Self Employed - Judgment Search Results

Workers Employed in Hirakud Dam Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC2242; [1971(22)FLR188]; 1971LabIC1381; (1971)ILLJ224SC; (1971)1SCC583; [1971]3SCR646

the terms of engagement should be clearly explained to men employed in the circumstances mentioned above 15 that the above are

NLRB Vs. Plasters' Local

Court: US Supreme Court

work at issue neither had contracts with the plasterers nor employed plasterers regularly both employers determined it to be in their

Chemical Workers Vs. Pittsburgh Glass

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appropriate for such purposes this obligation extends only to the terms and conditions of employment of the employer s employees in the unit appropriate for such purposes that the union represents ..... collective bargaining and by protecting the exercise by workers of full freedom of association self organization and designation of representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of negotiating .....

California Dept. of Human Resources Vs. Java

Court: US Supreme Court

a first line of defense for a worker ordinarily steadily employed for a limited period during which there is expectation that

Motor Coach Employees Vs. Lockridge

Court: US Supreme Court

..... simultaneously notified greyhound of this determination and requested that lockridge be removed from employment greyhound promptly complied lockridge s wife received notice of the suspension from membership ..... state a workable rule that comports reasonably with apparent congressional objectives are necessarily self evident in fact varying approaches were taken by the court in initially grappling .....

Griggs Vs. Duke Power Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

graduates footnote 4 the court of appeals ruled that negroes employed in the labor department at a time when there was

Phillips Vs. MartIn Marietta Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

of the time of the motion for summary judgment martin employed men with pre school age children 3 at the time

Ramsey Vs. Mine Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... may make wage agreements with a multi employer bargaining unit and in pursuit of its own self interests seek to secure the same terms ..... or less standardized wages hours and other terms and conditions of employment in a given industry or market area are often secured either ..... from other employers and 2 that the antitrust exemption .....

Nlrb Vs. Operating Engineers

Court: US Supreme Court

burns subcontracted construction work to three companies all of which employed operating engineers who belonged to respondent union that union disputing

Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. Vs. S. Taki Bilgrami and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC306; 1972LabIC171; (1971)IILLJ317SC; (1971)2SCC633; [1972]1SCR145

and not one of reduction of the number of persons employed hence it is not a case of reduction of posts