Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state agricultural credit corporations act 1968 section 7 management Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 178 results (0.194 seconds)

Dec 29 1998 (HC)

Jagjeet Singh and Dile Ram Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas629(HP)

..... ) to any agreement relating to a loan, advance, grant, subsidy, stipend or scholarship given to him under that agreement or relating to credit in respect of, or relating to hire purchase of, goods sold by the state government or the corporation by way of financial assistance ; or (ii) to any agreement relating to a loan, advance, grant or subsidy given under that agreement ..... vocational or technical training; or (ii) for the construction of residential building ; or (iii) for providing drinking water kuhl or pipe line, or (iv) for the development of animal husbandry, agriculture or horticulture ; or (v) for establishing, expanding, modernising, renovating or running any village or cottage industry, industrial undertaking or agro-industry ; or (vi) for purposes of any other kind of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 1992 (HC)

Virender Gautam and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1992HP53

..... constituent members. annexure 5/a is the copy of circular dated january 18, 1984 issued by the national bank for agriculture and rural development (in short nabard) addressed to the registrars cooperative societies in all the states and union territories notifying the policy governing the financial activities under section 21 (1)(v) read with section 21(3)( ..... objects of the bank is to serve as balancing centre and clearing house for co-operative societies in its area of operation and to organise the provision of credit for agriculturists, artisans and labourers and others in its area of operation. one of its aim is also to make loans and advances with or without ..... to be governed by the other terms and conditions laid down by the national co-operative development corporation. 24. it was contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as no terms and conditions had been prescribed by the state government, therefore, the bank was within its rights to take a decision of returning the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1971 (HC)

Budhi Singh Vs. Sewa Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1971HP29

..... displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act of 1954, their lordships observed:--'the above provisions apply only to properties which are under the control of the managing officers or managing corporations. they do not apply to properties which have ceased to be evacuee properties.'section 19, referred to above, reads as follows:--'19. (1) notwithstanding anything contained in ..... . in my opinion, the courts below have not erred in holding that the effect of the act 31 of 1950 was to override the provisions of local or state laws as held in abdul sattar v. custodian, evacuee property, (air 1958 andh pra 317). the result was that so long as the property remained vested in ..... to which the provisions of rule 58 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) rules, 1955, applied. this rule lays down:--'where any person is allotted agricultural land under these rules, he shall, subject to the provisions of any local or special law fixing the ceiling of or otherwise regulating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2003 (HC)

Co-operative Forest Societies Union of District Kangra Vs. State of H. ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003HP137

..... jurisdiction. the value for court fees and the value for jurisdiction must, no doubt, be the same in such cases, but it is the value for court fees stated by the plaintiff that is of primary importance. it is from this value that the value for jurisdiction must be determined. the result is that it is the amount ..... if so, to what effect? opd 10. whether the rights of the plaintiff and pro forma defendants, if any, stand extinguished consequent upon the land having been vested in the state under the h. p. village common land (vesting and utilisation) act? opd 11. relief. 5. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone ..... income derived from the forest produce and such share was being paid to the co-operative societies by the then state of punjab. however, since after the reorganisation of states and the concerned forest areas becoming a part of the state of himachal pradesh, such share has not been paid to the various co-operative societies in spite of repeated demands .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2005 (HC)

The Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2005HP39

..... to this witness, the unit was closed, after it came in production.29. p.w. 3 rajinder prashad jain, senior manager (project) of the plaintiff corporation states that accounts of the defendant company were maintained under his supervision. witness brought the original ledger of the accounts of the defendant company, in respect of the loan ..... and failed to liquidate their liability. this led to taking over of the possession of the hypothecated/mortgaged assets by the plaintiff corporation on 17-7-1999, under section 29 of the state financial corporation act, 1951. the outstanding amount against the defendants on 10-5-2000 was rs. 1,02,90,191/-. notice (ex. ..... which were taken over by the plaintiff corporation were sold for rs. 67 lacs, which were shared between the plaintiff corporation and himachal pradesh financial corporation equally and the defendant company was given credit of rs. 36,14,575/-.28. in the cross-examination, mr. bali (p.w. 1) states that the entire loan amount was released .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 1978 (HC)

Som Krishan and ors. Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979HP35

..... that at any rate as a result of the bifurcation made by the notification dated 11th may, 1978, sawindhar gram sabha had come into legal existence as a corporate body. this sawindhar gram sabha is not abolished by the impugned notification. what the impugned notification dated 5th july, 1978 seeks to do is to cancel the ..... other gram sabha areas were reorganised. we are not concerned with the other reorganised gram sabhas. but so far as chanyana gram sabha was concerned, this notification stated as under:'and the governor is further pleased to cancel the notification of even number dated 11th may, 1978 of this department vide which gram sabha chanyana ..... to the respondents and reply has been filed; the rejoinder has also been filed. the petitioners are the residents of tehsil kursog situated in mandi district of this state. they previously belonged to chanyana gram sabha which was constituted in the year 1972. this sabha consisted of 12 villages. the petitioners, however, wanted a separate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 1998 (HC)

Mehatpur Filling Station and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and or ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2003]133STC101(HP)

..... deduct tax at 2 per cent from the payments made to the petitioners therein. same view was taken by the very learned judge in another decision reported in o.c. corporation v. state of bihar [1996] 102 stc 33 (pat). a division bench of the patna high court held, while considering section 31 of the bihar finance act, 1981, as substituted ..... the return, and the dealer shall be deemed to have made the payment only on the date on which such crossed cheque, after its presentation in the bank, is actually credited into the government account and necessary receipt is issued by the bank in favour of the dealer. therefore, if a dealer, after june 1, 1992, chose to effect ..... return, and the dealer shall be deemed to have made the payment only on the date on which such crossed cheque, after its presentation in the bank, is actually credited in to the government account and necessary receipt is issued by the bank in favour of the dealer :provided further that where the payment is made through a crossed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1962 (HC)

Prithi Chand Vs. Lieutenant-governor

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962HP59

..... with what may be called wholesale trade and this in our opinion provides ample guidance to the state govt. when it comes to decide whether a particular agricultural produce should be added to, or taken out of, the schedule. the state govt. will have to consider in each case whether the volume of trade in the produce is ..... . the latest reported case of the supreme court on the point under consideration is mohammad hussain gulami mohammad v. state of bombay, air 1962 sc 97. section 29 of the bombay agricultural produce markets act provided that the state government may, by notification in the official gazette, add to, amend or cancel any of the items of ..... penalty on an examinee for his alleged misconduct.38. in the case of nathubhai dhulaji v. municipal corporation bombay, air 1959 bom 332 it was held that the authority issuing notice under section 354 of the bombay municipal corporation act has to ascertain facts objectivelyand then to satisfy himself. so long as the authority keeps himself .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2005 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh and anr. Vs. Deepa Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC194,2006ACJ1677

..... by the government?2. the facts necessary for the decision of this case are that a maruti gypsy bearing no. his 6095 was owned by nathpa jhakri power corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'njpc'). it was insured with national insurance co. ltd. the said vehicle was requisitioned by the government for election purposes. during the ..... loss, damage or liability caused, sustained or incurred during the period of requisition or commandeering by the government for any purpose'.8. in sita rani gupta v. state of assam 1989 acj 348 (gauhati), division bench of the high court of gauhati held that when the vehicle had been requisitioned under the assam requisition and control ..... purposes and for the business of the insured. there is nothing in this policy which exonerates the insurance company in case the vehicle is requisitioned by the state government. in the case before the orissa high court in durdadahya kumar samal 1988 acj 540 (orissa), there was a general exception that the company will .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1992 (HC)

Village Papers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ99HP

..... the third point and submitted, on the authority of the decisions in the cases of the members of sasamusa workers union v. state of bihar, (air) 1952 pat 210 and sindhu resettlement corporation ltd.v. industrial tribunal of gujarat, 1968-i-llj-834, that in absence of a demand and a refusal it could ..... material before the tribunal clearly showed that no such industrial dispute, as was purported to be referred by the state government to the tribunal, had ever existed between the appellant corporation and the respondents and the state government, in making a reference, obviously committed an error in basing its opinion on material which was not relevant ..... matter before the tribunal clearly showed that no such industrial dispute, as was purported to be referred by the state government to the tribunal, had ever existed between the appellant-corporation and the respondents and the state government, in making a reference, obviously committed an error in basing its opinion on material which was not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //