Served - Judgment Search Results

Municipal Council, Tonk Vs. Serve Seva Sansthan Tonk and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR2004Raj96; RLW2004(2)Raj957

cases relating to public utility services ii the public utility services like transport of passengers or goods by air road or

O.N.G.C. General Workers Union, Rep. by Its General Secretary, M. Geor ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)IIILLJ812Mad

of mandamus directing the respondents 1 2 to regularise the services of nine employees 2 it has been asserted that nine

Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Servs. Vs. Guardianship Es ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... oasdi or ssi benefits and for whom the department serves or has served as representative payee in their 1995 class action filed ..... curiae 376 376 washington state dept of social and health servs v guardianship estate of keffeler although the social security administration ..... ibid 392 392 washington state dept of social and health servs v guardianship estate of keffeler iii the department s reimbursement .....

Entergy LA., Inc. Vs. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the tariff were not unjust unreasonable or unduly discriminatory entergy servs inc 80 ferc 61 197 pp 61 786 61 788 1997 ..... nantahala power light company and tapoco inc the former of which served retail customers in north carolina both nantahala and tapoco provided power ..... grid this low cost power was apportioned 80 to tapoco which served exclusively the corporate parent of tapoco and nantahala and 20 .....

Bhaskar B. Bhosle Prop. of Rajnigandha Restaurant and Bar Vs. State of ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR56; 2003(6)BomCR592; 2003(4)MhLj328

j s pawar learned additional government pleader appears and waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent nos 1

Connaught Plaza Restaurant (P) Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT187TriDel

..... the department that cup or cone in which the soft serve is served is bearing any brand name the commissioner under the impugned ..... engaged in the business of selling burgers nuggets shakes soft serve etc through its fast foods restaurants known as mcdonalds family ..... specification for food engineering amp dairy technology that the soft serve mix manufactured by m s amrit foods has been classified .....

Kanhaiya Ice Factory Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Reported in: (2003)87ITD77Agra

..... officer may re issue the notice under section 148 and serve the same on the assessee in the manner prescribed under ..... and completion of assessment reassessment under section 147 respectively can be served at any time irrespective of the limitation prescribed under section ..... 3 therefore is that the assessing officer could proceed to serve the notices under section 148 upon the assessee during the .....

Pharmaceutical Research and Mfrs. of America Vs. Walsh

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a significant burden on medicaid recipients by requiring prior authorization in certain circumstances without serving any valid medicaid purpose and that the program effectively regulates out of state ..... access to medically necessary prescription drugs covered under the medicaid program it nevertheless may serve a medicaid purpose by safeguard ing against unnecessary utilization and assur ing that .....

Bhagwati Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2003)184CTR(Cal)12

..... of town and despite several attempts the notice could not be served six months expired on 27th aug 2001 subsequently in the ..... in any event section 2 and section 153 used the expression serve and deal with service whereas the legislature used the expression given ..... two different fields 18 section 153 requires that notice shall be served by sending through registered post to the person for whom it .....

J and K State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Nanchhattar Kaur and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 3(2005)ACC655

..... clearly mentioned that the respondent no 1 has been duly served through registered cover respondent no 1 was not subsequently summoned ..... service was effected at jammu and the petitioner corporation was served for 18 12 1986 through registered a p cover according ..... as aforesaid refuses to sign the acknowledgement or where the serving officer after using all due and reasonable diligence cannot find .....