Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act 2000 section 8 application for registration Page 1 of about 92 results (0.187 seconds)

May 28 2015 (HC)

Sunil Alag Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... microelectronics initiative (2001): with a view to protect ipr in vlsi design, drafted subordinate legislation under semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act 2000. ..... also conceived and was instrumental in the drafting of the semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act, 2000. ..... sunil alag has contributed in drafting a subordinate legislation under semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act , which has come into force. ..... a pertinent decision on the subject is rajesh awasthi v nandlal jaiswal 2013 (1) scc501 the court had examined the appointment to the electricity regulatory commission under the electricity act, 2003; the relevant provision (section 84 (1)) stated that the chairperson and members shall be persons of ability and integrity and standing who have adequate knowledge of, and have shown capacity in, dealing with problems relating to engineering, finance, commerce or management. ..... (adherence to prescribed guidelines and criteria, in regard to selection to ensure fairness, objectivity and equality); application of administrative law principles (taking into account relevant factors, eschewing irrelevant factors, applying the mind, objectively to the facts and disclosing a discernable and relevant rationale for the decision), adherence to prescribed statutory provisions (wherever existing), bona fide use of power and absence of any bias are as applicable in regard to appointments made by the union cabinet, as any other.29. ..... poulose, section officer, dopt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2019 (HC)

Saurabh Bindal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... this public interest litigation (pil) has been preferred with the following prayers: (i) pass a writ and/or any other order declaring section 18(4) of the semiconductor integrated circuit layout design act, 2000 as violative of article 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the constitution of india and hence unconstitutional and therefore void; (ii) pass such further writ and/or orders as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the ..... who is appearing in person, is an advocate, submitted that section 18(4) of the semiconductor integrated circuit layout design act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) is violative of article 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the ..... by the petitioner in person that as on the date of filing of this writ petition, there were two registered proprietors of the semiconductors, namely, indian space research organization (isro) and bharat heavy electrical limited (bhel) and now, there can be others also. ..... the apprehension that there will be violation of the rights of aforesaid registered proprietors of semiconductors, this public interest litigation has been preferred by the petitioner in person.3. ..... reason to entertain this public interest litigation at the behest of the petitioner in person, mainly for the reason that main contention of this petitioner is to safeguard and protect the interests of the registered proprietors of semiconductors, which are isro, bhel and such other registered proprietors. ..... can always approach this court for violation of their rights. ..... for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2013 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... semiconductor integrated circuits layout-design ..... since the period of limitation for filing an appeal against the acquittal under section 378 is ninety days and no period of limitation has been provided for filing an appeal under section 372 by a victim , the same period of limitation as provided under article 114 of the limitation act will be applicable for filing an appeal under section 372 of the code ..... sub-section (5) of section 378 has no application to an appeal by the state government or to an application for leave under sub-section (3).what the legislature clearly crm-790-ma-2010 final - 71 - intended was to continue to provide that an appeal by the state government would not be maintainable if special leave to appeal ..... . question (f) (viii) the proviso to section 372 inserted w.e.f.december 31, 2009 is prospective in application and only those orders which have been passed on or after december 31, 2009, irrespective of the date of occurrence or registration of fir or filing of complaint, shall be appealable at the instance of ..... . a victim is entitled to prefer appeal in respect of any type of order referred to in the proviso to section 372 if such order has been passed on or after december 31, 2009 irrespective of the date of registration of fir or the date of occurrence etc.to be more specific, it is clarified that it is the date of passing of the order to be appealed from and not any other fact situation, which shall determine the ..... (registration and protection) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2007 (HC)

Cattle Remedies and anr. Vs. Licensing Authority/Director of Ayurvedic ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1093

..... semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act, 2000 ..... petitioner also filed an application for obtaining trade marks for the disputed drugs by ..... mark dispute is decided in favour of the contesting respondent or the petitioner is restrained from using these names as trade marks then we grant liberty to the contesting respondent to file application before the licensing authority to ask the petitioner to change the name of the drugs in the licence and to grant licence to the contesting respondent in the same name. ..... were established by issuance of letters patent.the law passed by venetian senate stated:we have among us men of great genius, apt to invent and discover ingenious devices....now, if provisions were made for the works and devices discovered by such persons, so that others who may see them could not build them and take the inventors' honour away, more men would then apply their genius ..... less than fifteen days from the date of receipt of such notice, why such an order should not be passed, by an order in writing stating the reasons therefor, cancel a licence issued under this part or suspend it for such period as he thinks fit, either wholly or in respect of some of the drugs to which it relates, if in his opinion, the licensee has failed to comply with any of the conditions of the licence or with any ..... drugs act defines the words 'ayurvedic, siddha and unani drugs' in sub-section (a) of section 3, section 3(a) of the drugs act ..... goods (registration and protection) act, 1999. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

Ascot Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bon Vivant Life Style Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... services and financial services; (xiv) mercantile agency and mercantile usage; (xv) partnership agreements; (xvi) technology development agreements; (xvii) intellectual property rights relating to registered and unregistered trademarks, copyright, patent, design, domain names, geographical indications and semiconductor integrated circuits; (xviii) agreements for sale of goods or provision of services; (xix) exploitation of oil and gas reserves or other natural resources including electromagnetic spectrum; (xx) insurance and re-insurance; (xxi) contracts of agency relating to any of the above ..... division which would hear the instant petition as also other applications and petitions filed under the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 after october 23, 2015, with consent of learned counsel for the parties, including the learned additional solicitor general of india, we have heard arguments on the issue : whether section 10 of the ordinance takes away the right of appeal conferred by section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, and which issue would subsume : whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2017 (SC)

Competition Commission of India Vs. Co-Ordination Committee of Artists ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in this section shall restrict (i) the right of any person to restrain any infringement of, or to impose reasonable conditions, as may be necessary for protecting any of his rights which have been or may be conferred upon him under (a) the copyright act, 1957 (14 of 1957); (b) the patents act, 1970 (39 of 1970); (c) the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 (43 of 1958) or the trade marks act, 1999 (47 of 1999); (d) the geographical indications of goods (registration and protection) act, 1999 (48 of 1999); (e) the designs act, 2000 (16 of 2000); \ (f) the semi-conductor integrated circuits layout-design act, 2000 (37 of 2000); (ii) the ..... right of any person to export goods from india to the extent to which the agreement relates exclusively to the production, supply, distribution or control of goods or provision of services for such export. ..... proviso thereto, however, exempts certain kinds of agreements, meaning thereby if a particular case falls under the proviso, then such a presumption would not be applicable. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2006 (SC)

Anjaleem Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2006)108BOMLR296; 2006(194)ELT129(SC); JT2006(1)SC353; 2006(1)SCALE314; (2006)2SCC336

..... the explanatory note to hsn (2nd edition, 1996), at page 1234, separate electrical parts have been classified under one or other of the headings of chapter 85, for example, transistors, diodes and similar semiconductor devices, stand classified under heading 85.41 while electronic integrated circuits are classified under heading 85.42. ..... following two questions arise for determination in this civil appeal filed by the assessee under section 35-l(b) of the central excise act, 1944 (for short 'the act'): (1) whether a programmed or designed eprom is an integral part of std- pco unit; and (2) whether the appellant herein was entitled to exemption under notification no.84/89 ce dated 1.3.1989 which required the appellant to show that the programmed eprom was a "recorded medium" under chapter heading 85.24 read with note 6 to chapter 85 of the 1985 tariff act. ..... , learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the department, on the other hand, submitted that note 6 to chapter 85 was not applicable for the computer-based product, namely std-pco unit, as the programmed eprom constituted an inbuilt component of the final std- pco unit. ..... in the year 2000 the excise act was amended and the concept of "transaction value" came to be introduced for the first time ..... , the argument on behalf of the department was that the loading of operational software was includible in the value of the computer manufacture by the assessee after 1.4.2000 when the concept of transaction value came to be introduced. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2005 (HC)

N. Ranga Rao and Sons Vs. Anil Garg and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT649; 2006(32)PTC15(Del)

..... the significance of the addition of word 'lotus' is sought to be diluted in terms of the submissions made by learned counsel for the plaintiff on account of two factors - firstly, the defendants admittedly attempted to file an application for registration of the mark dia in class 3 and the application was not for lotus dia and secondly, the primary ingredients of the defendants' mark is dia and the word 'lotus' is an extremely insignificant ..... cartons are stated to have been designed by professionals for the plaintiff firm and the rights are stated to vest in the plaintiff under section 17 of the copyright act, 1957.11. ..... in other words, if the first glance of the article without going into the minute details of the colour combination, get-up or layout appearing on the container and packaging gives the impression as to deceptive or near similarities in respect of these ingredients, it is a case of confusion and amounts to passing off one's own goods as those ..... it is necessary to go into the question of comparable strength, the decision on merits in dyechem's case, air 2000 scw 2172: air 2000 sc 2114: 2000 clc 1338 (supra) does not, in our opinion, lay down correct law and we hold accordingly.'60 ..... the substantial reputation and goodwill of the plaintiff and it is all the more because of the nature of the products where packaging forms an essential and integral part of identification of the products. ..... the judgment of court of appeals, second circuit in perfect fit industries, inc. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2008 (HC)

F. Hoffmann-la Roche Ltd. and anr. Vs. Cipla Limited

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT598; LC2008(2)35; 2008(37)PTC71(Del)

..... specification;g) that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation;h) that the subject of any claim of the complete specification is not patentable under this act;i) that the applicant for the patent has failed to disclose to the controller the information required by section 8 or has furnished information which in any material particular was false to his knowledge;j) the drug was known or is at best a pre-1995 derivative of ..... seeds, varieties and species and essentially biological processes for production or propagation of plants and animals;(k) a mathematical or business method or a computer program per se or algorithms;(l) a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work or any other aesthetic creation whatsoever including cinematographic works and television productions;(m) a mere scheme or rule or method of performing mental act or method of playing game;(n) a presentation of information;(o) topography of integrated circuits;(p) an invention which in effect, is traditional knowledge ..... health services, central government registered tarceva, by registration certificate dated 23.12.2005 in the name of the ..... trademarks and designs, new delhi ..... ep 0566 226 a 1 in its patent application during prosecution or during opposition proceedings and not even during the present proceedings in this court.c) no data in the form of research done by the plaintiff has been placed on record.d) all the articles and publications are post 2000 and thus there is no clarity as to whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2008 (HC)

Magotteaux Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Aia Engineering Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT73; 2009(39)PTC212(Del)

..... composite wear component which was issued on 4th june 2002 (initially the application for registration of patent was filed on 27th august 1997 as ptc application).35. ..... what then is the true test to be applied for determining whether an order is a judgment within the meaning of the lahore high court letters patent as applicable to the high court of delhi and section 10 of the delhi high court act can be answered authoritatively only by reference to the decision of the apex court in shah babulal khimji's case (supra) the court had in that case recognized three distinct kinds of judgments, namely:(i) ..... al.2o.3 and 80 to 20% of zro.2, the percentages being expressed by weights of the constituents, and the porous ceramic pad being integrated into the metal matrix by impregnation of a liquid metal in the porous ceramic pad during the casting. 2. ..... (d) the importation into the united states, the sale for importation, or the sale within the united states after importation by the owner, importer, or consignee, of a semiconductor chip product in a manner that constitutes infringement of a mask work registered under ..... not transferred to the respondent under the settlement deed dated 16th february 2000 since the said technology was confidential and still under development.30. ..... (d) of paragraph (1) apply only if an industry in the united states, relating to the articles protected by the patent, copyright, trademark, mask work or design concerned, exists or is in the process of being established. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //