State - Year 2012 - Judgments

Nov 09 2012 (HC)

State of Punjab ..Respondent Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

..... 2012 date of decision 09 11 2012 kamaljit kaur petitioner versus state of punjab respondent coram hon ble mrs justice daya chaudhary ..... mr gaurav garg dhuriwala d a g punjab for the respondent state daya chaudhary j oral the present petition has been filed under ..... the petitioner petitioner is in custody since 13 08 2012 learned state counsel on instructions from asi balkaran criminal misc not m 31732 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 2012 (HC)

State of Punjab ..Respondent Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-20-2012

..... date of decision 20 11 2012 sukhwinder singh kaka petitioner versus state of punjab respondent coram hon ble mrs justice daya chaudhary present ..... mr gaurav garg dhuriwala d a g punjab for the respondent state daya chaudhary j oral the present petition has been filed under ..... fixed for criminal misc not m 28330 o 2 evidence learned state counsel has not disputed the custody period but opposes the bail .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2012 (HC)

State of Punjab and Others ..Respondents Vs. State of Punjab and Other ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-23-2012

..... date of decision 23 11 2012 ajit singh and others petitioners versus state of punjab and others respondents coram hon ble mrs justice daya ..... mr gaurav garg dhuriwala d a g punjab for the respondent state mr rahul jaswal advocate for respondents no 2 and 3 daya ..... as well as injured have also suffered their statements wherein they have stated that they have no objection in quashing of the fir in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2012 (HC)

State of Punjab and Another ..Respondents Vs. State of Punjab and Anot ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-23-2012

..... of decision 23 11 2012 avtar singh and others petitioners versus state of punjab and another respondents coram hon ble mrs justice daya ..... who is also injured the complainant has given an affidavit stating therein that he does not want to proceed further against the ..... as well as the complainant respondent all of them have stated that the statement is without any pressure or coercion moreover the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2012 (HC)

State of Haryana ..Respondent Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-13-2012

..... petitioners mr pradeep virk d a g haryana for the respondent state mr sunil panwar advocate for the complainant daya chaudhary j ..... court the factum of compromise has been affirmed complainant shweta has stated therein that a compromise has been effected with the accused ..... learned counsel for the petitioners the complainant respondent no 2 has stated that she has no objection in quashing of the fir in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2012 (HC)

Divisional Controller Gujarat State Road Transport Vs. Ahmedabad Divis ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-05-2012

..... alleged incident of accident on 18 10 2004 allegedly involving respondent while he was plying state road transport corporation s bus and it was alleged that he had committed misconduct of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 2012 (HC)

Bihar State Financial Corporation Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Court: Patna

Decided on: May-24-2012

..... 7666 of 2011 in letters patent appeal no 1658 of 2011 bihar state financial corporation patna appellant s versus the state of bihar ors respondent s appearance for the appellant s mr .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 2012 (HC)

“learned Counsel for the Petitioner States That the Vs. the State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-18-2012

..... no 23414 of 2011 date of decision 18 12 2012 jitwant singh petitioner versus the state of punjab others respondents coram hon ble mr justice tejinder singh dhindsa present mr ss ..... petition was dismissed as not pressed in the following terms learned counsel for the petitioner states that the controvers raised through the instant writ petition has been compromised by the parties .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2012 (HC)

KERALA STATE CEMENT DEALER'S WELFARE ASSOCiATiON Vs. THE DiRECTOR GENE ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-31-2012

..... pousha 193 wp c no 26769 of 2012 u petitioner kerala state cement dealer s welfare association pookkottur valluvambram p o malappuram district ..... k rakesh respondent s 1 the director general of police the state police chief police head quarters trivandrum pin 695001 2 kerala cement ..... the petitioner association has 89 members at various place of the state and the same is formed when the decisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 2012 (HC)

The State of Punjab and Another ..Respondents Vs. the State of Punjab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-11-2012

..... 11 12 2012 mandeep singh dhillon and another petitioners versus the state of punjab and another respondents coram hon ble mrs justice ..... who has affirmed the factum of compromise and divorce she has stated in the court that the amount settled in the compromise ..... between the parties and the complainant respondent no 2 has specifically stated that the dispute between them has been settled and the amount .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

State - Judgment Search Results