Skip to content


Split Duty - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: split duty Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 555 results (0.276 seconds)
Sep 14 1992 (TRI)

R.K. Swamy Advertising Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on: Sep-14-1992

Reported in: (1993)44ITD99(Mad.)

..... of the consideration for the sale was artificially split up and shown separately as excise duty so that it can escape the levy of ..... organisation of that firm s business into different geographical units by splitting into 5 firms he found that the assessee was the only ..... steadfastness with which the other cit appeals had struck to his duty to be fair disregarding the reward scheme we are compelled to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1992 (HC)

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Mar-30-1992

Reported in: 74(1992)CLT553; 1992(39)ECC72; 1995(75)ELT501(Ori)

..... and m d 302 by splitting the value which was deliberately done to restrict the levy of customs duty on the f o b ..... issuing the summons considers necessary 8 the customs authorities have their duty to check evasion to discover illegal imports and to award deterrent ..... the valuation of imported goods to decide the leviability of customs duty the submission of mr lahiri on this score is accordingly rejected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 1992 (HC)

Gandhinagar Bottling Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-31-1992

Reported in: 1995(75)ELT54(Guj); (1992)2GLR1339

..... get benefit the concessional rate was not intended to benefit the large units which had split up into smaller units to earn the concession the tendency towards fragmentation of the bigger ..... name owned by another company exemption notification issued providing that exemption on concessional rate of duty not applicable to specified goods exemption not available on which brand name of another person .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1992 (HC)

P.J. Appalanarasayya and Sons Vs. General Manager, S.E. Railway and or ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jan-31-1992

Reported in: AIR1993Ori40

..... a liberal construction and no podantic approach should be adopted to defeat justice on hair splitting technicalities and even if the pleadings may not expressly make out a case in accordance ..... with strict interpretation of law the duty of the court is to ascertain the substance of the pleadings to determine the question .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1992 (HC)

Birendra Kumar Rai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-21-1992

Reported in: 1992CriLJ3866

28 of the 1985 act they were produced before the duty magistrate on 14th august 1990 who remanded them to judicial

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 1992 (HC)

Dharmaraja Vellalar Vs. Ramachandra Vellalar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-09-1992

Reported in: (1993)1MLJ426

defendant himself is not liable to pay the entire stamp duty the plaintiff himself had supplied the entire stamp papers only

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 1992 (HC)

Mohd. Lqbal Qureshi Vs. Manager, Delhi Slaughter House

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-1992

Reported in: 48(1992)DLT612; 1992(24)DRJ602; ILR1993Delhi201; 1992RLR535

today to be posted at the slaughter house and their duties 611 will be prescribed in order to ensure that cattle

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 1992 (HC)

Jute Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Nellimaria Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-14-1992

Reported in: (1993)1CALLT79(HC)

raw jute to the jute mills necessarily flow from its duty to ensure distribution of raw jute or its duty to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 17 1992 (HC)

Hem Raj and anr. Vs. Jagdish Rai

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-17-1992

Reported in: (1992)102PLR583

punjab 407 and pritam singh v assistant controller of estate duty patiala 1976 punj lr 342 whether there is any conflict

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 1992 (HC)

Uttamdoss Vs. the Government of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-29-1992

Reported in: 1992(2)ALT282

..... is that the arrangement contemplated by section 52 is not by splitting the office of mathadhipathi into a custodian for secular purposes ..... 1scr1005 in support of his contention that conferring only spiritual duties on the mahant would destroy his rights as superior of ..... of mahantship both the elements of office and property of duties and personal interest are blended together and neither can be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //