Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
1. The applicant was working as Superintendent with the Respondent No.2, namely, the National Gallery of Modern Art, Jaipur House, New Delhi. When the respondents were in the process of establishing a branch of the Respondent No. 2 in Bangalore in April/May, 2008, it decided, vide Annexure A-2 letter dated 13.02.2008, to transfer one post of Keeper/Deputy Keeper and one post of Superintendent to Bangalore Branch for a period of two years or till the sanction of the regular staff for that Branch whichever is earlier. Accordingly, one Smt. Rehana Shah holding the post of Keeper/Deputy Keeper was transferred there in order to take charge of the accounting functions of the said branch. Likewise, the applicant was also transferred for a period of two years vide Annexure A-4 letter dated 13.04.2008. He handed over the charge to one Shri Zile Singh, UDC working under him and got relieved from his duty. However, after joining the Branch Office at Bangalore, he was facing serious health problem...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A): 1. Dr. Ashok Kumar Sharma and another, applicants herein, have assailed the Government of Uttar Pradesh recommendation dated 27.03.2010 (Annexure-A1 Colly), 22.05.2010, 08.09.2010 and Central Government order thereon dated 10.09.2010 (page 46) whereby the Non State Civil Services (NSCS) officers have been denied their rightful induction in the IAS due to cadre review and restructuring. It is the case of the applicants that there were certain directions contained in the judgment of the Lucknow Bench dated 06.09.2010, on the basis of which the Central Government granting an erroneous approval on 10.09.2010 diverted 11 vacancies earmarked for the Non State Civil Services (NSCS) Officers to the State Civil Services (SCS) officers. The applicants have, therefore, approached this Tribunal with following relief(s):- “a. Quash and set aside the letter dated 27.03.2010 issued by the Principal Secretary, Government of UP to the DOPT, Government of Indi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
1. Dr. S.N. Sharma and six others have filed this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking to declare the order dated 09.06.2004 (Annexure-A) as arbitrary and discriminatory. The action of the respondents in not taking the necessary steps in order to extend the benefits of Flexible Complementing Scheme (In short 'FCS') to the applicants is also stated to be arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, as the applicants are eligible for grant of the benefits of the above said FCS with effect from the date since when the same has been given to other R&D scientific employees under the respondents with all consequential benefits thereof within a stipulated time frame.2. During the course of arguments, learned Counsel for applicants has referred to Scheme/Office Memorandum on the subject 'Reorganisation of working in Scientific Department' (Annexure A-3) dated 28.05.1986. The same deals with providing a better ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
2. The applicant, after due selection by the Selection Committee, was appointed as Senior Scientific Officer (Biology) in the scale of pay of Rs. 8,000-13500 (Group `A) by the Lt. Governor of NCT of Delhi vide order No. F19/7/96-Hom-111/23-36 dated 5.1.1999 in the Forensic Science Laboratory (for short `FSL) of the Government of NCT, Delhi on deputation basis. He joined that post on 4.3.1999. The deputation was originally for one year which was extendable further as per the respondents Order No. F.104/FSL/Estt./98 dated 5.3.1999. Respondent No.1 virtually extended the applicants deputation period from time to time.3. The applicant claims to have qualified M. Sc in Biotechnology and B.Sc with Botany, Zoology and Chemistry. He has also obtained Ph. D degree and contributed so many articles to Science and Forensic Science Publications. He participated in Conferences relating to Forensic Science. The applicant applied for the post of Senior Scientific Officer (Biology) in response to Resp...
Tag this Judgment!