Show - Judgment Search Results

Sri Susanta Kumar Banerjee and anr. Vs. Sri Lakshman Show

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)3CALLT280(HC)

..... business save and except licence for the year 1984 no other licence is forthcoming to show that there was no increase in the volume of the business the learned appellate court ..... this plaintiff no 1 it palpably holds goods that he could not produce any documents showing the expansion of his business although he made specific averment from the year 1978 his .....

Rikhabchand Manikchand Lalwani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(1)BomCR684

shah a p j 1 the land bearing survey no 383 admeasuring 8 h and 72 r situate within the...

Shri T.O. Aleyas, Shri Bobby Vs. St. Mary'S Hotels Private Limited

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... group and appointment of directors excluding the petitioners group at the board meetings which clearly shows that the board meetings were held without knowledge of the petitioners though the second respondent ..... are the family members belonging to the five branches these documents which are undisputed unequivocally show that the smhpl amp acecpl have been projected and treated as members in the st .....

M.S.D. Chandrasekar Raja Vs. Shree Bhaarathi Cotton Mills (P)

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2007)138CompCas881

..... exemption granted by the government of india but only the consumers the various correspondence show the lack of confidence between the petitioner and the second respondent the averments made in ..... behalf the sequence of events as borne out by the various correspondence on record show the irreconcilable differences and the great animosity developed between the petitioner and the second respondent .....

Shri T.A.M. Athavan Vs. Sun Freight Systems Private

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2004)4CompLJ593

..... mental condition of the petitioner has been dismissed for default there is no material to show whether the third respondent is pursuing her dismissed petition before the district judge court tuticorin ..... the petitioner irrespective of whether these acts are lawful or not the sequence of events shows that the petitioner being a promoter director with equal shareholding and in the joint management .....

Dr. S. Mangalam Srinivasan Vs. Mani Forgings Private Limited,

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas544

..... chand agarwal v associated limestone ltd 1998 92 cc 525 to show that the petitioner shall fulfill the preliminary condition under section 397 ..... hussain v rajiv gandhi 1986 supp supreme court cases 315 to show that a petition filed under the representation of the people act ..... jain v sonia gandhi 2001 8 supreme court cases 233 to show that the petitions which are hopelessly vague and completely bald not .....

Shri Dhananjay Pande Vs. Dr. Bais Surgical and Medical

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2005)125CompCas626

..... against the petitioner s investment in the company this itself would show that no allotment of shares had been made to the petitioner ..... 148 lacs towards the shares this amount was invested in 1997 showing this amount as the share application money for debt equity ratio ..... as a director the md there is nothing on record to show when the respondents had realized found out about the alleged fraudulent .....

Shri M.S.D. Chandrasekar Raja Vs. Shree Bhaarathi Cotton Mills

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2005)57SCL72

..... exemption granted by the government of india but only the consumers the various correspondence show the lack of confidence between the petitioner and the second respondent the averments made in ..... behalf the sequence of events as borne out by the various correspondence on record show the irreconcilable differences and the great animosity developed between the petitioner and the second respondent .....

Shri M. Lakshmi Narayanan Vs. Rasi Nidhi Limited and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2005)126CompCas824

..... 2002 moreover the company has not produced the articles of association showing any provision in respect of resignation of directors therefore the ..... in a summary proceeding is not convincing there are decisions to show that the company court should not hesitate to exercise its ..... 07 03 2003 was before the board of directors which clearly shows the intention of the petitioner that the resignation was to .....

Jindal Praxair Oxygen Company Vs. Praxair Pacific Limited, Jindal

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas905

..... the 8 th annual general meeting are not yet concluded the latter showed undue haste and proceeded with hearing of the application under section ..... cannanore v m k mohammed kunhi air 1969 sc 430 to show that the income tax appellate tribunal in exercise of the inherent ..... the vacancy a perusal of the relevant provisions of the act shows that the clb is empowered to exercise and discharge such powers .....