Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sick industrial companies special provisions act 1985 chapter i preliminary Court: chennai Page 19 of about 220 results (0.291 seconds)

V.K.Palanisamy and ors. Vs. the Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu and ors ...

Court : Chennai

..... development [tacid] has been merged with small industries promotion corporation of tamil nadu [sipcot] and that the government, once again sought to acquire the same lands, which were already deleted from the earlier notification. as the petitioner was not put on notice by any notification by the government or by the special tahsildar [land acquisition], the second respondent herein ..... 1) whenever it appears to the appropriate government that land in any locality is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose or for a company, a notification to that effect shall be published in the official gazette and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be ..... in any land which has been notified under section 4, sub-section (1), as being needed or likely to be needed for a public purpose or for a company may, within thirty days from the date of the publication of the notification, object to the acquisition of the land or of any land in the locality, as .....

Maya Appliances Private Limited, Represented by Mr. Durairajan General ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(4)CTC334

..... the ad interim ex parts injunction granted, to the plaintiff is liable to be vacated.'. 33. there is no denial on the part of the defendant that the industrial drawings were supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant for the manufacture of jars to be supplied to the plaintiff. with regard to colour, get up and size, ..... consumers are deceptively led to believe similar product displayed in the promotional hoarding of the first respondent, comes from the house of the market leader and the most trusted company, viz., the applicant. taking advantage of the reputation and goodwill of the applicant's product, the respondents are falsely claiming and misleading the dealers, traders, distributors and ..... arise when dealing with cases of such drug, which cannot be sold except on prescription of a doctor and which are sold only by such persons who have special knowledge or expertise in the field. the manner in which trade in such medicines is carried on that is they can be sold only on prescription and .....

Power Control and Appliances Co. and Another Vs. Sumeet Machines Pvt. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1993Mad120

..... substantiate the contention of the respondents. ex. r.9 is the copy of the liability certificate given by the state industrial and investment corporation of maha-rashtra limited for the first respondent company.20. as many as 27 copies of documents have been relied on behalf of the first respondent as per the type ..... specifically pleaded in the affidavit and reply affidavit and by entering into various agreements among themselves and by remaining as share-holders and directors in the companies engaged in manufacturing the various domestic power operated machines like mixies, washing machines and so on by using the trade name and marketed sumeet mixies ..... infringement of trade mark and copyright. under these circumstances, i am fully satisfied to hold that in view of the peculiarity of the instant case and special circumstances which transpired exclusively among the family members of mrs. madhuri mathur, the doctrine of acquiescence and the honest and concurrent user will attract directly and .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Eastern Seafoods Exports (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]215ITR64(Mad)

..... the interest and the rented land and the effective source - not land - has become apparent.' 10. in cambay electric supply industrial co. ltd. v. cit : [1978]113itr84(sc) , the supreme court considered a claim to special deduction under section 80e of the 1961 act as it stood prior to the amendment by the finance (no. 2) act ..... the whole or substantially the whole of the affairs in india of any other company, at or in connection with the termination of his office or the modification of the terms and conditions relating thereto; (c) any person, by whatever name called, ..... other payment due to or received by, - (a) any person, by whatever name called, managing the whole or substantially the whole of the affairs of an indian company, at or in connection with the termination of his management or the modification of the terms and conditions relating thereto; (b) any person, by whatever name called, managing .....

M. Senthil Kumar and anr. Vs. Sudha Mills (India) Private Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas1029(Mad)

..... remedies are provided by the statute in very many matters concerning the management and running of a company. a special forum itself has been created, and with an expertise and daily experience in relation to the problems in the working of the companies--the company law board. it now adjudicates many such disputes which come before it as provided under the ..... referred to a number of authorities in support of their submissions.26. learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision of this court in the case of ramakrishna industries (p.) ltd. v. p.r. ramakrishnan 1988 64 comp cas 425 in support of his submission that this court has ample powers to make an ex parte ..... when other remedies are not efficacious enough to protect the general interest of the company.37. learned counsel also relied on the decision of the kerala high court in the case of jose j. kadavil v. malabar industrial co. ltd.: mathew (k.t.) v. malabar industrial co, ltd. 1986 59 comp cas 969 wherein the court pointed out .....

S.V.S. Oil Mills Vs. S.V.S. Agro Refineries P. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2002(24)PTC41(Mad)

..... for an injunction. 3. the respondents' case is briefly as follows: the 2nd respondent's son filed the counter in the capacity of director of first respondent company on behalf of the company and the respondent. the allegations in it are as follows:- the partners in the applicant firm are his maternal uncles and his father, the 2nd respondent retired ..... relevant, this court in dyechem's case sought to examine the difference in the two marks piknic and picnic. it applied three tests they being (1) is there any special aspect of the common feature which has been copied (2) mode in which the parts are put together differently i.e., whether dissimilarity of the part of parts is ..... is only for the purposes of the act. it does not affect the rights of the proprietor exceptsuch as arise out of registration. that is to say, the special advantages which the act gives to the proprietor by reason of the registration of his trade mark do not extend do the parts or matters which he disclaims. in short .....

Sanjay Gupta, and ors. Vs. the Corporation of Chennai, and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... board of religious endowments {air 1930 madras 629}(ii) k.meenakshi ammal vs. commissioner, hindu religious and charitable endowments {air 1966 madras 475}(iii) radhakrishna rice mill company vs. jumma maseedh {air 2003 ap 70}71. narayanasami mudali, is a case where a suit brought by the board of commissioners for the modification of a scheme ..... decision in k.meenakshi ammal, also arose out of a compromise sought to be recorded under order xxiii, rule 3, cpc. the decision in radhakrishna rice mill company, quotes with approval the decision of this court in narayanasami mudali, and is also for the same proposition that compromises recorded in respect of the properties of a ..... sale by private negotiations which is not visible to the public eye and which may even give rise to public suspicion should not therefore be permitted, unless there are special reasons to justify the same.90. in gowri shankar vs. joshi amba shankar family trust {1996 (3) scc 310}, the apex court went a step further. .....

K.Chandrasekara Rao and ors. Vs. C.Masilamani and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... up. whether a certain transaction was vitiated on the ground of undue influence is primarily on the decision of fact as per the decision in ladli prashad v. karnal distillers company, [air 1963 sc at page 1279].115.in shamu patter v. abdul kadir ravuthan and others, [35 madras at page 607 (pc)], it is held that an ..... and the attesting witness must sign as such.116.the mode of proving the will does not ordinarily differ from that of proving any other document except as to special requirement of attestation prescribed by section 63 of the indian succession act.117.it is to be remembered that all legitimate, suspicious circumstances made the early onus, a ..... ammal and one of the executors of s.narasimhan was attending on her and srinivasan, another executor was known to her for quite a long time and helped the sickly woman during her last days. after her death, the funeral ceremonies were performed by the purohit under the instructions of the 3rd respondent/ 3rd defendant. further, jagannatha .....

K. Ayyamuthu and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC17

..... of pottaneri are subject matter of impugned land acquisition for the purpose of establishing coke-oven plant by a public limited company by name southern iron and steel company ltd., (siscol) co-promoted by tamil nadu industrial development corporation (tidco) and lakshmi mchine works ltd. (lmw). an extent of 523 acres of land had been ..... as section 3(c).'section 3(c) speaks about collector- expression 'collector' means the collector of a district, and includes a deputy commissioner and any officer specially appointed by the appropriate government to perform the functions of a collector under this act. section 4 sub-clause (2) enables the land acquisition officer or other ..... , there is no need of any lands for the requisi-tioning body, accordingly the present acquisition is not warranted;(ii) inasmuch as specific authorisation authorising the special tahsildar (land acquisition) to function as collector under section 3(c) of the act, is not find place in the tamil newspaper, it is not open .....

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Hindusthan Photo Film Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas960(Mad)

..... with approval in several subsequent decisions rendered by the apex court. such approval was reiterated in the recent case of the pradeshiya industrial & investment corporation of uttar pradesh v. north india petro chemicals ltd. .17. in palmer's company law, twenty-fourth edition, in chapter 88, winding up by the court, at 85-86 the law on this aspect is ..... be tried either before the court itself or in an action, or by some other proceeding'.'18. the supreme court in the case of madhusudan gordhandas & co. v. madhu woollen industries (p.) ltd. [1972] 42 comp. cas. 125 has laid down that:'two rules are well-settled. first, if the debt is a bona fide dispute and the defence ..... is by instituting a suit in the civil court, or filing a claim before a special tribunal in cases where such a remedy is provided, the companies act has conferred a right on the unpaid creditor to apply for winding up on the ground of the company's inability to pay its debts. the fact that the creditor can maintain a .....