Simultaneity - Judgment Search Results

State Vs. Bhim Singh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1978CriLJ1041

..... the principle of severability and proceed to decide issues of law first without taking up simultaneously other issues for decision this course of action is not available to a court because .....

Bhagwan Bux Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC34; 1978CriLJ153; (1978)1SCC214

..... the scheme of s 251a of the code which was brought on the statute book simultaneously with s 207 a by act 26 of 1955 also furnishes an indication that in .....

Central Bank of India Vs. Current Transport Finance (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1977CriLJ266; 13(1977)DLT164; 1978RLR34

..... 2 and the directors hereof on money advanced on the hypothecation of certain buses and simultaneously applied for attaching the vehicles before judgment the court directed notice of the application to .....

Ranchhoddas Chhaganlal Vs. Devaji Supdu Dorik and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1977)3SCC584; [1977]2SCR621

..... 63 36 in the tariff act and item 26aa in the excise act were enacted simultaneously came into force on the same day from one code and are pari materia they .....

Shantaben Narottamdas (A.P. of Late Narottamdas K. Shah) Vs. Controlle ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1978]111ITR365(Guj)

..... in determining the value of the estate passing on the death simultaneously with the death of a person such is the submission two ..... of the estate and exigibility to tax all the three take place simultaneously at an identical notional point of time there is no warrant ..... the death of necessity and therefore death and passing cannot be simultaneous we are fortified in the view that we are taking by .....

Brown Vs. Ohio

Court: US Supreme Court

..... surely would be so with respect to the theft and any simultaneous unlawful operation furthermore as a matter of statutory construction the allowable ..... was merely a preliminary statement indicating that the theft and any simultaneous unlawful operation were one and the same but the ohio ..... court of appeals then went on flatly to hold that such simultaneity was not present here thus it seems to me the .....

Megha Singh and Co. and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1977P& H297; [1977]40STC370(P& H)

..... 6 it was also not disputed before us that the legislature was competent to levy simultaneously two taxes of the same kind for different purposes in mathra parshad v state of ..... provide for the levy of tax on the sale of manufactured tobacco being simultaneously in force or in the simultaneous levy of both the taxes they observed there can be two taxes .....

Tumati Rangayya Etc. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1978AP106

..... laws dealing with the same subject matter may co exist and may be susceptible of simultaneous obedience but as pointed out by evatt j in stock motor plough limited v forsyth ..... impose a ceiling on the holding of land apply as we have already pointed out simultaneously to the same land in an urban agglomeration which is capable of being used but .....

Gulabrai Kalidas Naik and ors. Vs. Laxmidas Lallubhai Patel of Baroda ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1978]48CompCas438(Guj); (1977)GLR42; (1978)0GLR192; (1977)47CompCas151

..... transfer forms alleged to have been handed over the petitioners to respondent no 4 and simultaneously fabricating the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors alleged to have been ..... with the petition within the four corners of section 155 of the companies act that simultaneously raises the more important and incidental question whether the court should forbid itself jurisdiction under .....

Smt. Yuvrani Tank Rajeshwari Devi Vs. Harilal and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1978MP201; 1978MPLJ433

..... proceedings but he did not withdraw if there was an agreement that both will withdraw simultaneously there is no explanation as to why respondent no 3 alone made an application to ..... from the proceedings and did not insist on respondent no 1 to make an application simultaneously for withdrawal from the proceedings surendranath bahadursingh admitted that the assurance was based on respondents .....