Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sikkim university act 2006 section 18 the librarian Court: karnataka Page 4 of about 898 results (0.111 seconds)

Mar 05 2001 (HC)

R.V. Dental College Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant302; ILR2001KAR3502

..... be made by a new college seeking affiliation to any university or by an existing college seeking affiliation to a new course of study to such course, unless, ..... to be legally established even without an affiliation from the university which has to confer degrees to the students admitted to the same taking the most liberal view of what may constitute, 'establishing of an institution'.12. section 53 (10 (a)) of the karnataka universities act, 1976, provides thus :--'no admission of students shall ..... notifications dated 10th of august 1999 issued by the govt. of india in terms of section 10(2) of the dentist act that dental qualifications awarded by bangalore university and three other universities in the state of karnataka were recognised only by reference to the institutions mentioned in the notifications. he submitted that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2011 (HC)

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Dr. R. Halesha Son of Rangappa and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 590 concludes the debate: "the provisions of the ugc act re not in conflict with the provisions of the open university act. it is bevond any cavil of doubt that the ugc act shall prevail over the open university act. it has, however, been argued that the open university act is a later act. but we have noticed hereinbefore that the nodal. ..... government of india, vide its letter read above, has revised the pay scales of the teaching community of the central universities based on the recommendations of vi central pay commission with effect from 01.01.2006. it is also decided to enhance the a.ge of superannuation of teachers. government of karnataka has also examined this ..... superannuation for teachers in central educational institution has already been enhanced to sixty five years vide the department of higher education letter no.fno.1. 19/2006-u.11 dated 23.3.2007 for those involved in class room teaching in order to attract eligible persons to the teaching career and to retain teachers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2020 (HC)

The State Of Karnataka Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... because of this legal battle between the two sides, with which they are not associated. (viii) as to conflict between section 5 of the rajiv gandhi university of health sciences act, 1994 and the provisions of ugc regulations: (a) mr. ponnanna, learned counsel appearing for the moogambigai trust contends that the provisions of section 5 of ..... and research institute represented by its registrar dr c b palanivelu, s/o late sri c k balakrishnan, aged about52years, dr mgr educational and research institute (deemed to be university) university campus, periyar evr highway, maduravoyal, chennai-600095. petitioners (by sri. a s ponnanna, senior counsel for smt. leela p devadiga, advocate) 2 and:1. the union ..... request of moogambigai trust made way back in the year 2003-04, had accorded linguistic minority status (tamil) to the 2nd petitioner-college vide order dated 8.2.2006 at annexure-r1; relevant conditions subject to which this status was accorded, are as under: (2) p lp z w g v s c as v z .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2020 (HC)

Moogambigai Charitable Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... because of this legal battle between the two sides, with which they are not associated. (viii) as to conflict between section 5 of the rajiv gandhi university of health sciences act, 1994 and the provisions of ugc regulations: (a) mr. ponnanna, learned counsel appearing for the moogambigai trust contends that the provisions of section 5 of ..... and research institute represented by its registrar dr c b palanivelu, s/o late sri c k balakrishnan, aged about52years, dr mgr educational and research institute (deemed to be university) university campus, periyar evr highway, maduravoyal, chennai-600095. petitioners (by sri. a s ponnanna, senior counsel for smt. leela p devadiga, advocate) 2 and:1. the union ..... request of moogambigai trust made way back in the year 2003-04, had accorded linguistic minority status (tamil) to the 2nd petitioner-college vide order dated 8.2.2006 at annexure-r1; relevant conditions subject to which this status was accorded, are as under: (2) p lp z w g v s c as v z .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1991 (HC)

Modern Homeopaths Society Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3924; 1992(1)KarLJ349

..... on the recommendation of the local inquiry committee appointed by the university, the state government by its order dated 23-6-1989 directed the university to give affiliation as required under section 53 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (for short 'the act'). the university gave affiliation on certain conditions as is clear from letter dated ..... 27-7-1989 - annexure-d. the petitioners further contend that the college strictly adhered to the conditions imposed and the standards laid down. the university on being satisfied continued affiliation ..... 92 to have the said course. i am inclined to hold that proviso to sub-section (9) of section 53 of the act does not give power to the university to refuse affiliation by itself without submitting the application and all proceedings, if any, of the academic council and of the syndicate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1996 (HC)

Monika Pahwa Vs. Director of Medical Education

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR845; 1996(6)KarLJ365

..... with the rules i.e. 28 free seats, 22 payment seats and 9 seats under management quota. therefore, so far as section 53(10) of the universities act is concerned, out of 12 remaining students, one can still be accommodated within the permissible intake.35. accordingly, in my opinion, so far as petitioners nos ..... of a college fixed by the affiliating authority. clauses (b) and (c) of sub-section (10) of section 53 of the universities act, which were inserted by karnataka act 23 of 1986, provide thus:'(b) the maximum number of students to be admitted to a course of study shall not exceed the intake ..... .2. the rights of college managements to admit students are governed by the provisions of the karnataka universities act, 1976 (in short, 'the university act'), the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 (in short, 'the capitation fee act'), the rules framed thereunder, namely the karnataka selection of candidates for admission to engineering, medical and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2001 (HC)

Dr. R.R. Patil and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant211; ILR2002KAR300; 2003(4)KarLJ331

..... any other person carrying on the activity of imparting education in medicine or engineering leading to a degree conferred by a university established under the karnataka state universities act. 1976 (karnataka act no. 28 of 1976) and any other educational institution, or class of such institution as the government may. by ..... very threshold that the ugc. mci and dci have been established under the parliamentary acts. these acts are university grants commission act, 1956, indian medical council act. 1956 and the dentists act. 1948 (in short the 'ugc act', 'mci act' and 'dentists act,). the said bodies, in order to carry out their statutory duties have framed regulations ..... medical council of india and national council for teacher education, established or incorporated by, or under, a central act or a state act, and includes an institution deemed to be a university declared by the central government on the recommendation of the commission under section 3 and all institutions recognised by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2021 (HC)

Dr Chikkalingaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in ilr2016karnataka2068 21. in the course of hearing, it was observed by the court, after going through the various provisions of the university act and more particularly, section 11 of the act that the appointments ought to and can be done by the pro-chancellor and that the state government has no role in the ..... state of karnataka, dept. of health and family welfare (medical education), vikas soudha, dr.ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru-560001, rep by its addl. secretary. 22. rajiv gandhi university of health sciences (karnataka), bengaluru4h t block, jayanagar, bengaluru-560041. represented by its registrar.3. dr. m. ravikumar r/at no.12, lakshminarasimha nilaya, thimmakka layout ..... reliance on the observations in paras 21 and 24 of malik mazhar sultan and another vs. u.p.public service commission and others reported in (2006) 9 scc507 would contend that the administrative actions cannot override the statutory 29 provisions and hence the restrictive clause of until further orders incorporated in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2021 (HC)

Dr Umesh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in ilr2016karnataka2068 21. in the course of hearing, it was observed by the court, after going through the various provisions of the university act and more particularly, section 11 of the act that the appointments ought to and can be done by the pro-chancellor and that the state government has no role in the ..... state of karnataka, dept. of health and family welfare (medical education), vikas soudha, dr.ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru-560001, rep by its addl. secretary. 22. rajiv gandhi university of health sciences (karnataka), bengaluru4h t block, jayanagar, bengaluru-560041. represented by its registrar.3. dr. m. ravikumar r/at no.12, lakshminarasimha nilaya, thimmakka layout ..... reliance on the observations in paras 21 and 24 of malik mazhar sultan and another vs. u.p.public service commission and others reported in (2006) 9 scc507 would contend that the administrative actions cannot override the statutory 29 provisions and hence the restrictive clause of until further orders incorporated in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2021 (HC)

Dr Deepthi Bhava Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in ilr2016karnataka2068 21. in the course of hearing, it was observed by the court, after going through the various provisions of the university act and more particularly, section 11 of the act that the appointments ought to and can be done by the pro-chancellor and that the state government has no role in the ..... state of karnataka, dept. of health and family welfare (medical education), vikas soudha, dr.ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru-560001, rep by its addl. secretary. 22. rajiv gandhi university of health sciences (karnataka), bengaluru4h t block, jayanagar, bengaluru-560041. represented by its registrar.3. dr. m. ravikumar r/at no.12, lakshminarasimha nilaya, thimmakka layout ..... reliance on the observations in paras 21 and 24 of malik mazhar sultan and another vs. u.p.public service commission and others reported in (2006) 9 scc507 would contend that the administrative actions cannot override the statutory 29 provisions and hence the restrictive clause of until further orders incorporated in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //