Section 95 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 95 Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 367 results (0.162 seconds)Garcia Vs. San Antonio Transit Auth.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-19-1985
..... variety of sovereign powers for example are withdrawn from the states by article i 10 section 8 of the same article works an equally sharp contraction of state sovereignty by authorizing ..... course better approximates the citizen participation ideal acir citizen participation in the american federal system 95 1980 moreover we have witnessed in recent years the rise of numerous special interest groups .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBank of India and Etc. Vs. Sital Chandra Das and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-06-1985
Reported in: AIR1986Cal313
..... loss unjustly caused where damage is the gist of the action neither section 95 nor the ingredients of an action for malicious prosecution stand in the ..... to that effect before the competent court and in such proceeding under section 95 1 of the c p c the court cannot but confine its ..... be made bound to bring an action only under the provisions of section 95 1 of thec p c for damages but he may institute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commonwealth Assurance Co. Ltd., the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-23-1985
Reported in: 2(1985)ACC374
..... appellant was not enhanced beyond that is provided in sub section 2 a of section 95 of the act the contention of the appellant is ..... contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that sub section 2 a of section 95 lays down the maximum liability of the insurer there ..... were allowed to be carried hence the maximum liability imposed under section 95 2 on the insurer is rs 2 000 per passenger though .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Deepathumma and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-31-1985
Reported in: I(1987)ACC102; 1985MhLJ858
..... restitutive justice to those who are affected by accidents 12 sub section 2 of section 95 of the act still even after amendment has reference to ..... is clear along with the purpose of the provisions sub section 2 of section 95 of the act can only mean harmoniously as far as ..... workable limit clause 2 of sub clause b of sub section 2 of section 95 of the act is enumerative in character laying down the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghib Nasim and anr. Vs. Naseem Ahmad and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-17-1985
Reported in: [1986]60CompCas561(All)
..... the supreme court was a case of clause a of sub section 2 of section 95 which is meant to cover a case of carriage of goods ..... of liability of the company evidently refer to the limit prescribed under section 95 2 b of the motor vehicles act no clause in the ..... providing for the payment of any amount higher than that fixed under section 95 2 b was brought to our notice the clause dealing with avoidance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurinder Kumar JaIn Vs. Smt. Sukh Dai and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-24-1985
Reported in: [1986]60CompCas650(P& H)
..... workmen s compensation act 1923 occurring in clause a of sub section 2 of section 95 of the act implied that the insurer was liable for ..... s compensation act 1923 7 a reading of the provisions in section 95 of the act would show that there is no provision contained ..... the limit of liability of the insurance company is prescribed under section 95 2 a of the act which was rightly construed by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagabat Kundu Vs. Debidutta Agarwalla and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-22-1985
..... is the limit of the liability of an insurer under section 95 read with section 110b of the act the question has been posed by ..... compensation against the owner the policy coupled with the provisions of section 95 make the insurer liable to pay the awarded amount which is ..... been directed to be paid by the insured or the driver section 95 5 of the act makes it clear that notwithstanding anything contained .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Asha Rani Vs. Sia Ram and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-12-1985
Reported in: [1987]61CompCas794(All)
..... which can be fastened against the insurer because it is submitted section 95 1 does not requirecoverage of such a risk nor does the ..... can always take policies covering risks which are not covered by section 95 and in that event the insurer would be liable to indemnify ..... its own language as to derogate against the mandatory requirement of section 95 1 there is consequently no escape in any case from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghib Nasim and anr. Vs. Naseem Ahmed and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-17-1985
Reported in: 2(1985)ACC233
..... the supreme court was a case of clause a of sub section 2 of section 95 which is meant to cover a case of carriage of ..... others received minor injuries in that connection the supreme court considered section 95 2 and found the opening words of this clause subject to ..... providing for the payment of any amount higher than that fixed under section 95 2 b we brought to our notice the clause dealing with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSagar Chand Phool Chand JaIn Vs. Santosh Guptas and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-1985
Reported in: [1987]62CompCas55(Delhi)
..... in section 2 referring to the liability under section 95 is a mere repetition of the contents of section 95 but where after reproducing section 95 the ..... the ratio of the supreme court judgment is that under section 95 of the motor vehicles act 1939 the liability of insurance ..... company is restricted to the statutory liability under section 95 and no more if the risk to the passenger is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial