Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sports broadcasting signals mandatory sharing with prasar bharati act 2007 section 1 short title extent and commencement Page 1 of about 20 results (0.231 seconds)

Feb 04 2015 (HC)

Ravi Dev Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... for declaring that no person other than prasar bharati had the right to transmit, relay or offer for exhibition, the live broadcasting signals of sports events shown by prasar bharati under the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the sports act ). a declaration was also sought that no cable television network, direct-tohome (dth) network, multi-system network or local ..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007 (ord. 4 of 2007), shall be deemed to have been issued validly under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2015 (HC)

Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati, ...

Court : Delhi

..... for declaring that no person other than prasar bharati had the right to transmit, relay or offer for exhibition, the live broadcasting signals of sports events shown by prasar bharati under the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the sports act ). a declaration was also sought that no cable television network, direct-tohome (dth) network, multi-system network or local ..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007 (ord. 4 of 2007), shall be deemed to have been issued validly under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2015 (HC)

Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati ...

Court : Delhi

..... for declaring that no person other than prasar bharati had the right to transmit, relay or offer for exhibition, the live broadcasting signals of sports events shown by prasar bharati under the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the sports act ). a declaration was also sought that no cable television network, direct-tohome (dth) network, multi-system network or local ..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007 (ord. 4 of 2007), shall be deemed to have been issued validly under .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2016 (SC)

Star Sports India Pvt Ltd. Vs. Prasar Bharti and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007( order 4 of 2007), shall be deemed to have been issued validly under ..... raises the issue regarding the scope of obligations of a television broadcasting organisation under the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as sports act ). we may mention at the outset that under section 3 of the sports act, a television broadcasting organisation is prohibited from carrying the live television broadcast of a sporting event of national importance on cable or direct-to- home .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Home Cable Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Prasar Bharati Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Sopan Foundation Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Union of India Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Secretary Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2018 (SC)

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... channels shall comply with the programme and advertising code prescribed under the cable television networks (regulation) act, 1995. to 5.2. the company shall ensure compliance of the provisions of sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act 11 of 2007 and the rules, guidelines, notifications issued thereunder. code/standards 5.3. the applicant company shall adhere to any other guidelines/restrictions prescribed ..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007 (ord. 4 of 2007) shall be deemed to have been issued validly under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2017 (HC)

Prasar Bharati vs.nimbus Communication Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... 10.2010. the telecast was shared live with the plaintiff. the bookings for the advertisement were carried out by the defendant. in terms of section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act 2007, the plaintiff had 25% share in the advertisements issued by the defendant. the minimum bid amount being 10.35 crores it ..... offer of rs.3 crore. the offer of defendant being highest it was awarded the right to market the series in terms of rule 4(2) of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) rules, 2007. it is also pleaded that in view of the above acceptance of the bidding of the defendant it was under an ..... interest thereon @ 18% per annum from 15.1.2011 to 13.1.2014.2. in exercise of the power conferred by section 7 of the act, the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) rules 2007 were promulgated. sub-rule 2 of rule 4 whereof required a sealed bid procedure to be adopted inter-se the rights owner .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //