Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state agricultural credit corporations act 1968 section 7 management Court: himachal pradesh Page 6 of about 178 results (1.173 seconds)

Nov 25 1981 (HC)

Bhawani Parshad Kapur Vs. the Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... the industrial concern without the permission of the board, where such removal is apprehended. (2) an application under sub-section (1) shall state the nature and extent of the liability of the industrial concern to the financial corporation, the ground on which it is made and such other particulars as may be prescribed.' 10. section 32 of the act next provides ..... till the date of its realization.2. the facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal may now be stated in brief:--the respondent is a body corporate established under section 3 of the act. one of the functions of this corporation is to grant loans or advances to industrial concerns. the appellant who runs an industrial concern under the name ..... used in sub-section (6) of section 32 came up for consideration before the supreme court in the case of gujarat state financial corporation v. natson reported in air 1978 sc 1765, where their lordships observed as under (at p. 1769):--'sub-section (6) of section 32 of the act has to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1985 (HC)

Smt. Ram Murti Devi and ors. Vs. Ralla Ram Tulsi Ram and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1987HP1

..... granted under part x and having the debt specified therein, or (iv)-(v) xxxxxxxx (2) the word 'debt' in sub-section (1) includes payable in respect of land used for agricultural purposes'. 26. the high courts of allahabad, calcutta, madras, patna, andhra pradesh and peshawar have taken a view that no succession certificate is required to be produced by the legal ..... execution to another court, the court which passed such decree shall send the decree directly to such other court whether or not such other court is situated in the same state, but the court to which the decree is sent for execution shall, if it has no jurisdiction to execute the decree, send it to the court having such jurisdiction. 12 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1971 (HC)

Pinja Vs. Hoshiara

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1971HP21

..... land occupied without the consent of the landlord shall be liable to pay for the use or occupation of that land at the rate of rent payable in the preceding agricultural year, or, if rent was not payable in the year, at such rate as the court may determine to be fair and equitable.'7. it is manifest, this section is ..... has to start and continue without the consent of the landlord. because no rent can be stated to have been fixed between him and the landlord, the legislature wanted him to pay for use and occupation at the rate of rent payable in the preceding agricultural year for that land, or, if rent was not payable in that year, at such rate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1994 (HC)

Kailash District Co-op. Marketing and Supply Federation Ltd. and ors. ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1995HP48

..... book various objects of the federation have been recorded. one of the objects referred in bye-laws is as under:--'to arrange for the grading and packing of agricultural produce of the members or purchased by the federation.'22. similarly, at page 535 of the paper book the bye-laws of the kailash district cooperative marketing and ..... goods were sold on commission basis. it was also pleaded that goods were sold on first come first served basis and whatever price was realized, used to be credited to the account of consigner and he was paid the amount after deducting the commission and other charges. it was very specifically pleaded that defendant no. 3 was ..... pathar. during cross-examination he deposed that bisheshar nath, tara chand, narinder singh plaintiff and des raj were the persons present at the time of bargain. he stated that bargain struck in his presence and bisheshar nath was present throughout. he also disclosed that when potatoes were sold by way of outright sale a voucher showing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1977 (HC)

Tralok Chand and anr. Vs. Arjun Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978HP2

..... and passed an order of remand. the contention which was raised before the high court was based on the decision of the same high court in mahmood v. kerala corporation (air 1945 mad 181) where it was held that there was an ouster of the jurisdiction of the civil court because after the decree was passed by the civil ..... by special legislation, hidayatullah c. j. speaking for the court has formulated seven principles, the following two of which, are relevant for our purpose. these two principles are stated in the said decision as under :--'(1) where the statute gives a finality to the orders of the special tribunals the civil court's jurisdiction must be held to be ..... (4) (c) read with section 9 (6) to which we have adverted. in these circumstances, we have no hesitation in holding that to the extent of the question stated in section 9 (1), the jurisdiction of the settlement officer and of the tribunal are exclusive and that the civil court are barred from trying or retrying the same question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 1974 (HC)

Smt. Raj Dulari Vs. Tarsem Singh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... . he said that he wag not a member of the coparcenary with his father nor was the property coparcenary that they were saini agriculturists and were governed by agricultural custom obtaining amongst the sainis of paonta tehsil.2. several issues were framed and the trial court held that the consideration of rs. 10,000/- was not ..... relevant for determination of the question in the instant case.7. under section 3 of the suits valuation act as amended in its application to himachal pradesh, the state government is required to make rules for determining the value of land for purposes of jurisdiction in the suits mentioned in the court-fees act. section 7, ..... of the learned district judge.12. the second point is with regard to custom. it has been held by both the courts that the parties are governed by agricultural custom obtaining amongst the sainis to which community the parties belong. learned counsel has contended that the respondent had failed to prove what that custom was and therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1994 (HC)

H.R.T.C. Staff Union Vs. H.R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1001HP

..... the amounts to be carried from time to time the credit thereof and the application of the monies, can be determined by the corporation. the utilisation of a fund intended for one purpose, for another, cannot be done by the corporation, without the previous approval of the state government.17. section 30 enables the state government to specify the percentage of the net profits for ..... bank (after nationalisation) or other financial institutions providing credit and subject to the control of the reserve bank of india. from these provisions, it follows that the corporation is not free to go about borrowing as it likes to satisfy its requirements, but even that had been curtailed in that prior approval of the state government, should be obtained.14. under section 27 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1994 (HC)

Punjab National Bank Vs. Surinder Singh Mandyal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996HP1

..... air 1970 sc 161.25. division bench of orissa high court in a case pertaining to the loan transaction between the orissa state financial corporation and its debtor, which was governed by the provisions of the state financial corporation act also applied this rule by following the ratio of the judgment in meghraj's case (supra).26. in view of the ..... any interest whatever may be the agreement between the parties.44. similar view as that of delhi high court was taken by the punjab and haryana high court in food corporation of india v. samana co-operative marketing-cum-processing society ltd. samans mandi, 1987 (1) current law journal (civil), criminal and revenue) 778 (wrongly referred to ..... cancelled or in any way affected by the fact that at any time the said accounts may show no liability against the borrower or may even show a credit in his favour but shall continue to be a guarantee and remain in operation in respect of all subsequent transaction.''13. the guarantee hereby given shall not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1999 (HC)

Shivalik Steel and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Workmen's Compensation Commiss ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2000)ACC365,2000ACJ944,[2000(86)FLR406],(2000)ILLJ1456HP

..... seem to be warranted in the teeth of the materials said to have been produced by the very authorities of the employees' state insurance corporation and marked in evidence, once the establishment is covered by the scheme under the employees' state insurance act thereafter any and every person, who answers the description of an 'employee' and in respect of the 'employment injury' suffered ..... act and he became entitled to the benefit of section 46(c) of the said act. he approached the employees' state insurance corporation and obtained the benefit available to him under the employees' state insurance act. thereafter, he served a notice on the management demanding rs. 7 lacs as compensation and followed the same by filing an application under the provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1996 (HC)

Parkash Nath, Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1997)141CTR(HP)52,[1997]225ITR305(HP)

..... justified in quashing the proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure. (please see : raj kapoor v. state : 1980crilj202 ; municipal corporation of delhi v. ram kishan rohtagi : 1983crilj159 and madhavrao jiwaji rao scindia v. sambhajirao chandrojirao angre : 1988crilj853 ).20. though the present proceedings are ..... by the commissioner of income-tax (appeals), shimla, as stated by the respondents in their reply-affidavit(s). separate notices to show cause dated november 12, 1991, under section 276cc of the act (annexure 'p ..... proceedings were initiated against each petitioner and by separate orders dated march 16, 1992 (annexure 'p-2' in each petition), penalty of the amount stated therein was imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the act. separate appeal filed by each petitioner against the order imposing penalty has also been dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //