proceedings, sought a direction to quash a criminal complaint instituted against them. I2 The appellants urge that one P.M. Mammu Haji leased two shop rooms (numbered as municipal numbers VII/214 and VII/215- hereafter the premises), 1 Crl. A. No.309 / 2023. 2 Dated 03.03.2016 in Crl. MC No.5072/2015. 2 long ago (in 1916), before the coming into force of the Wakf Act. Norman Printing Bureau (hereafter the Bureau) was a concern of Achuthan Nair; it was functioning in the premises. A partnership ...
Tag this Judgment!