Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures enforcement act 1985 54 of 1985 section 17 procedure of registration Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.081 seconds)

Apr 12 2006 (HC)

Indian Hotel and Restaurants Association (AHAR), an Association duly r ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR705

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The challenge in all these petitions is to the constitutional validity of Sections 33A and 33B of the Bombay Police Act, as amended by the Bombay Police (Amendment) Act, 2005. The bill was passed by the Legislative Assembly on 21st July, 2005 and by the Legislative Council on 23rd July, 2005 and has now come into force. The Sections under challenge may be gainfully reproduced:33A(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or the rules made by the Commissioner of Police or the District Magistrate under sub-section (1) of Section 33 for the area under their respective charges, on and from the date of commencement of the Bombay Police (Amendment) Act, 2005,-(a) holding of a performance of dance, of any kind or type, in any eating house, permit room or beer bar is prohibited;(b) all performance licences, issued under the aforesaid rules by the Commissioner of Police or the District Magistrate or any other officer, as the case may be, being the Licensing Authority,...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2006 (HC)

B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-03-2006

V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. These three writ appeals are filed by (1) Mr. B. Srinivasa Reddy who is appointed as the Managing Director; (2) Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board); and (3) the State Government represented by its Secretary to the Urban Development Department respectively questioning the correctness of the order dated 10-1-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 9852 of 2004 (S-RES) (Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board Employees' Association, Dharwad and Anr. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. 2006(1) Kar. L.J. 448), holding that the appointment of B. Srinivasa Reddy, the appellant in W.A. No. 86 of 2006, as Managing Director on contract basis with effect from 1-2-2004 as per Annexure-A and his continuation in the said office for nearly two years is illegal and he is an usurper of the said public office and further issuing a writ of quo warranto ousting him from the office of the Managing Director of the Board,...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2006 (SC)

Kuldip Nayar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC3127; JT2006(8)SC1; 2006(8)SCALE257; (2006)7SCC1

..... 80 and article 84 of the constitution as also in sections 17, 18 and 19 of the rp act, 1950 and in section 3 of the rp act, 1951, which scheme guarantees the representative character ..... by the constitution (fifty-second amendment) act, 1985, with effect from 1st march 1985. the purpose of the said amendment as declared ..... assent.the above provision shows that subject to some conditions and procedural requirements, the parliament is competent to amend the constitution except, inter ..... leave it to the appropriate legislature to define the necessary standards later. whatever qualifications may be prescribed, one of ..... therefore regulate the manner in which the right has to be enforced or the remedy for enforcing it. similar view was expressed by this court ..... are enough considerations or qualifications. these considerations undoubtedly are certainly of more weight than transitory or often illusory concept of 'residence'. this court ..... registration which had been put into place by the commission. this case is different, however, because the alleged disenfranchisement is said to arise from the terms of the statute and not from the acts or omissions of the agency charged with implementing the statute.[24] o'regan j in her dissenting judgment measures ..... act.mr. rao also placed reliance on british amusements catering trades association v. west minister city council (1988) 1 all er 740, 745 d.e. (h.l.), a judgment that is said to have followed the case referred to in the preceding paragraph.54 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2006 (HC)

G. Narasimha Murthy Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-06-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD370; 2006(3)ALT433

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The question of the power of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short hereinafter referred to as 'A.P.A.T.') to condone the delay beyond the period specified under Rule 17 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 (in short hereinafter referred to as 'Rules' for the purpose of convenience) beyond the period of 30 days specified had been referred to the Full Bench in the light of the decision of yet another Full Bench in G. Narsimha Rao v. Regional Joint Director of School Education, Warangal and Ors. : 2005(2)ALT469 (FB), wherein it was held that A.P.A.T. has no jurisdiction to condone delay in filing review application in the light of the language of Rule 19 of the Rules.2. Several writ petitions are being filed as against the orders of A.P.A.T. wherein the applications moved beyond time under Rule 17 are being dismissed on the ground that A.P.A.T. has no power to condone delay beyond the specified period.3. Sri Rama Rao, the...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2006 (HC)

Pramod Bhagwan Nayak Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Reported in : (2007)1GLR796

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Pramod Bhagwan Nayak, petitioner original detenu, has filed this habeas corpus petition challenging the order dated 23-8-2005 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat City, Surat, respondent No. 2 herein. The petition was filed before this Court on 13-10-2005. When the matter was placed for hearing on 21-10-2005, this Court has issued rule. On behalf of the respondents Mr. L.R. Pujari, learned A.G.P., appears. With the consent of the parties the matter is taken up for final disposal.2. Mr. Amrish Pandya, learned Advocate, appears on behalf of Ms. Krishna U. Mishra, learned Advocate for the petitioner. He has invited my attention to the order of detention dated 23-8-2005 in which the authority has passed order under the provisions of Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the P.A.S.A. Act'). He has also invited my attention to the order of committal dated 23-10-2005 whereby the petitioner has been sent to ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2006 (HC)

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cloth Markets and Shops Board and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2006

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR5; 2006(6)BomCR739; [2007(112)FLR273]; (2007)ILLJ865Bom; 2006(6)MhLj377

J.N. Patel and Roshan Dalvi, JJ.1. The Division Bench of this Court while considering a group of petitions filed by the petitioner employers relating to the application of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other ., (Writ Petition No. 7671 of 2005) as a lead petition. The Bench was of the view that the interpretation placed in the judgment of this Court in Century Textiles and Industries Ltd., v. State of Maharashtra : (2000)IILLJ815Bom relating to Section 2 definitions defining the words 'unprotected workers' (section 2(11) and 'worker' (section 2(12) of the Mathadi Act, 1969 is in conflict with the statutory provisions enacted by the legislature and that the correctness of the decision would, therefore, merit examination by the Larger Bench. The two questions of law for determination of the controversy were formulated after considering the various provisions of the Mathadi Act, 1969 and the Schemes enacted thereunder like the Cloths Markets and Shops Unprotected Workers (Regulation o...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2006 (FN)

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant) Vs. M (Respondent ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Mar-08-2006

LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL My Lords, 1. I have had the great benefit of reading in draft the opinion of my noble and learned friend Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe. I am in complete agreement with it, and would for the reasons which he gives make the order which he proposes. My noble and learned friend's comprehensive summary of the relevant materials and authorities, for which I am greatly indebted to him, enables me to indicate quite briefly (and with no intention to derogate from his reasoning) why I agree with him. 2. Ms M. the respondent, is the mother of two children who spend the greater part of each week with their father, her former husband from whom she is divorced. Under the Child Support Act 1991 she, as the non-resident parent, is required to contribute to the costs of maintaining the children incurred by the father as the parent with care. The amount of her contribution is calculated according to complex rules laid down in regulations made under the 1991 Act, and are in import...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2006 (TRI)

R.D. Bohet S/O Sh. Bhoop Singh, Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi, Govt. of Nc ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2006

..... 1.2006, giving rise to the present oa.17. simultaneously with the criminal case a criminal prosecution was also launched under sections 7/12/13 of the prevention of corruption act, 1985, whereby at the time of grant of bail discarding the ..... unlike criminal trial, which is governed under code of criminal procedure there are sanctions and ways and means to summon and to call for the prosecution witnesses though similar provisions exist in the enforcement of witnesses rules, however not complying with the aforesaid as made ..... the constitution of india.34. insofar as rules of evidence and their applicability is concerned, it is stated that in the video recording the same standards would not apply as in a criminal trial, as in the disciplinary proceedings preponderance of probability is the rule. reliance has been ..... has reached to exercise jurisdiction under article 311(2)(b) of the constitution or not? admittedly, after registration of a criminal case against applicant and his release on bail thereof when the evidence which has been relied ..... accordingly. shri r.d. bohet, former deputy superintendent, grade-ii, tihar jail be so informed.54. if one has regard to the above, not even a whisper as to application of mind in the context of tulsi ..... measure of social justice. precedents sub silentio and without argument are of no moment. mere casual expression carry no weight at all. nor every passing expression of a judge, however eminent, can be treated as an ex cathedra statement having the weight .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2006 (HC)

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-05-2006

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

..... provisions of the code have been amended by code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 by which section 50a has been inserted. it requires the police ..... protections from power must be held to flow from articles 21 and 22(1) and enforced strictly.it shall be the duty of the magistrate, before whom the arrested person ..... those of individuals collectively; of simply deciding what is wanted and where to put the weight and the emphasis; of doing which comes first - the criminals or society, the law ..... to the spot to investigate the facts and circumstances of the case and if necessary to take measures for the discovery and arrest of the offender. thus investigation primarily consists in the ascertainment ..... om parkash and ors. v. state of punjab and ors. : [1985]2scr72 ; rajpur ruda meha and ors. v. state ..... power to arrest the person or persons suspected of the commission of the offence under section 54 of the code. a police officer making an investigation is enjoined to enter his proceedings ..... registration of a complaint in the nature of a counter-case from the purview of the code is not excluded. any further complaint by the same complainant or others against the same accused, subsequent to the registration ..... act, 1960, held that interim relief should be granted if so required but in a foolproof case. the court held as under:in such a case the availability of a very strong prima facie case - of a standard ..... with the provisions of the code of criminal procedure.17. in state of maharashtra v. mohd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2006 (FN)

League of United LatIn American Citizens Vs. Perry

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-28-2006

..... obligations under 5 of the voting rights act. brief for state appellees 105 106. that provision forbids a covered jurisdiction to promulgate any standard, practice, or procedure unless it does not have ..... 24. see ante , at 37 40. the plurality accepts this conclusion by placing great weight on the fact that martin frost, the perennially successful congressional candidate in district 24, was white. ..... to engage in such excessive partisan gerrymandering would be avoided if the court were willing to enforce those standards. in any event, justice kennedy s additional requirement that there be proof that the gerrymander ..... g. , cleburne v. cleburne living center, inc., 473 u. s. 432 , 447 (1985). similarly, the freedom of political belief and association guaranteed by the first amendment prevents the state, absent a ..... 521 u. s. 74 , 91 92 (1997); gingles , supra , at 52 54, 59 60. the pertinence of minority voters role in a primary is obvious: a dominant party ..... registration time periods are an unfortunate part of this state s minority voting rights history. the history of official discrimination in the texas election process stretching back to reconstruction led to the inclusion of the state as a covered jurisdiction under section 5 in the 1975 amendments to the voting rights act ..... measure of fairness for determining whether a partisan gerrymander is unconstitutional. p. 7. 2. texas redrawing of district 23 s lines amounts to vote dilution violative of 2 of the voting rights act of 1965. pp. 17 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //