Self Devoted - Judgment Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya and anr.

Court: Guwahati

t vaiphei j 1 the legality of the order dated 5 6 2006 passed by the learned additional deputy commissioner...

Jada Vasantha Rao and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), General

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

..... dated 17 12 2003 and as such failed to maintain absolute devotion to duty and caused pecuniary loss to the administration violating the ..... for the error sheet debit of rs 4432 on account of self printing ticket machine sptm debits at vijayawada railway station raised by ..... the error sheet debit of rs 24 537 on account of self printing ticket machine sptm debits at vijayawada railway station raised by .....

Galileo International Inc. Vs. Dcit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

business however when the activities of such an agent are devoted wholly or almost wholly on behalf of that enterprise and

Amadeus Global Travel Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)113TTJ(Delhi)767

activities of amadeus india pvt ltd are wholly and exclusively devoted to providing services to the assessee therefore a company which

Kulbir Krishan, Ips Inspector Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)(1)SLJ294CAT

order he was awarded the police special duty medal for devotion to duty police medal for meritorious service several professional awards

Procter and Gamble India Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of I.T., Special

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)301ITR404(Mum.)

and those areas of the processor s plant which are devoted to the process of the product or any materials used

Dr. B.N. Mittal S/O Late Shri B.R. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

designated as addl dg since retired failed to maintain absolute devotion to duty and acted in a manner unbecoming of a

B. Rama Subbamma Vs. the Postmaster General, Kurnool

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

the provisions of above rules and thereby failed to maintain devotion to duty as required by rule 17 of eda s

Shri G. Ramachandra Rao S/O Shri G. Vs. the General Manager, South

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

ramachandra rao bsr bza failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and violated rule 3 1 i ii of

Ashok Kumar Arora S/O Late Shri Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... been treated as an act which failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty applicant in the meanwhile was transferred to delhi and ..... a manner unbecoming of govt servant failure to maintain absolute integrity devotion to duty they are after effects of his staying away from ..... of mumbai are not suitable for him for the matter of self defence the only thing he could do was to stay away .....