Setting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: setting Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 311 results (0.108 seconds)

Nov 18 2002 (TRI)

Set India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-18-2002

Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT190Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the question for consideration in this appeal is the classification of the goods that the appellant imported these goods...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 2002 (HC)

Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-19-2002

Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN34(Guj)

orderm s shah j both these appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 25 1 2002 of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2002 (TRI)

R.M.i. Foods Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC627Tri(Delhi)

1 the appellants manufacture malted food under horlicks brand falling under chapter sub heading no 1901 19 they received horlicks...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2002 (TRI)

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT218Tri(Bang.)

1 appellants are manufacturers of computers and peripherals thereof they avail modvat credit on certain items and use the same...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 2002 (TRI)

Q.H. Talbros Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-04-2002

Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC220

1 this is an appeal challenging the imposition of penalty of rs 46 926 shri j s agarwal learned advocate...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2002 (TRI)

Bpl Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT615Tri(Bang.)

..... adjudication on eligibility the question of limitation penalty and interest is also left open by setting aside the entire findings as regards eligibility duty demand limitation penalty interest to be determined .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Acc Machinery Co. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Feb-28-2002

Reported in: (2004)(165)ELT0Tri(Chennai)

..... the rate of 15 ad valorem in view of above the revenue has prayed for setting aside the order of the commissioner appeals and restoration of the order in original no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2002 (TRI)