Court : Supreme Court of India
..... kedia 142. in hingir-rampur coal co. ltd. v. state of orissa,202 writ petitions were filed before this court challenging the orissa mining areas development fund act 1952203 which levied cess on the petitioner s colliery. the petitioner argued that the cess levied under the orissa act was beyond the legislative competence of ..... the division of legislative powers between the union and states 393 peter brown and patrick bond, rating valuation: principles and practice) (3rd edn, elsevier) 13. 394 assessment committee of the metropolitan borough of poplar v. roberts, [1922]. 2 ac93395 peter brown and patrick bond (supra n393) 284. 396 section 5, non-domestic rating (miscellaneous ..... prepared by shri b n rau, the constitutional adviser adopted the above provision in draft entry 43 of the provincial legislative list.331 the expert committee on financial provisions suggested the deletion of the words hearths and windows from draft entry 43 of the provincial legislative list on the ground that such .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... against the legislative policy of the advocates act.90. dignity is crucial to substantive equality. the dignity of an individual encompasses the right of the individual to develop their potential to the fullest.96 the right to pursue a profession of one s choice and earn livelihood is integral to the dignity of an individual. ..... enable an advocate to avail of a lifetime benefit of various welfare schemes. this amount is in addition to the enrolment fee of rupees six thousand, processing/ development fees of rupees seven thousand, and other miscellaneous charges. the sbc justified charging rupees six thousand as the enrolment fee on the basis of a bci resolution ..... first 5 years the proportion of the contribution may be reconsidered. 17 (emphasis added) 17. the committee was aware of the fact that the sbcs will require funds to carry out their functions and duties. consequently, the committee recommended that an advocate should pay an enrolment fee of rupees five hundred to the sbcs at the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... point, lower down. in many places the children of untouchables are either excluded altogether from ordinary schools, although provided in whole or in part from public funds, otherwise they would be required to sit apart. in some cases, the untouchable children are required to 14 attend the classes standing outside the classroom. ..... violative article 29(2) which stipulates that no citizen shall be denied admission in any educational institution maintained by the state or receiving aid out of state funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language, or any of them. the court observed that article 29 does not contain an exception clause such ..... this and kashmir committee the jammu and kashmir scheduled castes and backward classes (reservation) rules, 1970 were framed by the state government.7. 1973 dhebar commission this commission was set up to study the vulnerable tribal ministry of tribal groups. it suggested creation of affairs separate category for the less developed among the tribal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... discrimination which stifles their personal growth. 188 when caste prejudices manifest in institutional settings, such as prisons, they create further restrictions on the personal development and reformation of individuals from marginalized communities. when prison manuals restrict the reformation of prisoners from marginalized communities, they violate their right to life ..... to carry out their hereditary trades within prisons, the supposed higher caste prisoners caste privileges were preserved. 156 the 1919-1920 indian jail committee report suggested classification in prisons should ensure that the young and inexperienced offenders were not contaminated by the influence of the more experienced, habitual ..... entertainment; or (b) the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained wholly or partly out of state funds or dedicated to the use of the general public. article 15(1) imposes an enforceable obligation on the state to not discriminate against citizens on .....
Tag this Judgment!