Sensitive - Judgment Search Results

P. Pathrakah Nadachi Vs. V. Subbiah Nadar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1981Mad287; (1981)1MLJ463

natarajan j 1 this appeal has been referred to this bench because mohan j before whom it came up for...

Road Transport Corporation and ors. Vs. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and or ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1981Bom299; (1981)83BOMLR173; 1981MhLJ855

bhonsale j 1 this appeal is preferred by original defendants challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned civil...

Mahant Ram Kishan Dass Vs. State of Punjab and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1576; (1983)1SCC377

..... of living dismissal of several hundreds with disastrous impact on numerous families is of such sensitive social concern that save in exceptional situations the law will inhibit such a lethal step .....

Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; [1983]1SCR145a

..... individual culprit coming up before court social justice has many facets and judges have a sensitive secular and civilising role in suppressing grievous injustice to humanist values by inflicting condign ..... j himself has lamented the impossibility of formulating standards or guidelines in this highly sensitive area and pointed out in the majority judgment there is little agreement among penologists .....

Fullilove Vs. Klutznick

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the congressional hearings and debates concerning the amendment focused primarily on the politically sensitive problems of priority and geographic distribution of grants under the supplemental appropriation footnote ..... certainly not a legitimate purpose for our federal government which should be especially sensitive to discrimination on grounds of birth distinctions between citizens solely because of .....

Harris Vs. Mcrae

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the political majority s judgment of the morally acceptable and socially desirable preference on a sensitive and intimate decision that the constitution entrusts to the individual worse yet the hyde amendment ..... to term resulting in a live birth a bortion and childbirth when stripped of the sensitive moral arguments surrounding the abortion controversy are simply two alternative page 448 u s 333 .....

Prem Shankar Shukla Vs. Delhi Administration

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC1535; 1980CriLJ930; (1980)3SCC526; [1980]3SCR855

..... personhood too often using the mask of dangerousness and security this sensitized perspective shared by court and counsel alike has prompted us ..... access to human justice is the essence of article 32 and sensitized by this dynamic perspective we have examined the facts and ..... silent meditation but part of the nation s founding charter in sensitized animation no prisoner is beneath the law and while the .....

Snepp Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... no intelligence agency or responsible government official could be assured that an employee privy to sensitive information might not conclude on his own innocently or otherwise that it should be disclosed ..... contract had submitted his manuscript for review and the agency had found it to contain sensitive material presumably if one accepts snepp s present assertion of good intentions an effort would .....

Fuzlunbi Vs. K. Khader Vali and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC1730; 1980CriLJ1249; (1980)4SCC125; [1980]3SCR1127

..... a woman in distress has been denied heartlessly and lawlessly we say heartlessly because no sensitive judge with empathy for the weaker sex could have callously cancelled an order for a ..... work that civilised society itself depends 5 we lay so much emphasis on the functional sensitization of a judge lest what is absurd may be fobbed as obvious by judicial semanticisation .....

Roadway Express, Inc. Vs. Piper

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of controlling abuses of judicial processes the fee provisions of the civil rights laws are sensitive to the merits of the action and to antidiscrimination policy restrict recovery to prevailing parties ..... controlling abuses of judicial processes the fee provisions of the civil rights laws are acutely sensitive to the merits of an action and to antidiscrimination policy unlike 1927 both 1988 and .....