Split Duty - Judgment Search Results

Nirmal R Ruparel and Others Vs. Cce Vapi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

issued directing sgspl as to why the demand of differential duty be not raised on them as the value which is

Kalpataru Power Transmission Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

only paid by m s pgcil as part of customs duty on imported raw material 3 the remaining amount of rs

Avaya Global Connect Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)(213)ELT383TriAhmd

have not manufactured software and therefore is not liable to duty on account of software software as such is liable to

M/S. Marigold Paints Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. Cce. Vadodara I

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

1997 we find that there was no intent to evade duty as the goods were covered by regular challans of sab

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)(209)ELT429TriAhmd

correct classification would be under heading 7308 90 15 while duty had been paid 13 as applicable to goods under chapter

M/S. Intellicon Pvt Ltd and Others Vs. Cce and St, Ahmedabad Iii and A ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

the epabx systems for the purpose of charging central excise duty 4 shri paritosh gupta learned advocate appearing on behalf of

M/S. Sanghi Industries Ltd Vs. Cce, Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

grinding unit and cleared the final goods on payment of duty from the grinding unit the said rule 4 5 a

M/S. Ravi Kiran Plastics Pvt. Limited and Others Vs. Commissioner of C ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

manufactured paints and sold the same to sipl they paid duty on the transaction value the value shown in the invoice

Jyoti Limited Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2008)9STR373

and procedures for an existing plant g commissioner confirmed the duty amounting to rs 1 84 75 749 and imposed penalty

Jyoti Limited, Shri Suresh Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2008)12STT317

rs 1 84 75 749 which is equal to the duty evaded the penalties imposed under other sections on the appellant