Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india amendment act 2007 section 9 amendment of section 36 Court: kerala Page 4 of about 785 results (0.135 seconds)

Chakiat Agencies (P) Ltd., Represented by Its Director M. Jairam Vs. S ...

Court : Kerala

..... the taxation act. 13. referring to the law declared by the apex court in air 1992 sc 1371 (m/s. central coal fields ltd. vs. state of orissa) and air 1992 sc 1376 (union of india vs. chowgule and co. pvt. ltd.), the bench observed that actual user was not necessary and what was material was whether the vehicle was 'adapted for ..... making authorities to have the said provisions amended, is having little or nil significance, from the point of view of taxation, which is governed by an enactment by the state and the state is very much at liberty to tax any type of vehicle, by virtue of the charging provision under section 3 of the taxation act. it was also open for ..... down by the apex court in air 1964 sc 1667 (cited supra), air 1975 sc 17 (bolani ores ltd. vs. state of orissa), air 1979 sc 798( mahindra and mahindra ltd. v. union of india) and air 1931 pc 149 (secretary of state vs. hindustan co.op. insurance society ltd.), the learned judge observed that 'no deletion or repeal of the earlier act .....

Excel Glasses Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ330Ker

..... and enjoyment in identification with important events for celebration of a festival. provisions for paid festival holidays are intrinsically connected with the relevant directive principles of state policy, which the state is bound to achieve. objects behind the amendment act are, (i) to provide wages even if the holiday falls during strike or illegal lock-out ..... if two views are possible, presumption may be in favour of constitutionality (v.m. syed mohammad & co. and anr. v. state of andhra -(air) 1954-sc-314 and madhubhai amathalal gandhi v. union of india- (air) 1961 sc 21). in pronouncing on the the constitutional validity of a statue, court is not concerned with the wisdom ..... like article 19, under article 14 also, burden may be on the state to affirmatively establish not only the rational principle, on which classification is founded, but correlate it to the objects sought to be achieved, that is reasonableness (nakara v. union of india (1983-i-llj-104 but, as held in anant mills co, v .....

Siemens Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2002]125STC544(Ker)

..... option except in cases where there is no transfer of goods at all.10. now, we may consider the decision of the supreme court in steel authority of india ltd. v. state of orissa and ors. ((2000) 118 stc 297. a three-member bench of the supreme court was considering the provisions in the orissa sales tax act. deduction ..... in that view of the matter, we have no hesitation in rejecting the contention advanced on behalf of the state'.17. the state mainly relied on the earlier decision of the supreme court in state of kerala and anr. v. builders' assn. of india and ors., (1997) 104 stc 134. in that case, the supreme court upheld the earlier provision and ..... of tax only on the taxable turnover excluding turnover relatable to the sale in the course of inter-state trade, outside-state sale, sale in the course of import and other permissible deductions. the supreme court in steel authority of india ltd. v. state of orissa and ors. ((2000) 118 stc 297) held that a provision designed to collect tax .....

Chirayinkeezhu Service Co-Operative Bank Vs. K.Santhosh

Court : Kerala

..... labour court were ultra vires section 69 of the 1969 act. in this judgment, following the judgments of this court in a.r.nagar service co- operative bank v. state of kerala [2010 (1) klt55 and thodupuzha taluk general marketing co-operative society v. michael sebastian [2010 (1) klt939, taking the view that the labour ..... brought within the scope of sub-section (2). it is trite that if under the vii schedule to the constitution of india, a state is empowered to legislate on a particular subject, the state is also empowered to legislate creating forums for resolution of disputes arising thereunder. however, if such a legislation comes in conflict ..... the force of law, whichever be the source from which they emanate ' statutory, judicial or customary - the only exception, in the context, being the constitution of india. this means, once brought into force the sub- section will, subject to the constitution, operate with full vigour, notwithstanding any statute or judicial decision or any other .....

U.Suresh Kumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... is further argued that the sbt is a subsidiary of the state bank of india and even state bank of india is only a government company with 58.7% share held by government of india. the sbt is a separate entity controlled by state bank of india. state bank of india is a company constituted under the state bank of india act. even though state bank of india is an undertaking under the central government, sbt, which is admittedly ..... by ext.p7 by the deputy accountant general on 14.3.2011 saying that since the petitioner was in receipt of pension from sbt, which is substantially owned by state bank of india, a state owned public sector undertaking, his salary was regulated in tune with regulation 4(1)(ii), which provides for the categories of persons whose salary payable by the commission would .....

Jacob Philip Vs. State Bank of Travancore and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1973Ker51

..... bank of india are owned by the government. we find too, that a subsidiary bank such as the state bank of ..... travancore, is not one owned or controlled by the state. we were taken through the provisions of the state bank of india act, 1955. the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, and the reserve bank of india act, 1934. the position disclosed is that the reserve bank of india owns not less than 55% of the shares in the state bank of india, and cent per cent of the shares in the reserve .....

M/S. Harrisons Malayalam Ltd Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissio ...

Court : Kerala

..... payment is made by a cheque, it should be drawn only on the local bank of the place in which deposits are made. provident further that where there is no branch of the reserve bank or the state bank of india at the station where the factory or other establishment is situated, the employer shall pay ..... to the fund the amount mentioned above by means of reserve bank of india [government drafts at par] separately on account of contributions and ..... in the business of planting tea and rubber, delayed payment of contributions under the act because of the financial difficulties, which plagued the plantation industry in india, particularly in kerala, a decade or so ago. each regional provident fund commissioner (hereinafter referred to as the commissioner), having jurisdiction over the particular plantation .....

Sachidanandhan Vs. Vijesh and Another

Court : Kerala

Reported in :

Cases Relied:
Dilip Bastimal Jain V Baban Bhanudas Kamble and others [AIR 2002 Bom 279].
Vimala Ammal V C. Susheela [AIR 1991 Mad 209].
Dwarka Prasad Singh v. Harikant Prasad Singh [(1973) 1 SCC 179 :. AIR 1973 SC 655].
P.P.S Pillai V Catholic Syrian Bnak [2000(3) KLT 629].
Peter Cherian v. Abraham [2007 (4) KLT 680].
Satheedevi v. Prasanna [2010(2) KLT 642 (SC)].
Ali Rowther v. Kochupennu [1986 KLT 718].
Kali Charanv. Janak Deo [A.I.R. 1932 Allahabad 694].
Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal [A.I.R.1982 S.C.818].
Potter v. Sanders (6 Ha. 1).
Daniels v. Davison (17 Ves 433).
Holmes v. Powell (8 De G.M. and G. 572).
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders and Investors (P) Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC 397.
(Kafiladdin case, AIR p. 68).
R.C. Chandiok v. Chuni Lal Sabharwal:AIR 1971 SC 1238:(1970) 3 SCC 140.
SCR p. 369 in Durga Prasad v. Deep Chand viz.
S.V.R. Mudaliar v. Rajabu F. Buhari, AIR 1995 SC 1607.

Cases Referred:
Bankim Chandra v. Anand Bazar Patrika [AIR (37) 1950 Calcutta 128].
Thanga Pandiyan v. S.R.Periaswami Thevar [1953 KHC 196: 1953 KLT 475, 2015 KHC 90.
Mohandas K. K. and others V Thankamma Pillai [2015 KHC 90].
Durga Prasad and Anr. v. Deep Chand and Ors. [AIR 1954 SC 75].
Appukuttan v. Kamalakshi [1996(2) KLT 977].
Dilip Bastimal Jain V Baban Bhanudas Kamble and others [AIR 2002 Bom. 279],
W.P. 6225 of 2007 of Bombay High Court, Chendivel R vs G Damodaran and others [AIR 2015 Mad 96], 2010(2) KLT 642 (SC).
Krishna Chandra Kabiraj and others V Sankaran Kabiraj and others [AIR 1950 Calcutta 128].
Chendivel R vs G Damodaran and others [2015 KHC 2237: AIR 2015 Mad 96].
Vigro Industries Pvt Ltd V Venturetech Solutions P Ltd : 2012(5) CTC 359.
State Bank of India V Cracure Pharmaceuticals Ltd : 2013 STPL (Web) 939

Comparative Citation:
2016 (1) KLT 75 (SN) (C.No.79),

..... file a suit for specific performance later. relying on the judgments of the apex court in vigro industries pvt ltd v venturetech solutions p ltd : 2012(5) ctc 359 and state bank of india v cracure pharmaceuticals ltd : 2013 stpl (web) 939 it was held that, in view of order 2 rule 2, the object of which is to avoid multiplicity of ..... of rs.1,00,000/- is availed under gehan mortgage on the strength of the ext.b2 and that the original document is kept in the bank as there are arrears. in the proof affidavit dw1 stated that, loan was availed for constructing house. in the cross examination, he denied the suggestion that his versions as to availing loan and starting ..... found that the settlement deed was executed for evading the execution of sale deed. 16. ext.b1 is seen marked in the proof affidavit stating that, it is a certificate issued from the vellanikara service co-operative bank towards loan availed. on perusal of the same it is seen that, it is a copy of ext.b2 settlement deed with an .....

Kochurani Thomas Vs. The State of Kerala, represented by its Secretary ...

Court : Kerala

..... legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; a law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated with the law-making power. 34. in state bank of india (supra), the issue is whether the voluntary retirement from service would fall under the term "termination of employment" within the meaning of section 17(3) ..... of dismissal for misconduct, should be treated alike, and the benefits should also be extended alike. in support of his submissions, the learned counsel has placed reliance on state bank of india v. central board of direct taxes. (2006 (1) klt 258). 6. the learned special government pleader, on the contrary, has submitted that clause 23 has ..... 2001) 4 scc 236), hassan co-operative milk producers societies union ltd v. state of karnataka (2014 (3) klt sn 45), bhagat ram sharma v. union of india and others (air 1998 supreme court 740)and khoday distilleries ltd. and others v. state of karnataka and others ((1996) 10 scc 304). 8. the learned special government .....

The State Bank of India Vs. Dominic Thanikkal

Court : Kerala

..... to act contrary to law.8. learned counsel for the petitioner in support of her submission has relied on the division bench judgment reported in ratan kumar and others v. state bank of india and others [2013 khc2980 [parallel citation is air2013all. 115].9. we have considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.10. learned single judge ..... ).34/2015 -------------------------------------------- against the judgment in op (drt) 34/2015 dated0906-2015 ------------- appellant(s)/respondents1& 2 :- ------------------------------------ 1. the state bank of india, kunnamkulam branch, represented by its manager, p.o.kunnamkulam, thrissur district - 680 019.2. the chief manager (rural) (the authorised officer), state bank of india, regional business office, p.o.thrissur - 680 001. by adv. sri.s.easwaran respondent(s)/petitioner & respondents3& 4 :- -------------------------------------------------- 1 .....