Sighted - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: sighted Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 3,679 results (0.101 seconds)Schad Vs. Borough of Mount Ephraim
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1981
schad v borough of mount ephraim 452 u s 61 1981 u s supreme court schad v borough of mount...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ii Vs. Western India Chamber o ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-27-1981
Reported in: (1982)26CTR(Bom)90; [1982]136ITR67(Bom)
sujata v manohar j 1 western india chamber of commerce ltd who are the assessees are a company incorporated under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAll India Reporter Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-27-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Bom41; 1982TAXLR2422
sujata manohar j 1 in this petition the first petitioners have sought approval under the provisions of s 214 1...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAcme Plastic Industries Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-04-1981
Reported in: [1981]48STC29(Bom)
sujata v manohar j 1 the applicants manufacture plastic grills for messrs philips india ltd these grills are supplied by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBatliboi and Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-02-1981
Reported in: [1981]47STC321(Bom)
sujata v manohar j 1 the applicants m s batliboi company pvt ltd had entered into a contract with m...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Bombay Vs. L. D. Bhave a ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-13-1981
Reported in: [1981]47STC318(Bom)
sujata v manohar j 1 the respondents are dealers in burshane gas they also deal in gas stoves which are...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Bombay Vs. Vansal and Va ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-27-1981
Reported in: [1981]48STC419(Bom)
sujata v manohar j 1 the respondents are the assessees during the period 1st april 1964 to 13th august 1965...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHind Rectifiers Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-16-1981
Reported in: [1981]47STC303(Bom)
sujata v manohar j 1 the applicants are registered dealers under the bombay sales tax act 1959 they manufacture and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. S.C. Shah
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-03-1981
Reported in: (1981)25CTR(Bom)401; [1982]137ITR287(Bom); [1982]11TAXMAN66(Bom)
sujata manohar j 1 the assessees in income tax reference no 98 of 1971 and income tax reference no 194...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrataprai Arjandas Dhameja and anr. Vs. Bhupatsing Gagji (by Lrs.) and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Guj72; (1982)1GLR437
..... in jaikumar s case that the learned judges seem to have lost sight of this distinction emphasised in bradburn s case we find it ..... text of bradburn s case was not available the distinction was lost sight of deshpande j himself agrees that the omission of the paragraph ..... of justification that the learned judges of this high court has lost sight of the distinction 36 the next question that arises is was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial