Stand - Judgment Search Results

Pallavan Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority Under the ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)IILLJ262Mad

..... no reason as to why a different age should be prescribed under the standing orders that standing orders framed for pandyan roadways corporation which is not different from the petitioner ..... writ petition the petitioner among other grounds disputes about the provisions made in the standing orders in respect of superannuation compulsory retirement casual leave confirmation of probation recruitment of .....

K.N. Vellayan Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)IILLJ186Mad

..... had been continuously absent for more than 8 days and therefore the standing order stands attracted the existence of the relevant standing order and its application to the appellants case cannot be said ..... of an industrial employee remaining absent for more than 8 days consecutively under the relevant standing orders of the establishment cannot be a subject matter of reference by the government under .....

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... but that is not so under the law as it stands to day 313 this view taken by me in regard to the ..... firmly and sincerely believe in the righteousness of their respective stands with overtones of sentiment and emotion both the camps can claim among ..... reformulating them or at times abandoning them altogether when they stand condemned as mischievous in the social consciousness of the hour the social .....

Amitava Bhattacharya and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

..... appearing in the selection test for the purpose of this permanent appointment therefore they stand on the same footing as the petitioner and accordingly the petitioners are entitled to ..... additional contribution to the subscribed capital of the corporation and such additional subscribed capital shall stand transferred to and vested in the central government 2 the corporation shall distribute the .....

Titagarh Jute Factory Co. Limited Vs. Sriram Tiwari

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1979)ILLJ495Cal

..... would not be attaining the stipulated age of superannuation as per standing orders when the factory refused to accept the aforesaid contention of ..... the relevant clause namely clause c of paragraph 13 of the standing orders of the petitioner company is as follows c age of ..... male workers shall be 58 years this provision contained in the standing orders is one of the statutory terms and conditions of .....

Gladstone, Realtors Vs. Village of Bellwood

Court: US Supreme Court

..... community because of petitioners conduct we find this difference unimportant to our analysis of standing in both situations the deprivation of the benefits of interracial associations constitutes the ..... on federal jurisdiction may nonetheless be barred from federal court under our prudential standing rules because he asserts a generalized grievance shared in substantially equal measure by .....

State of U.P. Vs. Mumtaz Hussain

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1979All174

..... operative farm rudrapur issued an auction notice informing all intending buyers that 171 shisham trees standing near villages sardarnagir sakhania ahmadnagar baur bridge up to bhora vajer ex 15 were to ..... accept this submission the auction notice dated 12 5 1952 did not mention that trees standing in villages sardarnagar sakania ahmadnagar and baur bridge to behra wazir were being sold instead .....

Orr Vs. Orr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... parties central to this art iii limitation on federal judicial power is the concept of standing the standing inquiry focuses on the party before the court asking whether he has such a personal ..... any plaintiff s success can theoretically be thwarted mr orr must be held to have standing here we have on several occasions considered this inherent problem of challenges to underinclusive statutes .....

Parker Vs. Randolph

Court: US Supreme Court

..... inculpated a nonconfessing defendant in a joint trial at which neither defendant took the stand here in contrast the interlocking inculpatory confessions of respondents randolph pickens and hamilton ..... against its source one of harrington s codefendants whose confession implicated harrington took the stand and was subject to cross examination the other two codefendants whose statements corroborated .....

New Jersey Vs. Portash

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cannot properly invoke the privilege against compulsory incrimination because he did not take the witness stand and as a result his immunized grand jury testimony was never used against him ..... context moreover requiring that the claim be presented only by those who have taken the stand will prevent defendants with no real intention of testifying from creating artificial constitutional challenges to .....