Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Court: privy council Year: 1934 Page 1 of about 46 results (0.083 seconds)Trustees of the Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim Baronetcy Trust Vs. Commissione ...
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Feb-26-1934
..... with which this case is concerned these two sections so far as material are as follows section 8 the tax shall be payable by an ..... property iv business v professional earings vi other sources section 7 deals with salaries ss 8 and 9 deal with interest on securities and ..... laid down for that year by act of the indian legislature section 56 subject to the provisions of this chapter the total income .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBishun Chand Vs. Girdhari Lal and Another
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : May-14-1934
stated 10 1880 2 all 641 11 1880 2 all 872 12 1880 3 all 148 fb 13 1883 awn 47
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamachandra Deo Mahaharajulungaru Vs. Sri Lakshiminarasimha Bahadur an ...
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Mar-20-1934
..... lordships will humbly advise his majesty accordingly order accordingly madras land revenue assessment act 1876 section 1 cases referred 1 air 1919 pc 150 51 ic 185 46 ia 151 42 ..... of the permanently settled land revenue of the lands included in the zamindary under s 8 of the regulation he has full powers of transfer but is not relieved from his .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Radha Krishna Thakurji and Another Vs. (Babu) Raghunandan Sinha an ...
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Dec-20-1934
..... plot no 2139 as above mentioned appeal dismissed bengal tenancy act 8 of 1885 section 120 cases referred 1 dakeshwar prasad narain singh v gulab kuer ..... settled raiyat of a village within the meaning of the last foregoing section shall have a right of occupancy in all land for the ..... occupancy in the lands in suit under the bengal tenancy act act 8 of 1885 and the question in issue in the present appeal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Elvira Rodrigues) Siqueira Vs. (Godnicalo Hypolito Constancio) Noronh ...
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Feb-15-1934
of by the terms of s 25 contract act that section deals only with the question of promises made without consideration shillings then 1923 to total debits for the year 5 813 shillings and by salary for the year and refund of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEjas Ali Qidwai and Others Vs. Special Manager, Court of Wards, Balram ...
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Dec-18-1934
..... according to the mahomedan law as laid down by the twenty third section of the oudh estates act succession to such property is regulated by ..... with the result that the property sought to be recovered amounted to 8 9ths of the mortgaged estate the remaining 1 9th being the ..... reason for dissenting from that conclusion the second list framed under s 8 of the act contains a recital of the family custom by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohammad Akbar Khan Vs. Mian Musharaf Shah and Another
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Jul-20-1934
..... council privy council record punjab tenancy act 16 of 1887 section 77 and section 88 tenancy attachment decree revenue court mortgage comparative citation 1934 ..... court before the assistant collector a decree for rupees 1 484 8 0 together with costs and future interest in april 1932 after ..... debtor a decree hereinafter called the second money decree for rs 8 321 0 9 and costs on 18th may 1921 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSeth Pratapsingh Moholalbhai and Another Vs. Keshavlal Harilal Setahva ...
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Nov-27-1934
..... to consider the effect of s 133 contract act whether that much discussed section relates only to continuing guarantees or is intended to affect a guarantee of ..... document there has been mentioned a piece of land admeasuring 1 acre and 8 gunthas out of 4 acres and 22 gunthas bearing old survey no 578 ..... referred 1 blest v brown 1862 4 de g f and j 367 8 jur ns 602 10 wr 569 6 lt 620 2 smith v wood .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Gorakhpur Vs. Bam Sundar Mal and Others
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Jun-11-1934
..... appeal succeeds evidence act 1 of 1872 section 13 section 35 and section 32 5 registration act 16 of 1908 section 28 from allahabad air 1930 all ..... for instance the case in malikarjuna prasada nayadu v venkata ramalingamma 8 which regarded their right to maintenance however limited out of an ..... of nearly rs 10 000 and the government revenue is rs 8 213 in the claim the entire summer room is valued at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLachmi NaraIn and Another Vs. Syed Ibrahim Hussain
Court : Privy Council
Decided on : Jul-10-1934
decision expressed the view that the word property in the sections of the act above set forth plainly meant the entire
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT