Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state universities act 2000 29 of 2001 section 12 the chancellor Page 1 of about 68,479 results (0.376 seconds)

G.S. Krishnamurthy S/O. Sri A. Chelavaiah and M.S. Muralidhara S/O Lat ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ594; ILR2007(4)Kar4061; 2007(4KCCR2327; 2007(6)AIRKarR254

..... disciplinary authority for the purpose of that proceeding is immediately subordinate.9. the karnataka state universities act, 1976 was repealed and a new enactment viz., karnataka state universities act, 2000 (act 29/2001) (in short, 'the act') has been enacted. according to section 12 of the act, the governor of karnataka shall, by virtue of his office, be the chancellor ..... and head of the university. according to section 15(2) of the act, the vice - chancellor shall be ..... with a judicial function. again the kerala high court in rev. sr. mary angela v. state of kerala (1981 lab ic (ker) 148 (db) with reference to section 7(6) of the calicut university act, 1975 held that the chancellor is the appellate authority against any order of dismissal passed by the .....

Leelawati Mishra and Suresh Prasad Vs. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sansk ...

Court : Patna

..... within the period of 30 days since decision by the governing body and vice chancellor acted in the matter in exercise of his power under section 10(12) of the bihar state universities act, 1976 which authorizes the vice chancellor to act when the syndicate or the academic council is not in session and he is satisfied that ..... 1996. thereupon, respondent no. 7 preferred an appeal/representation before the university on 15.10.1996. for considering such appeal a committee of three members holding high posts in the university was constituted and on considering the report of such committee dated 12.8.2000 (annexure-b) the order dated 15.1.2001 (annexure-a) was ..... issued by registrar of the university under the orders of the vice chancellor.6. learned counsel for the university submitted that dates furnished by university would show that the appeal/representation of respondent no. 7 .....

Amarkant Rai Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the college has no authority to make any appointment on any post on daily wages as per the legislative scheme under section 10(6) of bihar state universities act, 1976. it was submitted that three members committee scrutinized the documents available on record and rejected claim of the appellant for regularization and the high court rightly ..... the appointment of the appellant was made by the principal who is not a competent authority to make such appointment and is in violation of the bihar state universities act and hence the appointment is illegal appointment, it is pertinent to note that the appointment of the appellant as night guard was done out of necessity ..... 2002 and 12.07.2004 recommended for absorption of the appellant against the two vacant posts. in pursuance of the high court order in cwjc no.5774/2000, he was given opportunity to appear before the three members committee constituted by the vice-chancellor for consideration of his claim for regularization of services, but the .....

Dr. Arjun Prasad Sinha Vs. Hon'ble Chancellor Jharkhand, University Ra ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR651(Jhr)]

..... jharkhand was created pursuant to the bihar reorganization act, 2000. on 13.12.2000, the state of jharkhand adopted the bihar state university act, 1976, with modification for the state of jharkhand. now this act is known as jharkhand state universities act. the state of jharkhand has not passed any act for adopting the bihar state university (constituent colleges) service commission act, 1987. the state of jharkhand has not established jharkhand state university service commission for making recommendations for appointment .....

T.C. Misra Vs. Chancellor, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Tec ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1814

..... of the agriculture engineering department of the university. the board of management of the university in its meeting held on 28.1.2000 appointed the petitioner in agriculture engineering college, etawah. 4. in para 8 of the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner wrote a letter dated 29.8.2000 to the chief personal officer mentioning various ..... preferred a representation, dated 12.1.2001 under section 23 of the act before the chancellor. in para 13 it is alleged that in view of the letter of the petitioner dated 29.8.2000 pointing out several irregularities, the vice chancellor of the university has become very annoyed with the petitioner and transferred him to advance ..... 27.11.2001 was passed vide annexure-19. the petitioner filed a writ petition which was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy under section 23 of the act before the chancellor. the petitioner made a representation to the chancellor which was rejected by order dated 19.4.2002, annexure-23. it is alleged in .....

Siddhu Kanhu University Etc. Vs. Dr. Arjun Prasad Sinha and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR1(Jhr)]

..... to be in the state of bihar, governed by the bihar state universities act and the service commission act. the siddhu kanhu university, the requisitionist, fell within the state of jharkhand. on 13.12.2000, a notification was issued adapting the bihar state universities act in terms of section 85, part x, of the bihar re- organisation act with the modification that the act thereafter, be called 'the jharkhand state universities act, 2000'. it was provided that ..... in the place of the expression, 'chancellor, university of .....

Habib Educational and Welfare Society's M.S. College of Law and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

..... its wisdom has issued a resolution dated 29th april 2015, as per section 82(1) of the maharashtra universities act, 1994 whereby all non agricultural universities in state of maharashtra have been directed to prepare and submit to the state government their perspective plan with recommendations within a period of three months from the date of issuance of said ..... of total intake capacity of the students, around 26% seats were lying vacant. 5. i respectfully say that under section 82 (5) of the maharashtra universities act, 1994, the state government has absolute discretion to grant or reject permission to open a new college or institution, taking into account (i) the ..... has produced a note on legal issues and the following judgments in support of the submissions and are read and referred also: (1) ghaziabad development authority v. union of (air 2000 sc 2003) (2) sindhi education society v. govt (nct of delhi) (2010) 8 scc 49) (3) bajaj hindustan limited v. sir shad lal enterprises limited and .....

Shailendra Kumar Singh Vs. Avadh University, Faizabad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1982All73

..... debarred from appearing at the future examination for the year 1981.3. sub-section (1) of 3. 29 of the uttar pradesh state universities act provides that there shall be an examinations committee in the university the constitution of which shall be as may be provided for in the ordinances. sub-section (3) of that section stipulates that the ..... petitioner nor was he ever asked to show cause as to why the penalty in question should not be imposed on him. the submission on behalf of the university, however, was that the petitioner had reproduced verbatim paragraphs after paragraphs from a book captioned vishwa hi prachin sabhtyain' by sri ram goyal while answering the ..... of using unfair means at any such examination'.4. so by reason of sub-section (4) of section 29 of the act the examinations committee may lawfully debar an examinee from future examinations of the university, if in its or his opinion, such examinee is guilty of using unfair means at any such examination. before debarring an .....

Manish SarIn Vs. Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1997All232

..... proceeding for adopting unfair means in the examination are contained in section 29(1)(d) of the u. p. state universities act as applicable to mahatma gandhi vidyapeeth, varanasi therein after referred to as the university) provides that there should be a examination committee which shall have amongst other power to constitute a sub-committee for ..... into the cases or proceeding with regard to the allegation against the examinee for adopting unfair means and for awarding punishment statute 8.07 of the university 1st statute provides that on the recommendation of the examination committee a candidates may be prohibited from appearing in more or some future examination, if he ..... the petitioner the order cancelling the result is unsustainable. he also relied on the decision in the case of mohd. raufulzam v. vice-chancellor, aligarh muslim university, 1992 uplb and ec642: (air 1993 all 136) in respect of the contention that principles of natural justice requires that the petitioner should be shown .....

Basant Kumar Vs. University of Allahabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All33

..... committee is an order of a tribunal or of a body purported to be a tribunal in exercise or purported exercise of the jurisdiction of a tribunal under state universities act.26. in the context of the aforesaid rule another word which requires consideration is import of the word 'purported'. the word 'purported' has been defined ..... has to embrace in itself all statutory authorities who are conferred with a jurisdiction to decide a particular issue for which the body is constituted. under the state universities act, the examination committee is a body constituted for takingdecision in regard to the matter of conducting an examination including the power to deal with a disputed ..... word 'tribunal' is not defined under the rules of the court. they are to be understood in reference to the context of the particular statute. in the state universities act, the word 'tribunal' has also not been defined. since the rules do not define the word 'tribunal', general meaning of the 'tribunal' is to be looked .....