Specific - Judgment Search Results

Southern Pine Lumber Co. Vs. Ward

Court: US Supreme Court

action the sum of 5 100 and that said note specifies that said indebtedness shall bear interest etc again the court

Dibakar Bisi Vs. Chatto Bag

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.672

year after the settlement comes into effect this sub section specifies the period within which a suit under section 83 is

Santishwar Mahanta and ors. Vs. Lakhikanta Mahanta

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.321

in the previous part of his judgment the district judge specifies with sufficient clearness the witnesses on whose evidence he relies

Meherbai Vs. Hormasji N. Motivala

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR1019

corresponding sections of the english act are exhaustive the latter specifies all the legal grounds on which a petitioner suing for

In Re: Abdul Kadir Saheb

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.1107a

..... debt namely excise department in instant case in the absence of specific provision of first charge in central excise act as well as ..... debts get priority over ordinary debts only when there is a specific provision in the statute claiming first charge over the property the ..... debt namely excise department in instant case in the absence of specific provision of first charge in central excise act as well as .....

Panchkouri Ghosh Vs. Pran Gopal Mukerjee and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.70

..... by to set aside revenue sale fraud of co sharer purchase by him in benami specific relief act i of 1877 section 42 suit for declaration consequential relief

In Re: Jogendra Nath Mukhuti and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal271

..... municipal act bengal act iii of 1899 section 556 tenders invitation of when not obligatory specific relief act i of 1877 section 45 mandamus

Sankara Reddi Vs. Errama Reddi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.618a

..... cause courts act ix of 1887 schedule ii article 31 suit for account suit for specific items of money alleged to be due from an agent is not a suit for .....

Shamu Patter Vs. Abdul Kadir Ravuthan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ219

..... in contract which repeatedly showed that time was to be of essence of contract were specifically mentioned clear condition in contract that purchasers would have to definitely deposit balance amount by .....

Murugappa Asari Vs. Santhiammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1908)18MLJ198

..... in contract which repeatedly showed that time was to be of essence of contract were specifically mentioned clear condition in contract that purchasers would have to definitely deposit balance amount by .....