Standards Of Weights And Measures Enforcement Act 1985 54 Of 1985 Chapter 6 Manufacture Repair Or Sale Of Weights Or Measures - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., Rep. by Its Power of Attorney Holder ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2011(2)KLJ613; 2011(2)ILR(Ker)804; 2011(2)KLT1040; 2011CrLJ3791; 2011(2)KHC582

apply. 10. It is true that Section 79 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 provides that all references to note here that Section 12 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 deals with only units of weight purview of Section 2 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985? The answer would be that there could (Enforcement) Act, 1985: Preamble: "An Act to provide for the enforcement of the standards of weights and measures established by or contended that the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to motor vehicles, 2 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985? The answer would be that there could be no such Schedule except for the purpose of scientific or technological research." 6. The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is a consolidating and amending Accordingly, Exts.P1 and P3 are quashed. It is declared that manufacturers of vehicles are entitled to express the unit of power in Form No.20 is "horse power". Form No.21 is the sale certificate as provided in Rule 47 of the Central Rules

indus Videotronics and anr. Vs. Digambar M. Badodkar and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)2009

even distribution of such packaged commodities not conforming to the standards laid down under the Act and the Rules is made have been lodged under Section 33(1) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 and Rule 6(1)(c), (d) and conditions under the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act and the rules in that behalf. Reference to Section under the Act or Rules. Even Section 33 of the Act provides that the provisions of the Standards Act and the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 and the Rules made thereunder in the Metropolitan Magistrates Courts Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 and Rule 6(1)(c), (d) and (f) of the Standards of Weights and Measures any mark on any packaged commodity, not produced, made or manufactured by him or it, and the mark claims the commodity was considering in that case the provisions of Kerala General Sales-Tax Act and the meaning of the word 'produced'. The Supreme

Sharad Baburao Latkar Vs. Sharad Wasudeodas Gujar and Another

Court: Mumbai

purchased was shown as 28.16 sq. meters. He argued that Standards of Weights and Measures Act 1976 was came into force appellant did not raise any point under the Standards of Weights and measures Act, 1976 either before the trial court or of provision of Section 80 of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and also Legal Metrology Act 2009 the sale to the goods and the commodities. The Act protects the interest of the consumers in every aspect of life. It gives weight, measure or numeration shall, after the commencement of this Act, be stated in any enactment, notification, rule, order, contract, deed does not come to 78.6 sq.meters but it comes to 60.32 sq. meters. Hence, it is submitted that the appeal court square feet or square meters but at the time of sale the area is described or area is measured as half

Mukul Dalmia and ors. Vs. Kiran Pal and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001IVAD(Delhi)282; 91(2001)DLT65

the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 against he petitioners, summoning the petitioners under Section 50 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 in the complaint filed by respondent against he petitioners, Controller, Department of Standards of Weights and Measures and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. were also arrayed as respondents. Section 39(2) of the Standard of Weight and measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 as well as under Section 420, IPC. Accordingly, all 39(2) of the Standard of Weight and measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 as well as under Section 420, IPC. Accordingly, all the of offences by magistrates.--(1) Subject to the provisions of this chapter, any Magistrate of the first class, and any Magistrate of

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Subhash Arjundas Kataria

Court: Supreme Court of India

the offence is compoundable as per Section 73 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and Section 65 of or the net quantity in terms of standard units of weights, measures or number of the commodity contained in wholesale package: commodity” under Rule 2(l) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 (in short `the Rules). In the would not be pre-packed commodity for the purpose of the Act and the Rules. As rightly observed by the High Court 65 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985. d) On 18.11.2006, the respondents, vide their letter, replied to and ultimately Rule 3 specifically suggests that the provisions of Chapter II would apply to the packages intended for “retail sale” under the “retail sale”. Once that position is clear Rule 6 would specifically include the refrigerator and would carry along with declaration as to,- (a) the name and address of the manufacturer or where the manufacturer is not the packer, of the the sale of the refrigerator is covered under the “retail sale”. Once that position is clear Rule 6 would specifically include

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Weights and Measures Department and Anoth ...

Court: Delhi

under the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 and Standards of Weight and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985. Rs.1400/- on it. 6.2. It was the duty of the Weights and Measures Department to have carried out an investigation before Weight and Measures Act, 1976 and Standards of Weight and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985. and there is a decline of 51.09% in the current financial year as compared to previous financial year. 17. This Court documents, he shall procure form number 32 as per Company Act. He shall ensure that all Directors are alive and responsible 33/39 of the Standards of Weight and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 punishable under Sections 51/63 of the said Act. It was which the learned Magistrate took cognizance on 6th July, 2011. 6. The petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated 6th July, also, the department would have been justified in prosecuting the manufacturer/importer of the packages. On the other hand, if no alteration

Sony India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(94)ECC33; 2004(167)ELT385(SC); JT2004(Suppl1)SC567; 2004(5)SCALE560; (2004)5SCC751

goods are cleared in packed condition as per requirement of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. It was admitted that getting over the payment of higher duty. The Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 specifically provides that every the payment of higher duty. The Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 specifically provides that every package shall be considered is whether penalty imposed under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB was justified in the circumstances that arise by the appellant. Under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, the manner in which the whole transaction went on makes of duty ranging from Rs. 1500/- per set to Rs. 5400/- per set was leviable depending upon the size of screen goods in question had been removed from the place of manufacture without printing the retail sale price as it was mandatory their depots and before putting the goods in question for sale in the market they had been printing retail sale price

itc Ltd. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(102)DRJ637; 2009(243)ELT24(Del)

be in contravention of the 1976 Act read with the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 ('1977 Rules') Magistrate ('SMM'), Shahdara, Delhi under Section 33 of the Standards Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 ('1985 Act').2. The facts in Shahdara, Delhi under Section 33 of the Standards Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 ('1985 Act').2. The facts in brief are also be outside the scope of Section 4A of the Act as the Rules do not apply to the said packages.10. Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ('1976 Act') and not the 1985 Act. He submits that the package which was found to to retail package is indicated in a separate Chapter i.e. Chapter II and that applicable to the wholesale packages is set specified in Rule 29 in relation to wholesale packages. Rule 6 requires retail packages to mention inter alia, the net quantity, wholesale packages to mention the name and address of the manufacturer, the identity of the commodity contained in the package, the Rule 29 would be outside the purview of the retail sales as under that Rule retail prices are not required to

Karnataka Weights and Measures Licence Holders Association Vs. Control ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1993KAR2894; 1994(1)KarLJ224

enforcement of Sub-rule (2) of Rule 17 of the Karnataka Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Rules 1988. The entire Rule Sub-rule (2) of Rule 17 of the Karnataka Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Rules 1988. The entire Rule 17 is :-(1) Fees payable for verification and stamping of weights or measures at the office or camp office the Inspector shall be of repairers of weights/measures. The Association is aggrieved by the enforcement of Sub-rule (2) of Rule 17 of the Karnataka Standards in the very Rule. The amount collected cannot exceed the actual expenses that would be incurred by the Inspector for visiting J.1. The petitioner is an Association of licence holders of repairers of weights/measures. The Association is aggrieved by the enforcement of

Titan Industries Limited and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

the Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1985 would not apply to of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1985 applicable to the petitioner. 2. It and Measures Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1985 would not apply to the petitioner, it's outlets, Measures Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1985 would not apply to the petitioner, it's outlets, showrooms Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1985 would not apply to the petitioner, it's outlets, showrooms and by from Mr.Joshi is marked as Exhibit "X" for identification. 6. Mr.Joshi, therefore, submits that this petition will have to be the petitioner, it's outlets, showrooms and place of display or sale or storage. 5. The copy of the judgment dated 10.07.2006