Spec - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: spec Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 314 results (0.19 seconds)Sri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court: Karnataka
law will not be deemed discriminatory even if due to specific circumstances some individuals within the class receive an advantage over
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court: Karnataka
the consumers in accordance with the guidelines as may be specified by the state commission 6 any consumer who is aggrieved
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court: Karnataka
the suit and also filed an application to stop the special general body meeting to be held on 29 11 2024
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
as provided in annexure 1 in accordance with the gender specified in the said certificate of identity 4 the district magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court: Karnataka
having considered the averments made in the plaint it is specifically pleaded while seeking the relief of permanent injunction regarding modified
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...
Court: Karnataka
court the plea of an alternate efficacious remedy is a specious plea raised in the present matter by sridevi and dr
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court: Karnataka
away with it this court as aforesaid cannot be mute spectator to such gross abuse resorted to by sridevi and dr
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court: Karnataka
away with it this court as aforesaid cannot be mute spectator to such gross abuse resorted to by sridevi and dr
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri Vs. Syed Yaseen Pasha Khadri Since D ...
Court: Karnataka
and spiritual congregations though the term sajjadanashin has not been specifically defined either under the act 1954 or under the act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Syed Aslam Pasha Khadri Vs. Sri Syed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri
Court: Karnataka
consequential reliefs in view of provisions of section 34 of specific relief act the trial court and the first appellate court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial