Separated - Judgment Search Results

Helvering Vs. Fitch

Court: US Supreme Court

years before the divorce while respondent and his wife were separated and in settlement of a suit brought by her for

Sri Sri Sridhar Jew Vs. Manindra K. Mitter and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1941Cal272

..... best of my ability in dealing with the next question no administration without separate representation question 6 separate representation the two cases upon which mr roy has relied are surendrakrishna roy ..... which fact coupled with peculiar language which is not appropriate to an insistence upon separate representation to safeguard legal rights leads to the conclusion that having regard to all .....

Mahabir Rai and ors. Vs. Rajender Rai and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1940All368

..... to this khata in the khewat although the revenue is separately assessed in each khata this conclusion is obviously wrong because ..... is true that the revenue of each serial number is separately entered nevertheless the mahal being joint each and every cosharer ..... case it appeared from the khewat that there were separate khatas assigned to separate groups of cosharers which had specific areas fixed and .....

Helvering Vs. Leonard

Court: US Supreme Court

..... suit was pending respondent and his wife entered into a separation agreement and together with a corporate trustee executed a trust ..... goldfish and schnitzer v buerger supra the provisions of the separation agreement and the trust agreement here in question specifically relate ..... representative footnote 2 except on discontinuance or dismissal of the divorce action footnote 3 it was so amended three times .....

Helvering Vs. Fuller

Court: US Supreme Court

appeals for the second circuit syllabus in compliance with a separation agreement approved by a decree of divorce in nevada the

ismail Ahmed Peepadi Vs. MomIn Bibi and Others

Court: Privy Council

sir george rankin the appellant ismail ahmed peepadi herein called the plaintiff was born on 1st may 1919 on 12th...

Nawab Sardar Narharsingji Ishvarsingji Vs. the Secretary of State for ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1941Bom161; (1941)43BOMLR167

..... the arable and non arable portions in the wanta were not separately shown but only the total area was shown as including ..... a detailed survey of the same by showing the three villages separately and deducting the kharaba portion of the wanta from its ..... regard kharabas as their property but were anxious to have them separately stated and deducted and to have their estate surveyed the interpretation .....

Umade Rajaha Raje Damara Kumara Venkatalingama Nayanim Bahadur Varu, R ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1942)2MLJ47

..... devolved on him from his father would continue to subsist separately from the equity of redemption subsequently purchased by him or ..... expediency of avoiding the coalescence of interest and preserving the separation of title may be apparent in short the question to ..... proceeding from the mukarraridars and upon the other hand the separate grant of subsisting right to the mukarraridars by their lease .....

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Nandalal Chowdhury

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1941Cal602

..... 1929 he applied to the corporation to have the outhouses assessed separately from the main building the only answer given and repeated ..... unjust of the corporation to refuse to assess the outhouses separately on 20th june 1932 the defendant wrote to the assessor ..... the corporation and its officers repeatedly refused to assess the outhouses separately upon the pretence that they had no power under the .....

Sheldon Vs. Metro-goldwyn Pictures Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... belford cases supra it had been recognized that if a separation of distinct profit derived from such additions or improvements ..... was analogous to that presented where it is necessary to separate interstate from intrastate earnings and expenses in order to determine ..... were necessarily commingled it was essential therefore that they be separated or apportioned between what was covered by the patent and .....