Skip to content


Squatter - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: squatter Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 1,602 results (0.026 seconds)
Mar 22 2002 (HC)

Charanjeet Dudeja Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2002

Reported in: 100(2002)DLT30

..... the area meant for non parking zones furthermore even the squatters were not asked as to how and why they were ..... and the same acts were repeated that the officials contacted some squatters went away quietly without any objections having been raised with ..... selected on randum basis shall identify fresh squatting zones so that squatters are properly rehabilitated and not simply uprooted to deprive them .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2002 (HC)

Madan Lal JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2002

Reported in: 103(2003)DLT416

..... recorded to the effect that the gadgil assurances did not cover the cases of commercial squatters by interpreting the scheme in the light of various documents including office memorandum dated 31 ..... development authority air1988delhi76 in support of the submission that gadgil assurances covered cases of commercial squatters also an attempt on the part of the petitioner to seek review on the basis .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 2002 (HC)

Sh. Jagbhushan Lal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-12-2002

Reported in: 2003(66)DRJ378

..... telephone bill if any dating back to 1950 8 any other letter addressed to the squatter at his place of occupation prior to 1950 5 it is not disputed that the ..... d voter s list of june 1951 and 3 any other letter addressed to the squatter at his place of occupation prior to 15th august 1950 7 i am thus of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2002 (HC)

Bennett Coleman and Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Narayan Atmaram Sawant a ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: May-02-2002

Reported in: 2002(5)BomCR33; [2002(95)FLR544]; 2002(3)MhLj732

..... to the company and to the union who wants the benefits of the settlement the squatter was that those who did not sign the prescribed declaration were denied the benefits of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2002 (HC)

Manish Vij and ors. Vs. Indra Chugh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-29-2002

Reported in: AIR2002Delhi243; 97(2002)DLT1

..... to the lawful owner of the name at premium is called cyber squatting the cyber squatters quickly sell the domain names to other non related entities thereby enabling passing off and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2002 (HC)

Brig. V.K. Anand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-08-2002

Reported in: 2010[17]STR451

..... 2002 this rejection of statutory complaint vide order dated 9 7 2002 and as a squatter thereto reconvening of general court martial vide order dated 20 7 2002 has prompted the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 2002 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Parshadi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-26-2002

Reported in: 2003(69)DRJ751

..... go into the question as to whether it was validly taken or not as a squatter when the taking over of physical possession of the land was not questioned in any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2002 (SC)

Mst. Bilkis Begum @ Jahanara Vs. Majid Ali Gazi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-13-2002

Reported in: JT2002(Suppl1)SC115

order1 leave granted 2 the appellant mst bilkis begum jahanara was the wife of respondent no 1 majid all gazi...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 2002 (SC)

L.M.L. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-20-2002

Reported in: 2002(82)ECC225; 2002LC280(SC); 2002(142)ELT273(SC); JT2002(Suppl1)SC127; (2002)9SCC423

order1 there is no merit in these appeals we set out briefly as illustrative the facts of the appeals filed...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2002 (SC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Asha Rani and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-03-2002

Reported in: 2003ACJ1; AIR2003SC607; 2003(1)ALT35(SC); 2003(1)AWC719(SC); 2003(1)BLJR448; [2003]113CompCas520(SC); 101(2002)DLT181(SC); 2003(66)DRJ161; (2003)2GLR105; (2003)2GLR81; [200

patnaik c j 1 leave granted in slp sic nos 12040 12369 and 13159of 2002 2 the question that arises...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //