Silicate - Year 2002 - Judgments

Jul 26 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Goodluck Silicate Industries (P) Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-26-2002

Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN715(Guj)

k a puj j in this reference at the instance of the applicant revenue the following question of law is...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2002 (HC)

Shivam Lime Works and Shivam Sodium Silicate Industries Vs. Central Co ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-30-2002

Reported in: [2003(1)JCR484(Jhr)]

orders j mukhopadhaya j 1 in both the cases petitioners have challenged the common wireless message dated 30th july 2002...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2002 (TRI)

Shriram Chits (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Jan-31-2002

Reported in: (2002)83ITD792(Hyd.)

..... in the punjab amp haryana high court s judgment in soda silicate amp chemical works ltd s case supra in these circumstances he ..... tax act invoking the principle of mutuality as enunciated in soda silicate case are also very significant developments subsequent to the decision of ..... the punjab amp haryana high court in the case of soda silicate amp chemicals works supra and submitted that in that case the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2002 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. K.S. Shetty and Co.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on: Oct-25-2002

Reported in: (2003)87ITD259(Chennai)

..... high court of punjab and haryana rendered in the case of soda silicate and chemical works v cit 1989 179 itr 588 hence the assessee ..... by the high court of punjab and haryana in the case of soda silicate and chemical works 1989 179 itr 588 which was relied on by ..... the high court of punjab and haryana rendered in the case of soda silicate and chemical works 1989 179 itr 588 and refused to withdraw the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2002 (TRI)

Cethar Vessels Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-29-2002

Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC142

..... not distinguishable he submits that the tribunal in the case of silical metallurgic ltd v cce cochin went into the question of erection ..... industries ltd it is to be noted that the judgment of silical metallurgic ltd has since been confirmed by the apex court we ..... triveni engineering amp industries ltd supra virdi brothers v cce and silical metallurgic ltd supra is required to be applied to the facts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 2002 (HC)

Chem Teak Company Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-05-2002

Reported in: [2003]131STC427(Ker)

..... logs into timber sizes c crushing rubble into small metal pieces d converting sodium silicate into liquid silicate e tyre retreading f cutting granite or marble slabs into smaller pieces and or ..... case with regard to 3 crushing rubble into small metal pieces 4 converting sodium silicate into liquid silicate and 5 tyre retreading or cutting granite or marble slabs into smaller pieces and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2002 (TRI)

White Silco Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-21-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT674Tri(Mum.)bai

..... notification 5 98 will not be available to the precipitated silica silicon dioxide and aluminium silicate manufactured by the appellant the entry exempts silicon in all forms falling under chapter 28 ..... of silicon dioxide and 2839 90 in the case of aluminium silicate it is however difficult to conclude that aluminium silicate and silicon dioxide is silicon in any form means by which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2002 (TRI)

Cethar Vessels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-28-2002

Reported in: (2002)(143)ELT336Tri(Chennai)

..... is not distinguishable he submits that the tribunal in the case of silical metallurgic ltd v cce cochin 1999 106 e l t 439 went ..... one and non excisable this test was applied in the case of silical metallurgical ltd 1999 106 e l t 439 t with regard to ..... engineering amp industries ltd it is to be noted that the judgment of silical metallurgical ltd has since been confirmed by the apex court we also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2002 (HC)

Om Parkash and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-22-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3817

..... perchannel including million on dry weight basisretail levelprovided that table iodised salt may contain aluminium silicate as an anticaking agent to a maximum extent of 2 0 per cent by weight ..... at distribution channel including retail level besides that table iodised sale may also contain aluminium silicate as an anticaking agent to a maximum extent of 2 0 per cent by weight .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Siri Sri Plastics (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-05-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC710

..... cleared under exemption as held out by hon ble cegat in the case of cochin silicate and glass industries v cce cochin e since the assessee admitted duty liability during the ..... products under modvat rules the case law relied upon by the revenue i e cochin silicate and glass industries has not considered this aspect therefore the case is not applicable in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Silicate - Judgment Search Results