Self Contained - Judgment Search Results

Mahesh Chandra Purohit Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd. and ors ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2002(1)WLC140; 2001(4)WLN671

that he has no objection to setting up of inland container depot at jodhpur as it will benefit to the general

M/S Suraj Containers Ltd. and Vs. C.C.E., Calcutta-i

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

passed y the authorities below in the impugned orders tin containers valued at rs 46 200 and the vehicle carrying the

M/S Express TIn Containers (P) Vs. C.C.E., Calcutta-ii

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

kgs thus showing the average weight of tin plates per container 0 496 kg as such he submits that if the

M/S. Suraj Containers Ltd. and Md. Vs. Cce, Calcutta-i

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT350Tri(Kol.)kata

ld jdr appearing for the revenue while reiterating the reasoning contained in the impugned order refers to the decision of the

The Commissioner of Central Vs. M/S. Vijaya Seamless Containers

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT107Tri(Bang.)

and used for packing of the end product namely aluminium containers it is a case of the department that item as

Marine Container Services (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Dhirajlal Vora

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR699; (2002)104BOMLR273

the arbitrator under the 1996 act in other words nothing contained in article 3 of schedule i of the bombay court

ito Vs. H.A. Containers

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)87TTJ(Mumbai)729

the arbitrator under the 1996 act in other words nothing contained in article 3 of schedule i of the bombay court

Gujarat Container Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

further notification 16 94 which prescribes documents for taking credit contains in serial no 10 to its table endorsed gate passes

Universal Cans and Containers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT182Tri(Mum.)bai

its factory on 30 6 1986 a consignment of tin containers intended to store toothpowder there was a delay in the

Vardhaman Containers and Papers Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court: DRAT Delhi

1 heard the appellant was not a party before the tribunal below and the case of the appellant is that...