Self Command - Judgment Search Results

Pew Vs. Commandant

Court: US Supreme Court

u s 421 1966 382 u s 421 pew v commandant u s coast guard appeal from the united states court

Ranjit Singh Vs. Commandant and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1968P& H7

evidence found against the petitioner on september 3 1960 the commandant of the punjab armed police at jullundur cantt on those

Govinda Reddi Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1969)ILLJ493Kant; (1966)2MysLJ97

the two witnesses who gave evidence about it although the commanding officer made no record of their evidence it was in

Ruttonjee and Company Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1967Cal450

..... vested in another authority in these circumstances mandamus should issue in the interests of the proper conduct of the public administration ..... section 1 or sub section 3 may be exercised suo motu what makes the difference if the state government proceeds under either ..... the state government elects to exercise its power of revision suo motu under sub section 3 it cannot but proceed quasi judicially and .....

Kartick Chandra Nandi Vs. West Bengal Small Industries Corporation Ltd ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1967Cal231

..... having the force of law which may be enforced by mandamus i should also point out that the impugned letter at ann b does not refuse ..... a writ or make an order in the nature of mandamus against the appellant may be said to exist in a court 20 the case of ..... bodies which do not discharge functions similar to that of a local self government organ e g a state electricity supply board mohan lal v state .....

Awadh Behari Singh Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1967Cal323,1967CriLJ741

12 dated 26th of april 1962 is addressed by the commanding officer to the deputy commissioner of excise and its contents

Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC1; [1966]3SCR744

to interfere by way of high prerogative writs of certiorari mandamus and prohibition such powers have not been invoked against the

Arun Ranjan Mukherjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1967)IILLJ289Cal

..... state government as well as by the central government itself that the post of a commandant of armed police was equivalent to a senior indian police service post the petitioner cannot ..... in the indian police service special recruitment regulations 1957 these regulations do not provide a self contained code relating to the mode of special recruitment but introduce certain modifications subject to .....

Ftc Vs. Borden Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

though the one label may have more customer appeal and command a higher price in the marketplace from a substantial segment

Ftc Vs. Dean Foods Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court omits the italicized portion a writ of mandamus may issue in aid of the appellate jurisdiction which might otherwise be ..... that congress refused to authorize preliminary restraints at the command of the commission its refusal to authorize such relief in the district ..... the court of appeals has plenary jurisdiction implemented by the self contained all writs provision and when the record is filed .....