Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Court: mumbai Year: 1934 Page 1 of about 190 results (0.529 seconds)Kamalakant Gopalji Vs. Madhavji Vaghji
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-26-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom343; 158Ind.Cas.145
..... was therefore the holder of the notes a holder is defined in section 8 negotiable instruments act as the person entitled in his own name ..... mad 88 that the words in his own name appearing in section 8 of the act were inserted by the legislature to prevent anyone ..... scheduled caste or scheduled tribe it is not a requirement und4r section 3 of the atrocities act that the complainant should disclose the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Jalal Dhondibhai
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-13-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom211; (1934)36BOMLR435
..... to exercise the powers conferred by section 8 sub section 1 of the reformatory schools act 1897 that section is in terms clearly permissive when ..... government to exercise the powers conferred by section 8 sub section 1 of the reformatory schools act 1897 that ..... no jurisdiction to try him having regard to the provisions of section 29b of the criminal procedure code the learned district magistrate is of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTrustees of the Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim Baronetcy Trust Vs. the Commiss ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-26-1934
Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR557
..... or lands appurtenant thereto of which he is the owner 8 provisos to section 8 relieve the assessee from income tax on certain securities ..... sums calculated on percentages of capital sums there specified by section 8 the residue of the income was to be paid to ..... iv business v professional earnings vi other sources 7 section 7 deals with salaries sections 8 and 9 deal with interest on securities and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayan Atmaram Patkar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-07-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom378; [1934]2ITR486(Bom)
of the act or for quashing such complaint then sub section 3 provides that if the commissioner refuses to state a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs. D. N. MehtA.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-22-1934
Reported in : [1935]3ITR147(Bom)
prior to the date of the enactment of the said section viz 11th september 1933 in other words has the new
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJinnappa Mahadevappa Kudachi and ors. Vs. Chimmava Krishnappa Kochari
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-03-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom324; 159Ind.Cas.207
..... to scheduled caste or scheduled tribe it is not a requirement und4r section 3 of the atrocities act that the complainant should disclose the caste ..... that cannot be a ground for either not registering the offence under section 3 of the act or for quashing such complaint the question is ..... and it is too late for the respondent to raise it now 8 undoubtedly the gift is of a small portion of the whole of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovernment Pleader Vs. R. A. Pleader
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-18-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom71
..... to have been passed pending the disposal of the case under section 498 on 7th august the district magistrate modified his earlier ..... wife the matter appears to have begun with an application under section 100 by shiva mathur on that application the district magistrate ..... respect the opponent had the deliberate intention of misleading the court 8 as regards the suppression of the alleged fact that it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Borough Vs. Mahomed Isak Abdul Karim
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-06-1934
Reported in : AIR1936Bom43; 160Ind.Cas.736
..... some of them who though disqualified under section 11 sub section 2 were qualified under section 11 sub section 1 it seems to me clear from ..... oversight omitted from the electoral roll and whose qualifications under section 11 sub section 1 had not been considered at all the act of ..... he did the act in his official capacity would not suffice 8 it is contended on behalf of the respondent that the act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabu Mahadeo Prasad Singh Vs. Karia Bharati
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-18-1934
Reported in : (1935)37BOMLR333
them justified in determining the real dispute on the merits 8 the only other question raised on behalf of the appellants
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Mahomed Haji Haroon Kadwani
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-19-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom254; (1935)37BOMLR396
no 507 of 1921 decided by pratt j on april 8 1921 unrep declared to be a good bequest 2 in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT