Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: shops and commercial establishments act 1961 chapter 2 registration of establishments Court: kerala Page 1 of about 8 results (0.086 seconds)

Augustine Mathai Vs. Appellate Authority

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ780Ker

..... place of public amusement or entertainments, and (5) such other establishment as declared by notification to be a commercial establishment. this definition will have to be read along with section 2(8) which says that an 'establishment' means a shop or a commercial establishment. 'shop' is defined in section 2(15) as any premises where any ..... of certain plantations and institutions belonging to the church are said to be the commercial activities. the church admits having plantations and institutions. but there is nothing to show that they are shops or commercial establishments or that petitioner was in any way employed in connection with them. from the ..... first respondent was justified in accepting the preliminary objection that the church is not a commercial establishment under the act. the church and the employment do not satisfy the requirements of the definitions of commercial establishment, establishment, shop or employment. there is no reason for interference.o.p. is dismissed. no costs .....

Augustine Mathai Vs. Appellate Authority and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ314Ker

..... act and in the light of the law categorically laid down by the apex court, we have no hesitation in holding that the church is neither a 'shop' nor a 'commercial establishment' as defined under the act. we agree with the reasoning of the learned single judge and hold that the first respondent was justified in accepting the ..... court in the decision reported in ramanathan v. state of kerala, 1991 (1) klt 89 held that office of a chartered accountant cannot be regarded as a 'commercial establishment' or 'shop' where services are rendered. the principle enunciated by the supreme court and this court will apply with equal force to the facts of the present case where we ..... and without assigning any reason as enjoined under the act and hence per se illegal. the 2nd respondent church contended inter alia that it is neither a shop nor a commercial establishment as defined under the act nor the provisions of the act are not attracted to them and hence the appeal itself is not maintainable under the act .....

V.N. Narayanan Nair and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1971Ker98

..... eke out their livelihood by doing more than, one kind of work. it is well-known that many persons who reside as kudikidappukars in rural areas work in commercial or industrial establishments in urban areas. for that reason one cannot say that they have ceased to be agricultural labourers. if a person and his family have their habitat in rural ..... area, the fact that all or some of them work in urban area in commercial or industrial establishments throughout the year or for part o it, would not take them out of the category of agricultural workers; and any reform intended to bring about a change ..... would be agrarian reform notwithstanding that portions of the land may not be agricultural land. the existence of a small tea-shop on a piece of paddy land would not change the character of even the site of the shop if the land is considered as a single unit as, for example, when the site is part of the same holding .....

Paul Vs. Saleena

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004(1)KLT924

..... not.15. the above mentioned judicial pronouncements and the principles laid down therein would clearly show that an unregistered document cannot be used for the purpose of establishing that that document created or declared or assigned or limited or extinguished a right to immovable property. period of lease is integral part of the agreement and ..... h. nagvi, air 1989 delhi 277, it was held that an unregistered document of lease can be looked into to know the purpose of letting whether residential or commercial, because the said term can be deemed to be collateral matter. in jagajit industries ltd. v. rajiv gupta, air 1981 delhi 359) it was held that term ..... room was never occupied by the first respondent after it is entrusted to him. though for sometime tenant has been conducting vegetable shop thereafter the shop room was kept closed. after 1994 the shop room was always kept locked and unoccupied. third petitioner gave evidence to the effect that first respondent has not used the building .....

V. Raman Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1994Ker393

..... regulations of the master plan. rule 15(7) deals with projections into and construction on open spaces; rule 35(1) deals with the size of the shop in a commercial area; rule 22(6)(b) deals with the structure design of the foundations. the proceedings of the government read with the recommendations of the chief town planner ..... power was the opinion of the government that it was not in the public interest to apply or any of the provisions of the act to an establishment or class of establishments and that opinion was founded on a consideration of the financial position and other relevant circumstances. therefore, parliament had clearly laid down principles and had ..... to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, exempt from the operation of all or any of the provisions of any scheme by various types of establishments. on the question of validity of section 17, the supreme court observed that exemptions were to be granted by the appropriate government only if in the opinion of .....

Holy Family English Medium L.P. School and Others Vs. Employees State ...

Court : Kerala

..... factories belonging to government) other than seasonal factories, power was reserved with the appropriate government to have it extended to any other establishment or class of establishments, industrial, commercial, agricultural or otherwise. in so far as the appropriate government is concerned, before issuance of any such notification, it mandatory to ..... year 2009) reads as follows: (e) employee means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop to do any skilled, semi skilled, or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work, whether the terms of such employment ..... - the payment of gratuity act 1972 provides for payment of gratuity to employees engaged in factories, mines, oilfields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops or other establishment and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. clause (c) of sub-section (3) of section 1 or the said act empowers the .....

P.Geetha Vs. The Kerala Livestock Development Board

Court : Kerala

..... , by notification in the official gazette, declare that all or any of the provisions of this act shall also apply to any other establishment or class of establishments, industrial, commercial, agricultural or otherwise. there is no gainsaying the fact that the staff rules of the first respondent board are applied within the statutory ..... convention (revised), 1952, the general conference of the ilo issued guidelines in its 88th session on 30th may, 2000. a perusal of those provisions amply establishes that maternity has been viewed holistically and more emphasis has been laid on pregnancy and child birth.44. indeed, the assisted reproductive technologies (regulation) bill, 2010 ..... 2 of the act, it applies, in the first instance, to every establishment being a factory, mine or plantation; to every shop or establishment within the meaning of any law for the time being in force in relation to wpc2068014 23 shops and establishments in a state, in which ten or more persons are employed, or were .....

First Commodities Exchange of India and2 Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Kerala

..... may be hurt. nor does it make any difference that other persons who may be injured are persons of the sums race or occupation. it is the fact, clearly established, of injury to the complainant-not to others-which justifies judicial interference." on this statement of the law, with which i entirely agree, the scope of the discussion ..... has been defined in the law w.a. no.1289 of 2011, etc. -:58. :- lexicon by p.ramanatha aiyar in the following words: "affair. business of any kind, commercial, professional or public; something to be transacted; matter; concern." 44. as noted above, rule 12, which prescribes the particulars to be sent in the annual report also contemplates details regarding ..... only the provisions of the parent act but also to the provisions of other acts. in the said case the apex court had occasion to consider the kerala abkari shops disposal rules, 2002. there cannot be any dispute to the proposition laid down in the said case, the power to frame rule and the power to impose .....

First Commodities Exchange of India and2 Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Kerala

..... may be hurt. nor does it make any difference that other persons who may be injured are persons of the sums race or occupation. it is the fact, clearly established, of injury to the complainant-not to others-which justifies judicial interference." on this statement of the law, with which i entirely agree, the scope of the discussion ..... has been defined in the law w.a. no.1289 of 2011, etc. -:58. :- lexicon by p.ramanatha aiyar in the following words: "affair. business of any kind, commercial, professional or public; something to be transacted; matter; concern." 44. as noted above, rule 12, which prescribes the particulars to be sent in the annual report also contemplates details regarding ..... only the provisions of the parent act but also to the provisions of other acts. in the said case the apex court had occasion to consider the kerala abkari shops disposal rules, 2002. there cannot be any dispute to the proposition laid down in the said case, the power to frame rule and the power to impose .....

First Commodities Exchange of India and2 Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Kerala

..... may be hurt. nor does it make any difference that other persons who may be injured are persons of the sums race or occupation. it is the fact, clearly established, of injury to the complainant-not to others-which justifies judicial interference." on this statement of the law, with which i entirely agree, the scope of the discussion ..... has been defined in the law w.a. no.1289 of 2011, etc. -:58. :- lexicon by p.ramanatha aiyar in the following words: "affair. business of any kind, commercial, professional or public; something to be transacted; matter; concern." 44. as noted above, rule 12, which prescribes the particulars to be sent in the annual report also contemplates details regarding ..... only the provisions of the parent act but also to the provisions of other acts. in the said case the apex court had occasion to consider the kerala abkari shops disposal rules, 2002. there cannot be any dispute to the proposition laid down in the said case, the power to frame rule and the power to impose .....