Singularize - Judgment Search Results

Mohanlal Jatia Vs. the Competent Authority Under the Smugglers and For ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1992)94BOMLR216; 1993CriLJ1477

mrs manohar j 1 the petitioner has challenged in this writ petition notices dated 24 3 1987 and 27 10...

Baij Nath Agarwalla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 99(2002)DLT684; 2002(84)ECC219

s b sinha c j 1 the short question which arises for consideration in this writ petition is as to...

Mr. Winston Tan S/O Winston Tan and Mr. Gibran Tan S/O Winston Tan Vs. ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2008KAR411; 2008(3)KarLJ58

orderajit j gunjal j 1 the short question which is required to be decided in these proceedings is whether the...

Sh. Gulshan Ahuja and ors., Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2005CriLJ1667; 115(2004)DLT691; 2005(79)DRJ260; 2005(99)ECC46

sanjay kishan kaul j 1 the action taken by the competent authority under the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators forfeiture...

Smt. Surjit Kaur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(59)ECC71

satyabrata sinha j 1 the petitioner by reason of this application questions an order dated 25th november 1996 passed by...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mohanlal Likumal Punjabi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC1704; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)739; 2004(92)ECC129; 2004(166)ELT296(SC); JT2004(2)SC528; 2004(2)SCALE527; (2004)3SCC628; 2004(2)LC870(SC)

arijit pasayat j 1 since the points involved in the criminal appeals are identical they are taken up together for...

Smt. Kamla Bai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 109(2004)DLT237; 2004(72)DRJ613; 2004(92)ECC376

badar durrez ahmed j 1 the quashing of the order dated 22 7 2002 passed by the competent authority new...

Development Credit Bank Ltd. Vs. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Prop ...

Court: Mumbai

b p colabawalla j 1 rule respondents waive service by consent of the parties rule made returnable forthwith and heard...

Anderson Vs. Dickie

Court: House of Lords

..... had not been sufficiently cleared namely whether certain conditions as to building were binding on singular successors without being either declared in terms to be real burdens or being fenced with ..... argued whether the restriction imposed is in sufficiently definite terms to be enforced against a singular successor having come to the conclusion that the respondent is not acting in contravention of .....

Kemp Vs. Magistrates of Largs

Court: House of Lords

..... which must be fulfilled in order to constitute a real burden or restriction binding on singular successors were anxiously discussed and carefully formulated in the leading case of tailors of aberdeen ..... the restriction however clearly it may itself be expressed was intended to be binding on singular successors unless the granter has signified that intention clearly the law does not hold purchasers .....