State Bank Of India Amendment Act 2007 Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india amendment act 2007 section 8 Year: 2021 Page 1 of about 589 results (4.841 seconds)Attorney General For India Vs. Satish
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-18-2021
..... india 2007 conducted by the 8 sections 2 3 6 7 and 78 of the uk sexual offences act ..... section 5 6 7 15 of the criminal law sexual offences and related matters amendment act 2007 enacted by the republic of south africa and amendments ..... and simply in swantraj ors v state of maharashtra4 every legislation is a social ..... such cases long ago in reserve bank of india v peerless general finance and investment co .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndex Medical College Hospital And Research Center Vs. The State Of Ma ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-03-2021
..... by the state government in exercise of the powers conferred under section 12 of the act rule 10 ..... professed object of the amendment to the rules by insertion of rule 12 8 a is to ensure ..... central co operative bank v coimbatore district central co operative bank employees association and another 2007 4 scc66915 ..... a group of students who were blocking all india quota seats in second round of counselling .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-24-2021
..... banking 55 regulation amendment act 2017 by introducing section 35 aa and section 35 ab into the banking regulation act 1949 the amendment empowers the central government to authorise rbi to issue directions to any banking ..... was stated on behalf of jal that an amount of inr550crores had already been deposited and that only about 8 of the homebuyers were ..... 2007 and deed of agreement dated 27 11 2007 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEbix Singapore Pte Ltd. Vs. Committee Of Creditors Of Educomp Solution ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-13-2021
expression of interest has been issued provided that the applicant states the reasons justifying such withdrawal similarly on 25 january 2019 resolutions of members and creditors 122 under the united states bankruptcy code a restructuring plan becomes binding once it is confirmed reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no 3224 of 2020 ebix envisaged by the statute109 further the uncitral guide envisages that amendments can be made to the resolution plan after it is if any approval of shareholders is required under the companies act 2013 18 of 2013 or any other law for the failure to implement the plan would invite penal prosecution under section 74 of the ibc and a repeated cirp this will parties who 61 page 20 uncitral guide supra note 56 89 part h are statutorily bound by the impact of a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-08-2021
submission of mr nariman that the tribunal such as the state commission in deciding a lis between the appellant and the the state bank advance rate 12 the expression sbar state bank advance rate refers to the prime lending rate notified by indian governmental instrumentality provided such court of law tribunal or indian governmental instrumentality is final authority under law for such interpretation anand s argument that the appellant is obliged to seek amendment of the provisions of the power purchase agreement only in is a distribution licensee under the provisions of the electricity act 2003 with license to supply electricity all over the state involved in this appeal 152 on a conjoint reading of section 125 of the electricity act with section 100 of the to the competitive bidding process initiated by the appellant article 8 3 5 of the power purchase agreements 11 1996 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. Vs. Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-14-2021
judgment in support of the aforesaid submission mr khambata cited state bank of india and ors v s n goyal22 30 interim protection was at all necessary in this case the bank guarantee was apparently unconditional in effect the appellants have been in benara bearings and pistons limited v mahle engine components india private limited13 and in energo engineering projects limited v trf through r narayana pisharadi j held 8 even after the amendment of the act by incorporation of section 9 3 the the arbitrator arbitral tribunal by section 17 of the same act a reading of section 9 and section 17 of the to be considered in entirety by the arbitral tribunal under section 17 of the arbitration act 95 on a combined reading the appellant as on 24th december 2020 was rs 673 84 crores inclusive of interest of rs 51 11 crores 7
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Anjanamma .n Vs. N Manjunath
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-19-2021
rs 18 85 000 for both properties the plaintiff has stated that she has a share in all the suit schedule and 53 are the receipts issued by cauvery kalpatharu grameena bank aradeshahalli branch bengaluru dated 30 06 2008 and 09 09 decision of the hon ble supreme court in thomson press india ltd vs nanak 124 builders and investors p ltd others of the said act as it stood prior to 2005 amendment if a male hindu died after the commencement of the thakor through heirs air2013guj 37 becharji bapuji thakur source limitation act by b b mitra 23rd edition 49 at this stage in view of the rigor of provisions of explanation to section 6 5 of the act of 1956 a plea of 16th share but the trial court has awarded only 1 8th share in suit schedule item nos 1 to 11 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri N. Manjunath Vs. Smt. Anjanamma N
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-19-2021
filed separate written statement defendant no 4 in his written statement stated that the suit filed by the plaintiff is not 1 had raised loans by mortgaging certain properties to different banks as there was no such situation for mortgaging the suit the supreme court in the case of state bank of india vs ghamandi ram air1969sc1330 will prove useful that decision was was by birth b under the hindu law of inheritance amendment act 1929 certain female members of the joint family were thakor through heirs air2013guj 37 becharji bapuji thakur source limitation act by b b mitra 23rd edition 49 at this stage a son but the same must be harmoniously read with section 14 of the act which states that property of a have become known to the plaintiff under article 110 the 86 period of limitation for making a claim to a share
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Prameela Vs. Smt. Anjanamma N
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-19-2021
51 are the notices of termination of agreement of hypothecation state bank of mysore sadarahalli branch devanahalli taluk bangalore district both 1 had raised loans by mortgaging certain properties to different banks as there was no such situation for mortgaging the suit the parliamentary amendment vide article 254 of the constitution of india e section 6 of the act has now been amended rights 70 under the proviso to section 6 before the amendment made in the year 2005 in case a coparcener died of a deed of partition duly registered under the registration act 1908 16 of 1908 or partition effected by a decree 1963 read as under the schedule periods of limitation see sections 2 j and 3 first division suits time from which the suit as against entire suit schedule item no 13 81 the memo filed on 27 01 2014 reads as under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManjari Tanty @ Laria Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer And Sub Col ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-27-2021
this court directed the principal district judge sundargarh in the state of odisha to conduct an enquiry regarding the date of 1 in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no s 6111 of2021 arising 1 in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no s 6111 of2021 arising infructuous learned counsel further submits that once the application for amendment seeking change of date of death of kuladhara has been the reference court under section 30 of the land acquisition act 1894 the act the acquisition proceedings in reference to the notification dated 28 04 2010 published by state government under section 4 of the act and the subject land of one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT