Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sikkim university act 2006 section 18 the librarian Page 1 of about 7,722 results (0.231 seconds)

Dr (Ms) B K Naik Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... court in the case of state of tamil nadu vs state of kerala reported in air2014sc2407while examining the constitutionality of kerala irrigation and water conservation (amendment) act, 2006 and declaring it as unconstitutional in its application to and effect on the mullaperiar dam was also examining the separation of powers between legislature, executive and ..... the government and whereas, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 145 of the karnataka education act, 1983 the karnataka pre-university education (academic, registration, administration and grant-in-aid etc.) rules, 2006. the sub-rule (2) and (3) of rule 21 of the said rules reads as below- framed (2 ..... karnataka in w.p. no.25447/2010 against the directions given in rule 21(2) and (3) of the karnataka pre-university education (academic, registration, administration & grant-in- aid etc.) rules, 2006. and whereas, the special leave petition no.22176-22186/10 filed by the state in the hon ble supreme court of india .....

Dr. B.K. Naik and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Ministry of Lay and P ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of state of tamil nadu vs state of kerala reported in air 2014 sc 2407 while examining the constitutionality of kerala irrigation and water conservation (amendment) act, 2006 and declaring it as unconstitutional in its application to and effect on the mullaperiar dam was also examining the separation of powers between legislature, executive and ..... period. and whereas, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 145 of the karnataka education act, 1983 the government framed the karnataka pre-university education (academic, registration, administration and grant-in-aid etc.) rules, 2006. the sub-rule (2) and (3) of rule 21 of the said rules reads as below- (2) ..... karnataka in w.p. no. 25447/2010 against the directions given in rule 21(2) and (3) of the karnataka pre-university education (academic, registration, administration and grant-in-aid etc.) rules, 2006. and whereas, the special leave petition no. 22176-22186/10 filed by the state in the hon'ble supreme court of .....

Vidya (Dr.) W/O Vasant Baile and ors. Vs. Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR541; 2008(3)BomCR872; 2007(5)MhLj276

..... the petition. he submitted that the provisions of ordinance no. 17 of 2006 are ultra-vires powers of the university to make such an ordinance in view of the provisions of sections 51 and 52 of the maharashtra universities act, (hereinafter referred to as the act). second challenge to the action of the university is based on infringement of rights guaranteed under articles 14 and 16 ..... this deeming provision ordinance 122 would be deemed to be a statute made under the maharashtra universities act, 1994, since it deal with subject enumerated in section 51 of the act. therefore, according to the learned advocate the amendment sought to be made by ordinance no. 17 of 2006 was incompetent since it did not follow procedure for making a statute prescribed under section .....

Rajeev Kumar Bhardwaj vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University an ...

Court : Delhi

..... was also returned without making any entry for reasons best known to the respondent no.1/university.14. learned counsel for the... petitioner submits that as per clause 32 of statute 32 of the guru gobind singh indraprastha university act, statutes w.p.(c) 4543/2016 page 9 of 15 and ordinances provides that where no ..... finalized any rules so far regarding past service benefits and that the employees of the university are covered under contributory provident fund scheme. the service book of the... ..... delhi.13. after a silence of more than one year, the university/ the respondent no.1, in an illegal and arbitrary manner, informed the registry of this court vide impugned letter dated 21.3.2016, inter alia that the university is governed by ggsip university act, statutes and ordinances etc. contained therein and has not yet .....

Srinivas Kalluri and Others Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Scie ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1233; 1999(3)KarLJ73

..... the total marks in practical/clinical examinations and internal assessment combined together in each of the examination subjects.5-a. the university act, also authorises the syndicate of the university to make ordinances and amend or repeal the same from tune to time. the ordinance so made may provide for various ..... then says the statutes, ordinances and rules are made under the appropriate provisions of rajiv gandhi university act, the first vice-chancellor may adopt with such modifications the statutes, rules and regulations made under karnataka state universities act with the previous approval of the chancellor and such statutes, rules, regulations and ordinances are ..... this court does not require any lengthy discussion, since the relevant provisions of the university act are explicit and most unambiguous.12. section 60 of the act provides for transitory powers of the first vice-chancellor of the university. sub-section (2) of section 60 mandates that the vice-chancellor in consultation .....

Sorathia Velji Ratna and Co. Vs. Gujarat Agricultural University

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)4GLR890

..... also common seal and it has distinct legal entity to sue or to sued in the name of the university. consequently for all the purposes it is a statutory corporation created under the university act. the officers of the university are enumerated under section 9 of the university act. section 10 provides that the governor of the state of gujarat shall be the chancellor of the ..... pointed out by the learned counsel for the appellant in support of his contention and also the provisionsof the gujarat agricultural university act, 1969 (for short 'university act'). as against this the contention of shri desai, learned counsel for the respondent has been that no interference in the judgment and decree of the trial court is required. his .....

M. Aamira Fathima and Others Vs. The Annamalai University, Cuddalore D ...

Court : Chennai

..... 2014-15, is a constituent of annamalai university. annamalai university was established under the annamalai university act, 1928. due to unfortunate events which led to the closure of the annamalai university, the government of tamil nadu had to pass annamalai university act, 2013, repealing the 1928 act. after the passing of 2013 act, the university came under the control of the state under ..... wlr 691]; (v) dr.m.ashiq nihmathullah v. the government of tamil nadu [2005 wlr 697]; (vi) s.arulselvan v. the government of tamil nadu [2006 wlr 165]; (vii) cochin university of science and technology v. thomas p.john [(2008) 8 scc 82]; (viii) modern dental college and research centre v. state of m.p. [2010 ..... are not only binding on the selection committee and the authorities, but also binding on the students. 41. in s.arulselvan v. government of tamil nadu [2006 wlr 165], this court has held that even the court does not have the power to amend or alter or add something to the prospectus. at the same .....

Harichandra Jethmal Gandhi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(4)BomCR688

..... .r. dated 27.2.1989, the service as 'teacher' should be computed. he has relied upon the definition of the expression 'teacher' given in section 2(13) of the nagpur university act, 1974 which inter alia includes demonstrator and tutor also. however, what needs to be seen is that in clauses 12 and 13 the word used is not 'teacher' but 'lecturer ..... service of the petitioners as demonstrators/tutors should be taken into account while computing their services as lecturers because their conditions of service are regulated by the provisions in the university act and, therefore, the state government or the director of education (higher education) m.s. pune, have no power to interfere with the decisions taken by the nagpur and amravati .....

Subrata Sundar Das and ors. Vs. Tripura Central University and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : AIR2009Gau185

..... view there is no substance in any of the contentions as will be apparent from our conclusions noted above and the decisions of this court bearing on this point. the university act, as pointed out, merely prescribed a minimum qualification for entry into the higher courses of study. there was no regulation to the effect that admission to higher course of ..... validity of these regulations are not under challenge in these writ petitions. these regulations have, admittedly, come into force w.e.f. 2006-07 academic session of the university.12. there is no dispute that the law course, in question, comprises of five parts, namely, part-i, part-ii, part-iii, part-iv and part-v. in ..... state of andhra pradesh v. lavu narendranath reported in : (1971) 1 scc 607 : air 1971 sc 2560, k. h. siraj v. high court of kerala reported in : (2006) 6 scc 395 : air 2006 sc 2339 and all india council for technical education v. surinder kumar dhawan reported in : 2009 air scw 3124 : air 2009 sc 2322.10. as far as mr .....

Dr. G.Marulasiddaiah Vs. Dr. T.G. Siddapparadhya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1971SC2264; (1971)IILLJ349SC; (1971)1SCC568; [1971]3SCR621

..... order of the appellant's appointment was not to be placed before the chancellor for his approval under section 26(4) of the mysore university act. this was occasioned by the fact that the university had taken steps to make another appointment necessitated by the order of the division bench of the high court and had asked the appellant ..... professor in sanskrit by the board of appointments on the sole ground of non-compliance with rule 5 of the supplementary rules promulgated under the mysore university act, 1956. that rule provides :the board of appointments shall give in writing the reasons for the selection of any candidate and also the basis on which ..... consider the matter for a second time.6. the position in law appears to be as follows. the mysore university act, 1956 came into force on october 3, 1956. section 13 of the act sets out the authorities of the university which include inter alia the senate, the syndicate, the academic council and the board of appointments. different sections .....