Spec - Judgment Search Results

Rajendranagar Municipality Rep. by Its Commissioner Vs. B.V. Perraju a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(2)ALT320

..... the expression entitled in section 33 c 2 is understood can there be even a spec of doubt that such being a vested right could it not be an existing right .....

Chiloda Gram Panchayat Vs. Administrator, Gandhinagar District Panchay ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1996)3GLR360

..... v shri hari ram nathwani and ors cannot assist the petitioner in view of the spec 1976 illj1sc ific statutory provision contained in section 271 2 i of the said act .....

United States Vs. Lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... could regulate matters that substantially affect interstate commerce there would have been no need to spec interstate foreign commerce and purely intrastate commerce was hard to draw the court attempted to .....

J.S. Punia Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1995Delhi768

..... shali on the other hand has contended that the petitioners was being treated by the spec alists he was not being treated by a layman in order to get scared of .....

V.M. Mathew Vs. V.S. Sharma and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC109; JT1995(6)SC318; 1996(1)KLT36(SC); (1996)1MLJ76(SC); 1995(5)SCALE111; (1995)6SCC122; [1995]Supp3SCR131; 1995(2)LC809(SC)

ramaswamy j 1 special leave granted 2 this appeal by special leave is filed against the order dated november 16 1994

Laxmi Chand and Others Vs. Gram Panchayat, Kararia and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC523; JT1995(8)SC195; 1995(6)SCALE351; (1996)7SCC218; [1995]Supp4SCR774

decision dated january 1 1994 dismissed the same thus this special leave petition 2 the contention raised by the learned counsel

J. Alexander, I.A.S., Major Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1996CriLJ592; ILR1995KAR2578; 1995(4)KarLJ227

petition is directed against an order made by the learned special judge functioning under the prevention of corruption act 1988 on

Hanumappa Sawkar Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1995KAR1014; 1995(2)KarLJ6

or a charge not amounting to mortgage of the kind specified in section 100 of the transfer of property act 1882

Giani Devender Singh Sant Sepoy Sikh Vs. Union of India and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1847; 1995(1)Crimes298(SC); JT1995(1)SC263; 1995(1)SCALE25; (1995)1SCC391; [1995]1SCR27; 1995(1)LC425(SC)

be dismissed 5 it has been alleged in the instant special leave petitions that the petitioner made a complaint on january

Collector of Central Excise, Baroda Vs. Ojas Corporation

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(82)ELT447(SC); 1995Supp(3)SCC399

same manner section 31 of the act provides for a special provision it apart from the default on the part of