Sequent - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: sequent Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 325 results (0.083 seconds)Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Parshadi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2002
Reported in: 2003(69)DRJ751
..... i e land policy came during the pendency of the writ petition and these sub sequent events supported the prayer cause of action already in existence the respondents herein had already .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayanta Kumar Behera Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(II)OLR599
..... unsound mind his conduct prior to the commission of offence at the time and sub sequent to the occurrence has to be taken into consideration it has been further held that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJia Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2002
Reported in: 99(2002)DLT392; 2002(64)DRJ285
..... to be the sale consideration 9 as regards the land which was acquired by sub sequent notification dated 14 7 1982 the reference court also upon the sale deed of 10 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAar Kay Concast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT643TriDel
..... abatement claim though they produced an extract of rg i register to the commissioner sub sequently i am unable to take these lapses in a light vein having regard to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.C. JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT733Tri(Kol.)kata
..... under bill of entry dt 6 3 98 and thereafter one more consignment was imported sequently the last two consignments were warehoused and not cleared in all these consignments of bam .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Daljit Kaur Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: (2003)134PLR305
..... plot measuring 8 marlas and one petitioner claimed allotment of plot measuring six marlas sub sequently the price of the plot was raised to rs 85 per sq yard and petitioners .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Rajachar and ors. Vs. Kodandarama and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-07-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALT(Cri)47; ILR2002KAR2909; 2002(4)KarLJ292
orderm p chinnappa j 1 since common questions of law on the basis of identical facts were raised by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArya Abhushan Bhandar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(143)ELT25(SC)
order1 an issue raised by the appellants was that the search was conducted both in their shop and in their...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMedisetti Ravi Babu and anr. Vs. Pramida Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2002
Reported in: II(2003)BC527
orderc y somayajulu j 1 1st respondent filed the suit against the revision petitioners and 2nd respondent who are sureties...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamikannu and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-03-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALT(Cri)266; [2003(1)JCR150(SC)]; JT2002(10)SC37; (2002)10SCC24
b n agrawal j 1 the two appellants namely samikannu and krishnan along with accused nos 3 koonan manikandan and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial