Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... to interfere with the activities of the petitioner foundation in any manner in the light of the status acquired by it under section 3 of the university grants commission act, 1956 (for brevity, the act of 1956'). in w.p.no.21835 of 2009, an interim order was passed by this court on 13.10.2009 suspending the operation of ..... the word universityin certain cases and states to the effect that no institution, whether a corporate body or not, other than a university established or incorporated by or under a central act, a provincial act or a state act would be entitled to have the word universityassociated with its name in any manner whatsoever. this provision therefore makes it clear that ..... so as to avoid conflict between the two as far as possible. it is no doubt true that insofar as the issue of admissions into deemed universities, falling within the ambit of the act of 1956, is concerned, the law laid down by the supreme court in bharati vidyapeeth v/s. state of maharashtra (2004) 11 scc 755) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... act, the operation of the university act would be deemed to have become unenforceable in case of technical colleges. it also observed that provision of the universities act regarding affiliation of technical colleges and conditions for grant of continuation ..... not be in a position to commence the relevant academic courses. there is a possibility of some conflict between a university act or ordinance relating to affiliation with the provisions of the central act. in such cases, the matter is squarely answered in sant dnyaneshwar shikshan shastra mahavidyalaya [2006 [9] scc 1] where the court stated that after coming into operation of the central .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... facts; ix. that the donations received by the society have no connection either direct or indirect with the admission of students to kle university; x. that under section 9 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fees) act, 1984, to inspect, enquire and investigate as to whether the institution has collected capitation fee in contravention of the provisions of the said ..... of the society and there is no illegality or infirmity in the 18 impugned order. he relies upon the following reported and un-reported decisions: i. ii. iii. iv. v. (2006) 285 itr327(karn) (sanjeevamma hanumanthe gowda charitable trust vs. director of income-tax (exemptions); (1997) 224 itr310(sc)(aditanar educational institution etc. vs. additional commissioner of income tax); (2001) 247 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of list iii after the 42nd amendment. if there was any law existing immediately before the commencement of the constitution within the meaning of article 372, such as the madras university act, 1923, the central legislation would, to the extent of repugnancy, impliedly repeal such pre-existing law. this court summed up the legal position and the test applicable in the following ..... union list vis-a-vis entry 25 of the concurrent list in relation to the provisions of tamil nadu private colleges (regulation) act and madras university act vis-a-vis council for technical education act, 1987. this court held that the central act was intended to achieve the object of coordinated and integrated development of the technical education system at all levels throughout the country .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... the recurring question of implied causes of action. cases subsequent to cort have explained that the ultimate issue is whether congress intended to create a private right of action, see universities research assn., inc. v. coutu, 450 u. s. 754 , 450 u. s. 771 -772 (1981); transamerica mortgage advisors, inc. v. lewis, supra, at 444 ..... private rights or remedies in designing this legislation. [ footnote 7 ] respondents suggest that the legislative history of the act must be read in light of the historical context during which the measure was being considered. see cannon v. university of chicago, 441 u. s. 677 , 441 u. s. 698 -699 (1979). that context, they argue ..... co. v. redington, supra, at 442 u. s. 569 -570; cannon v. university of chicago, supra, at 441 u. s. 689 -694. without analyzing either the language or legislative history of the act, the court of appeals here concluded that the act was designed for the especial benefit of private parties who may suffer "special injury" caused by .....
Tag this Judgment!