Set Chisel - Judgment Search Results

State of Kerala Vs. Kuttappan

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2005(2)KLT664

in the appeal the appeal is dismissed it in well settled law that when an appeal is filed against an acquittal witnesses were examined for the recovery of m o 22 chisel cobbler s knife m o 6 watch and strap it

Margra Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC91

..... along the edges while leaving rough protuberant faces dressed with the pick bushing hammer or chisel etc furrowed with the drag comb etc planed sand dressed ground polished chamfered moulded turned ..... pedestals high or low reliefs crosses figures of animals bowls vases cups cachou boxes writing sets ashtrays paper weights artificial fruit and foliage etc ornamental goods of stone combined with other .....

James Mackintosh and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)93ITD466(Mum.)

approval for this reason also 30 for the detailed reasons set out above we see no reason to interfere in the

Sahyog Mahila Mandal and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2004)2GLR1764

held that it was not correct to say that the set of facts to be proved in prosecution under sections 3

Tapender Singh Vs. Jai Singh and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: III(2004)ACC775,2005ACJ962

the division bench in united india insurance co ltd v sethu madhavan 1993 acj 1035 kerala have held the administrative and

Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jodhpur

Reported in: (2004)(3)SLJ169CAT

temporary status this has no reasonable basis it is a settled law that ad hoc service followed by regularisation will be

N.J. Nayudu and Company Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(2)BomCR716

an order setting aside an arbitral award or refusing to set aside an arbitral award under section 34 thus as the

C.S.T. Vs. Suraj Rubber Industries

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2008)11VST480(All)

revision is allowed and the order of the tribunal is set aside no 15 order as to costs indian penal code

Suriya Begum Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Reported in: (2005)(2)SLJ395CAT

future employment the termination order is therefore liable to be set aside and the applicant is entitled to be reinstated on

Jai Kamal Sahu Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

passed against the accused appellant under section 448 ipc stand set aside he accused appellant shall stand convicted for offence punishable