Split Off - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Fedders Lloyd Corporation Vs. Cce, Mumbai Ii

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT1331TriDel

appellants he finally mentioned that the activity of manufacturing of split air conditioner was not disclosed to the department by the

Easley Vs. Cromartie

Court: US Supreme Court

also criticizes dr weber s testimony that precinct 77 s split was racially motivated and his proposed alternative that all of

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

2 policy ii sb dt 31st october 1975 which prohibited splitting of the purchase order to avoid the necessity of obtaining

Rajiv Das Vs. United Press Limited and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2002)111CompCas584

second respondent against the petitioner while making a request for splitting of the joint shares the petitioner had neither taken the

M/S. Moorthy'S International and Vs. Cc. Chennai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

telephone instruments was made from the said shippers by arranging split consignments in two lots consisting of components of telephones in

indo Overseas Films Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)LC268Tri(Chennai)

royalty charges as well as distribution charges in such circumstances split up of value cannot be furnished and it has to

Janata Party Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

was also lack of knowledge thereof consequent to the successive splits undergone by the party from time to time it was

Janata Party Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Del)116

each such state manned by several representatives and after the splits it may be anybody s guess as to the number

Subhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)82ITD345(Delhi)

as hcl ltd it was further explained that after the split the share capital of hcl ltd was divided into shares

K.K. Modi Vs. Securities Appellate Tribunal

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(2)BomCR523; [2003]113CompCas418(Bom)

..... with assets and liabilities the three companies which were to be split up were to have an independent chairman the common activities of ..... bitter contest between them inasmuch as modipon ltd wishes to sell off its shares while the acquirers contend that modipon ltd cannot ..... acquiring further shares but on the contrary is interested in selling off its shareholding in mrl with a view to meet its .....